pittsburghjoe

Think inside the box ..those quantum waves ..are em waves.

Why hasn't it occurred to anyone that the EM spectrum is it's own dimension? Did we not think it was special enough to warrant such praise? I think the current double slit experiment is all I need to prove that it is a new-to-us dimension.

Maybe it would be better titled "EM Dimension", all I know is that it is the realm that superposition takes place. PLEASE humor me and pretend such a thing could exist. Are there any other flaws to it other than you not being taught it in school? Would a working EMDrive be proof of this layer?

In order to interact with this dimension you need a molecule or smaller free sized object with a wavelength long enough that can go into superposition. EM waves are included

It's a new-to-us dimension. Pre-existing concepts can carry on with what they know if they want to. An EMDrive might be exploiting this superdimention and be the proof that I need.

Is there something preventing this superdimention from being a real thing?

The answer to quantum weirdness was in front of us the whole time. A dimension of superposition solves everything. All superposition events interact with a special dimension that we haven't uncovered until now. We currently can't know the position & velocity of a particle because the one or the other is interacting with this special dimension. Entanglement of particle systems are linked via this dimension. Observing a particle in the double slit unhinges it's path from the unobserved dimension. For the love of no god, someone attempt a criss-cross multiple double slit experiment, we might discover proof of this new dimension.

I think the video hints that there isn't a 4th dimension ..but maybe an 8th and 24th. These higher dimensional spheres are interesting to me as I have my own tin foil hat assumption that they are present when a single particle isn't measured. The unobserved particle seems like a wave to us because it has to navigate around all these spheres.

Wouldn't you want to know if there is a 3D lattice all around us? It would be undeniable proof we are in a simulation.

My theory doesn't change the current results except for when trying to trick the system. Can the current established equation handle a criss-cross setup? What are the results when doing so? I'll say whatever you want to conduct this experiment

I used quantum randomness to decide what characters/symbols to write. Bazinga! Why would I need a different equation than one that is already established? Can I just have the closest one to the experiment I'm speaking of and mod in the bit about a lattice?

Here, please try the experiment now.

The new rule is that EM waves are not waves because they want to be. They take the shape that a 3D lattice allows when not being measured.

Superposition isn't science? Please share in my glory and set this criss-cross experiment up.

You guys want me to apply math to something that doesn't follow the rules. Shoot me for having an educated* guess that might show us all something new. *I can see you smirking

The results will be neither clumps or fringes (on average) ..the particle might not even hit the final panel. I would want one test to fire and another to fire while the first particle is still in motion. Make the experiment large enough that both particles can be in the air and not be considered effecting each others "waves". Regardless of my theory, this experiment should be conducted.

I'm never going to get my Nobel peace prize with that kind of talk.

Depends on what the results end up being. Has a criss-cross been done before?

Didn't a resent study of more super nova detail that the universe is not actually accelerating ..but is still expanding at a consistent rate?

Criss-cross multiple double slit experiment paths. One of the multiple tests using a detector at the slits in an attempt to mix a lattice environment with an observed one.

Why are we so certain EM packets travel physically as waves when not being measured? What if there is an invisible 3d lattice throughout the universe that an EM packet has to traverse when not being observed? When a measurement is made, the lattice disappears or morphs out of the way. If this turned out to be true, it would suggest a bubble of space-time, engulfing the experiment, is what would be changing dependent on a detector being used. I would be curious of multiple double slit experiments being conducted next to each other to see if overlapping bubbles cause anything weird in the results.

yes, the ignorance is strong in this one. Don't act like you don't know what I'm talking about.

Embracing ignorance is what you guys are doing. A real physicist wouldn't settle for what he is allowed to know.

::pulls some of his own hair out::

no need?! Magic is happening in front of us and you don't want to investigate because the math with get hard or you might have to accept that something supernatural is happening.