Christ slave

Can you make this sentence a bit clearer? If you follow the laws of physics in many different angles, scales, etc., you will see them all echoing (whether large or small). So, whereby you see an atom with a nucleus and electrons spinning around it, as material manifests in larger proportions, you begin to see atoms being rebuilt on a larger scale (solar systems, galaxies, etc.). As such, such comparisons and analogies are not necessarily to induce deeper thinking alone, but such analogies may and often are precisely and objective. If you were to equate life to the biological span of a pregnancy, then death becomes another biological and conscious (HUGE) event/transformation to an entity's experience. Death is a birth--as real and biological (although perhaps vastly different/mind altering in the experience and awareness, knowledge, and perspective of the individual who dies) as birth itself. This is simply a phase in our growth, as real and existent as our time in the womb before we entered into this present world/life (the light of the outside world under the sun). Likewise, as we were one with our mothers' body, so we are one with this earthly body (mother earth). The flesh is like the womb and plecenta of the earth to the spiritual body--connected by a silver cord (an umbilica cord). Now, since our fleshly bodies have been borne and are living in this level of growth/being (this life on earth, born from the woman), we can see and perceive as much as the flesh is allowed, as its eyes are open and it is born. However, since we perceive the fleshly and limit of the flesh body, and since this awakening came by being born where the light exist(ed) out of our mothers' bodies, so our spiritual bodies are growing among us, like fetuses in the womb, with closed eyes and in darkness of the mother's body. Until we die, you must be willing to recognize that your eyes are closed (your spiritual eyes) and you are not yet borne, living, and perceiving as a living spiritual body, since it is still in the womb. Likewise, this is an echo--an echo in form. You take things on a smaller scale, be them the past and time (such as a lifespan), or even simply a physical observation which, if you consider the age of the universe, you can assume that this same pattern is repeated on the larger scale. What is time, then? Time is the time that it takes for things to reorganize their self. In fact, time is healing--if something cannot be hurt, injured, nor does it die, then time does not apply to it, because it experiences no need for healing. There is no loss, so all that applies is growth and gain. This is God. God is the being--the perfect state of being that is not hurt. God does not need healed. Now, if you add more and more atoms and reproduce and duplicate things, then time is needed for them to heal, reorganize, and come together...now, will they be a diverse crowd of people? No, rather, they will come together to form a larger, magnified version. So, this is existence--there are echoes and similar states of matter, bodies, etc. are repeated again and again. So, whereby a single atom can be what it is, if you make two atoms, then the two atoms should form and function like a single atom together. So, then, you have a model of an atom, on a larger scale. They should orbit about each other, just like electrons in a single atom. Likewise, as you reproduce things so much, they will all form about and like a growing tree eventually blossom and reach its bloom. Like a growing embryo it will eventually become a child...but this just continues on and on as everything is climbing the tree to form the larger model. When this model is finished, the puzzle is complete. What then is the finished puzzle (the biggest echo/ripple of all the tiniest fractions)? It's a model of the tiniest part...so when you see the puzzle, you will see the truth, because it's a model of the tiniest truth. So, you see an atom forming solar systems, and then galaxies, etc. All of these are models of the smaller parts--echoes. Once you realize this, you can look at all the different states of things and realities, the paths, the forms, variations, etc. and begin to equate and discover the inner workings of things. So, when you see a planet, it is the equivelant of a sea of water. If water existed outside of a planet with dirt and whatnot beneath it, it should (and since we're using theoreitcal assumptions here, be them perfectly accurate or not in how they actually play out, bare with me), in essence, be a sphere of water. Does this make it then...not an ocean? No, just because it's a sphere, like a planet, that doesn't mean it stops being an ocean. Likewise, just because dirt, rock, metal, etc. are all heavy and sink to the inner core of the earth, that doesn't mean they are not an ocean. In fact, there are gaseous planets! So, you must look at things, be them local, diversely arranged, mixed up, etc. as, on a larger scale and the passing of time (in fact, an object is not simply inordinately passing through time, but time is increasing like a physical mass. As the future goes on, time is measurably increasing, so the age of something is actually progression and an actual treasure/possession). So, time is expansion--and when people think of somebody suffering, starving, etc. and deteriorating, this is where they begin to lose track of the laws of the universe, reality, and physics if they believe this is loss. No, suffering, etc. is actually gain. Why? Because life does not end in this present form. No, this is a pregnancy. When you lose everything in this life, the laws of the universe are not chaotically all over the place. The echoing and truths continue even in death--so if you lose everything in this life, you don't simply deteriorate into nothing...no, rather, you gain and