pittsburghjoe

Sorry, the issue is that I need one of you smart guys to investigate my claims for me as I'm a hipster doofus.

note: I am the resident clown, so please wait for a professional to answer your questions. You would think so, but whatever glitch is happening seems to require direct atomic scale knowledge. The quantum eraser experiment (as well as this one: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/double-slit-detectors-question.890825/#post-5604049 ) proves its not the detectors effecting the outcome. I assume that they don't collapse ..they just continue being in a energy wave state until they hit something Entangled particles are thought to be of the same particle ..well, a complex two-particle system with an indeterminate state QM is the study of what we are allowed to know

How is weirdness not evidence of a simulation? What more do you need? We are not allowed to know both the position and velocity of a particle. The best we can do is probability wave? That's pathetic. A particle can be anywhere ..including two places at the same time?? That sure seems like it's being scrambled on purpose. If you were to build a simulation, would you want your drones discovering how to receive root access? No, you would attempt to block them from understanding the framework to their world. The cosmic ray cutoff also seems suspicious of a limit to our simulation.

How dare I ask something that questions QM. Why is QM so dismissive to the notion that we are in a simulation? Is QM unable to accept new angles of unifying classical to local? There is no logical reason for weirdness at the atomic scale.

Couldn't the Uncertainty Principle behavior be seen as a means to scramble the atomic scale from intelligent beings?

I'm suggesting that it physically changes from particle to an energy wave dependent on observation. Unless the wave function can somehow focus the movement of the particle when observed.

Doesn't the double slit experiment suggest that it literally swaps between being a wave or particle ..not so much as being both at the same time? You would never see the interference pattern it if was both at the same time.

Is the problem that we are not asking the correct type of properties it has at the time? Are you saying that you believe it is nothingness when not being observed? Tell me what you use for your own personal placeholder ..a dumbed-down version for a simpleton such as myself.

What if the photon actually becomes a wave when we aren't measuring it? I'd like to one day see a spectrogram of the wave if we can ever trick it into divulging that info.

So we know light is supposedly simultaneously photons and waves. Have any experiments been attempted to line up the chunks of photons to the peaks in it's wave function?

Atom Interferometer! very interesting ..do we know more about different particles waves yet (besides polarizability)? And check this out (Making Monopoles with Waves) https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.181601 and this is why I'm so interested in particle waves (potential connection? Surface Waves Store Bouncing Droplet’s History) https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/101 one more (Ripples in a BEC Pond) https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.243003

well, yeah ..except we are not allowed to observe the wave behavior at the atomic level. I want to know if we could ever remove/strip the wave behavior from a particle ..besides observing it.

Particle-Wave Duality The double slit experiment proves that it is not only a mathematical description

wrong, read this comment https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/double-slit-detectors-question.890825/#post-5604049

Theoretically, if we could know more about a particles wave ..could we create a particle by only replicating it's wave?

QM, the study of what we are allowed to know at the atomic scale