grow. Why? Because there are aspects of our selves and being that we cannot necessarily perceive with the naked eye in this present physical body. The spiritual body exists with us too, because echoing and growth, life, spirit, etc. just keep going. There is no end. Loss in life is still gain...so, as time goes on, things increase. If you waste all of your gain on physical and earthly pleasures, like money, the "glitz and glamour", sex, food, etc., then the gain that you received from time has been transfered (the energy) into something that you are passing away from. So, your spirit is deprived. Likewise, there is never loss, but gain...and if you keep spending things on earthly things now, then your soul is going to reincarnate until it gets out. Why? Because echoing goes on--there are patterns and increase, as the model is built. A solar system is a larger, more noticable/closer representation/model of a single, tiny atom. Likewise, everything goes in and out all over the place in every which direction, expression, manifestation, etc. as, on the larger whole, it begins to complete and form the model of truth (the tiniest truth which is true big or small) with what it has. So, the entire universe is destined to be a model of the truth...by which it cannot be altered. Like ice (water) freezing in the atmosphere, dirt becoming compact through the force of pressure and "gravity", lava hardening, solids forming, stars, blac holes, galaxies, etc.--the state and model, that is the universe, is forming and hardening until it forms a tightly compact model of truth (or, the tiniest origin). And, you see this truth played out also in how we are shaped by our environments, how children learn from their parents, how children are born from parents, how we all affect and influence each other, etc. Everything is being modeled after what was before it--just like the recycling of elements, water, and even our own bodies. We all eat what was before us, we evolve to and with what was before us. Everything is constantly influencing and affecting each other...and, this tells you that the future is not blank, nor does it say that the future is imperfect or chaotic. Rather, the future is simply a model of what was before it--if you reproduce something, it becomes what was before it, until the entire number increases and a uniformity begins so that everything is working together, in unison, like a finished puzzle. Like notes to a song, they form music...so also the universe echoes forever with patterns. As I said, you can consider a gaseous planet the equivelant to a sea of gas...or even our own atmosphere as a sea of gas (a sea of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, etc.). We like a fish crawling beneath the sea...and the pressure increases the further beneath the ocean you go. This is why gravity's speed increases, because the pressure above us increases, I believe. So, whereby a solid object might appear separate from something else, we know that in the laws of the universe, this big giant puzzle, the gas above us and all our surroundings act as one. So, gravity doesn't recognize a single free-floating object, but the entire whole...because everything echoes. So, when a person is falling to the earth, even the air above them is considered a part of them, because it's all made of the universe--space, atoms, energy, etc. It's all the same creation..and if we die today, then maybe someone will eat fruit made of our rotted flesh (our dust) and then our flesh bodies become somebody else's body. There is no separation, all is one. So, then, if it all works together and whatnot and you consider the butterfly-effect as being true to EVERYTHING, and I mean EVERY SINGLE THING, be it your thought, an itch you feel on your left thigh, a tingle sensation, a breath, a leaf falling, etc. it all affects everything else as it echoes outward and helps to complete the puzzle (build the bigger body modeled after the smaller). So, if you want to theoretically assume that putting a tunnel through the earth means everything is going to rush and speed up the further it falls through and then stop at 0, you're crazy. Why? Because gravity exists solely on the body as a whole...so, as the elements in an object's body (such as planet) shift and form the finished product, you see that the lighter elements go outward. However, they are still part of the body, because the "element of space" is the lightest nothingness. The core is the thickest, densest, and then it fades outward. If you were to see the finished product of earth, it would be like a star--the compact core and then as the lighter materials, such as liquid, gas, etc. fade outward, it is like a star. The star is brightest at the center and then outwardly the light begins to fade. It's one big radiant structure--and I believe that this could be the finished universe, as well. The universe is one large star, whereby the densest/thickest is at the center and then it fades outwardly the further you go. This is like a bubble, as well. It's a uniform compact area in an enviornment. So, as everything is one giant puzzle, to theoretically claim a spherical body can have a tunnel in it and then gravity acts in such a manner is ignorant and wrong, because the greater whole (the big giant shifting puzzle, the material manifestation) wouldn't work. The planet would dissipate and fall apart, if it indeed didn't explode altogether. So, this is echoing. You see how something as tiny and seemingly pointless like an air bubble in the ocean (which, by the way, holds the power to even kill you if in your blood stream, so don't underestimate the value of things) can definitely be an echoing of form--so, a planet can be like a bubble floating in outer space. Original thread:http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=10253

Oh, absolutely, and while he was arguing with a theoretical assumption, I too chose to jump in and give my side by arguing that while theoretical and debatable, it can be debated even further to stop making flawed assumptions which can lead to manipulation and influence, but let us look at the larger picture and see the truth. Would it not be better to point out where there are flaws just in case somebody has been misled by these assumptions? Speaking of paranoia, why do you then intend to paint a bad agenda in my post? No, he argued using an assumption, and since he was pointing out errors and calling someone an idiot, I figured that meant it would be okay for me to stop a potentially destructive-influence of an assumption by pointing out the flaws in it and adding some truth. If all people knew the absolute truth of all things, we would all be free. Well thank you for understanding. Partly others, and also because you made me out to have a critical agenda.

No, because it doesn't physically work out. If you want to make gravity out to be then some little focal point(s) by which all things are moved, be my guest. If you put a tube through the earth, it's absolutely insane to think things are going to speed up and all of a sudden zoom to the center of it and then suddenly stop. We all know gravity speeds up the further you move toward the center, and I for one blame this on the surroundings above us--rather than moving closer or further away to a given center. Why? Because I believe the earth is like a bubble, and given the opportunity, earth would eventually settle the heaviest elements outward and the lightest up top--storms, weather, evolution, etc. are all biproducts (or, products, rather) of this process, as the larger whole (the universe) is likewise attempting to settle into the final state by which the laws are uphelp to perfection and everything is settled and fit like a finished puzzle. You guys are the ones arguing with people, and now that I come in and tell someone they're wrong, you act like I am somehow intruding. Isn't that a little one-sided? And if you too argued (I don't know, I didn't read all your posts in this thread), then you're a hypocrite if you claim you too are not doing the same. So why cast stones at me?

Thanks a lot! But you have not PMed me. Or do you mean after I send you the file? In this case, I plan to try to get in contact with you after posting this post.

No' date=' because stress is caused by energy. If hooks are hanging on a cliff, the dummy itself is utilizing some sort of gravtional energy--lest it be a rocket and shoot off into space. Its atoms are comprised, like our physical bodies, of the dust of the earth. To simply suggest that because your soul occupies that dust, that gives you the right to deny the dust as being of the earth and its being here, by which it has become entangled in the frictionous web called earth. There is a force of energy, and it's called stress, friction, and gravity...although I myself am attempting to detangle gravity and rewrite what it is and how it works. I disagree, because I believe physics are echoed...whereby you can equate different elements to that of other elements (i.e. a sea of water, a sea of air, a sea of dirt, etc.). To drop an object through the earth, it would depend on the states of the object to how far it would fall. For instance, a helium balloon wouldn't be happy with it and would go to its rightful, frictionous place up in the sky. Likewise, the earth itself is no sluggard. It isn't going to simply allow any old thing to fall into the center...why? Because, I simply doubt it's possible to put a hole inside the planet. If you did, the entire planet would combust like a balloon, or a bubble. Air would seep in where it isn't meant to go, and the earth would, like a cracked piece of glass, become a fragile balloon and bust...it would explode...and, furthermore, if you were to drop some lighter elements into the core, they too would most likely make the earth explode. I believe this is physically correct, and if you'd like to join the debate on the revision of gravity and rethinking of the cellestial bodies (I equate them to bubbles, and galaxies to that of drains or hurricanes in a sea of darkness), you can visit this thread: http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=10253 (edit: Okay, so perhaps it's possible to put a hole in the planet, but don't be surprised when halfway or so down you cause the planet to explode)

No, I deleted my own USER account, and when using software to reclaim data, it seems I cannot find a file which I had hidden or placed somewhere that included my vbulletin license information (which someone had bought for me, so as it stands I do not own their e-mail account to retrieve the information immediately myself through it). So, as this computer is using one user account, I was wondering if it were possible to somehow access old user accounts on this computer...or if anyone knew the precise method if indeed there is some alternate path/method to doing so (or if it makes no difference). At any rate, I have a zip file which includes my old vbulletin files, I believe (graphics, styles, etc.), and it's some megabytes in size, and I'd like to retrieve the files from it...if I have to pay an ungodly amount of money to get it back myself, I'd be better off saving that money and using it for other things (plus, I am at quite a crossroads here and don't necessarily have such money to do so).

Hi, I am wondering if anyone knows of any good data and file recovery software (free, and fully functional) that works in that it looks for deleted files (particularly files from another user on this same computer, as I deleted my old user-account for Windows XP) and finds everything from that user account. I also have an already recovered *.zip file, however, the file is unopenable presently by simply attempting to open it, so I am wondering if anybody knows how to receive the files that are in a seemingly "corrupted" zip file, as the file appears to contain some or all of the files, but it simply doesn't open up in winzip (or, at least it didn't when I tried). So, is there some other method of deencryption or something necessary to converting an undeleted file, such as a zip file, to being functional or salvagable? I would like the files in the zip file, and zip file is some several megabytes in size, so I do believe that the material and adata exists in it, I just don't personally know what to do about it and how to receive it apart from seeking help. Thanks!

If you didn't seem so "chop-chop", it would be a deal, because you're right, it is a feeling of unjust persecution, and I simply did not wish to go around accusing people of persecuting me, because that would have insued more problems, and they may have simply denied it and used it as an excuse to persecute and isolate me further. But, when a topic begins boiling and this boiling involves the overall conduct of the forums, the harsh and harrassing treatment of other people toward others, and a moderator gets involved, those using a forum should be willing to make room for such debates within threads, be them on or off-topic completely. I myself owned a vbulletin forums once and if somebody told me that I was being off-topic and should quit when a topic strewed into other sub-areas of discussion on things that are relevant (i.e. the atmosphere of the community), I'd be a bit annoyed with those people and feel unfairly persecuted there as well. Why? Because if I own a forum, and a debate arises about whether or not people are acting justly, I would for all purposes of keeping-the-peace find it a DESTRUCTIVE effort, rather than CONSTRUCTIVE, if people starting pushing and nudging me out of the way so that a thread could "get back on topic". Problems must be faced and fixed unless you want them to grow worse or remain.

I fail to agree that every person in power lacks corruption or fallibility. But, sure, if the Lord is willing (and he is), I can try to be more judicious in what I decide to post.

Because as a human among other humans, in a society where we all interlock, grow, and live together, I too deserve to be treated fairly, regardless if you think that because you own these forums and I do not that means I have no right to think or speak for myself. Sorry if I have gotten the wrong impression of you, but I think I am on target here, aren't I? You ask this because you are in power and I am not, right? So, then, reconsider, because if you believe I should play dead, that's a totalitarian and tyrannical desire.

I don't know about no use, but precisely my point. If your fetal spiritual body/form is in a womb and it's too dark to see, would not its eye be closed...? Would it perceive light? Tell me. Likewise, this is how things work (similarly). Our spiritual bodies, although they exist and we, the BEINGS (those who simply ARE), exist and we have access to them, they are still unborn...in the darkness of the womb. So, one cannot fully comprehend nor know the outside world of the spiritual life--although one can certainly begin to grow as a fetus and become a baby...and one can certainly mature in the womb. Likewise, we can be spiritual, but until we die, you cannot chauk God (the Father) up to not existing or whatnot. Just like our earthly fathers when we were inside our mothers' wombs, we too are infinitely barred from the outside world until we actually step into the outside world (be born). This birth is death. This is truly biological and scientific, don't you think? And likewis, if you too truly believed, accepted, and knew this, would yuo not be frustrated by others who constantly hound and oppress you, trying to make you out to be a wrong, out-of-place outkast or idiot? They try to make you shut up, telling you there's no room for your words...when, in reality, if death can be equated to the birth cycle itself of a biological form, and life to that of a pregnancy, is this not scientific? Shouldn't there be room for spirituality then in science? I find myself amidst those who think they know-it-all, and it becomes stressfully frustrating to constantly fall into the hands of ignorance--a band of brothers who form a colation to agree that anything spiritual is somehow absolute trash and worthless hog-wash, likewise shutting the mouths and enchaining millions of people who firmly accept, believe, and recognize the reality behind it. To go studying evolution, birth, the origins of the universe, etc. but then ignore the future and deny that death and the afterlife are just as real and existent as a pregnancy and life, but just as "in-the-dark" as a fetus to the outside light of life some 2 inches on the other side of its mother's skin, is truly unfair and destructive. Since when did the truth stop becoming valuable...? And yet there are many people who do just this: they deny the truth of death and the afterlife (the spirit), yet they tyrannically reign down their know-it-allism of just how much they know and can comprehend scientific material truths and theories, concepts, etc. but then while they have the freedom to express their selves greatly and grow in stature with this aspect of knowledge and expression, they deliberately oppress and abuse those who accept truths beyond this present life and that which is spiritual--which should be equally (and if not equal, then MORE) valuable than something like studying the composition of the atmosphere or a distant galaxy. Right? Does not a child look to adults (those who have been born and lived a long time) before their selves for knowledge and wisdom? Lest the child be stupid and fall into harm. So, then, wouldn't it be frustrating to be around people who are stupid and refuse the wisdom and knowledge of those who are older and have a lot to teach? We call those people rebels, and they're most commonly assessed to society's problems (crime rates, downfalls, and the like). So, then, if people go rebelling against spiritual things, why should we consider or I believe them to be any different? I consider them the same thing! They are responsible for the downfall, danger, and increasing crime rates of society. Right? The echoing of reality exists not solely in this time, but in the time to come and in the events to come. If we see the patterns and laws of the universe mirrored all over the place, be it distance (in space) or in time, in evolution, birth, and life, why then should death and the afterlife all of sudden draw up a blank and stop there? That is rebellious, frustrating, and those who frustrate and attempt to oppress and degrade it into nothingness are like those rebels who would more than likely spit in your face than obey the rules and advance to higher education, understanding, and growth. So while there are science-people who profoundly speak of all their intelligent knowledge, they don't realize that they are truly just another form of a rebel. Sure, they may not disrespect their parents like some rebels or go off into the more obvious materialistic rebelliousness like crime and drugs, sex, etc...however, they don't realize that their egotistical "high and mighty" persona and conduct is just as degrading, oppressive, unfair, and destructive (oh, AND rebellious) than those who rebel against other people. If a child were to rebel against its mother, would not that child fall into a downward spiral if it slothfully refused growth? Likewise, those who refuse spiritual growth are just as destructive (yes, DESTRUCTIVE). It's not cute and okay to let them go on doing so, nor reasonably acceptable, just because it has become a profound norm among people...because if it's destructive, then put an end to it--lest you grow up a child who refused to learn to speak the English language from your parents and other people wiser and more mature than yourself, refusing to learn to read, etc. and then fall into dissipation and intense frustration and stress. P.S. Sorry for the lengthy post, but I feel it is necessary, educational, and insightful. Please do not edit this.

You cannot solve the world's problems from without. The more technology and outward adornment you pile on, the heavier the weight...the heavier the weight, the more you simply bulk up like a weight lifter. Now, do we necessarily care about these muscles? Or, do we care about what is within? Only when you recognize that just like that body builder who is subject to atrophy, rotting, and death, so we too are interested more about what lasts forever. And, what is more beautiful? A loud obnoxious woman, or a quiet, gentle woman? You cannot pile the loud obnoxious techologies and call them intelligence and success...no, because success comes from within, like a quiet, gentle woman. You cannot evolve by constant outward pursuit and adornment, because such things do likewise atrophy. We are recognizing that the 80s pornographic revolution is dying off because it's nothing but a mindless, endless pursuit of trash. This is likewise where science is going and society, as we begin to look within rather than outwardly again. When you do this, you realize that looking outward was a mistake, because success and the roots come from within--like the roots that sprout from a seed. So, are we at a standstill? Not if you begin to look within--to find the spirit. In fact, a lot of things are moving in the direction of spirituality and whatnot, as even science has verified that a woman, using her spirit, can be proven to heal other people. This is not a fluke nor a lie, the scientists did not make this up. Do you think spirituality ends here? If we are looking for healing, why then would you ignore that which is optimal? Science is beginning to become unparalyzed when they venture into spiritual means, while other areas remain paralyzed because they are forming their lives around other people's hard work (which came from spiritual people, including Isaac Newton who even spent lots of time looking for a Bible Code) and scientific materialism, and now as they attempt to root out spirituality, they become paralyzed because they think they can take over people's hard work and ideas and somehow remain alive and kicking. No, you cannot simply gut spirituality away from science as it has been so profoundly a strong factor in many large scientific icons in the past and then assume you can somehow takeover and reshape everything to suit your needs. People still have to submit to the rules, because you can't assume that an airplane, just because you say it can, can fly without wings or a propellar or even fuel. Rather, you must follow the shepherd...

Perhaps it is because you do not realize when I am speaking hypothetically and generally. When I said, "you", I meant it as in general (a plural, as well). You did ask for references to people, and so likewise since the topic was a general reference to people, I figured you would understand that I was likewise responding generally...and, I suggest, it appears you lost track. Moreover, the quote was, "people go around refusing anyone the right to pursue further analysis". I did not say anyone is preventing further analysis, as you suggest, but that they refuse it. Such a thing is a person's conduct and behavior--when you go insulting, condescending, and/or particularly terrorzing people by degrading and ridiculing them and their efforts by simply suggesting whatever they're suggesting is wrong (as if you have all the answers and absolute knowledge of the universe), and then chauking it up to being "poetic", or, "short of poetic at that", then yes, you are refusing their right to pursue further analysis by attempting to intimidate them. Whether or not I care about your attempts at refusing, and decide to be Rosa Parks here and refuse to give up my seat to one who refuses my rights, that is my own life's story, now isn't it? Now that I have explained myself, and as it appears you were obviously mistaken, let's move on.

Perhaps the universe itself is a bubble. We can use observation on a local level to figure out what's going on on the larger level. So, perhaps the universe itself a bubble--a bubble of light and whatnot. The darkness and space is like the air...and the universe's light and mertial and whatnot continues to, like bubbles, float upward (or, as the model of things are spherical, then air would be floating outward to join with other lighter air molecules since a sphere's atmosphere is spherical, like the film around a bubble that confines the air). So, like bubbles in the ocean floating upward to join the other air, and then forming the bubbly atmosphere of the planet, the universe itself acts as such likewise...and you can see the universe doing so with blackholes as they twirl the stars around like giant hurricanes of light in an ocean of darkness. So, essentially the universe is like a bubble, and it is subject to popping (the big bang or whatever). As the light and things collect, just like bubbles float up to the lighter atmosphere, so the light itself or whatever and the entire universe is separating like a single planet. As they all collect about, they, like an atmosphere, form a bubble--the heavier elements within, the lighter without. And...then, of course, the space. So, then, what is the space? Perhaps the space itself is attempting to float outward like the air moving to form an outward bubble-life atmosphere...and then as this happens, until everything is uniformly in place, the bubble will keep popping and reforming itself so that the inward content will drain outward and everything will be like a radiant ball of light (like one huge giant star or planet--the heaviest elements and things in the center, then the lighter outward until finally all things are physically uniform and the puzzle is complete). So, imagine that the earth were finished. The heaviest elements would be within and the lightest elements outward...which is why the earth is so active as it is, shifting and reshaping itself until it can do so no more because the puzzle and composition is absolutely perfect (in-line with the laws). Life, likewise, is an expression or formation of this process...it's simply a pretension. The uniformity is God itself--the perfect unified puzzle. One cannot outbreak the laws, although forgiveness is an actual reality, whereby forgiveness itself is indeed a part of the puzzle and laws (so, if one forgives debts/energy and karma and whatnot, that does not upset the process of the puzzle coming together). Like a person gaining knowledge and whatnot and putting their thoughts and mind in order until they can operate strongly enough that the confusion is gone or almost gone, so the universe is in confusion. It is all scattered about, and sooner or later, like our brains which are echoes of truth, reality, and the laws will become clearer and complete (because there is no chaos, there is simply evolution which is the graduation of the laws, and things will always become more unified and perfect because the laws force it to do so, so God is perfect, and we, as pieces of God, are certainly not the "whole", so don't reason that our suffering and the harsh conditions in this world are somehow justifications for chaos...because, one must get down and dirty before the room is cleaned. Likewise, the universe is getting down and dirty before the puzzle is complete). See, a puzzle's fractions can be pieced together then they all collect and form the entire puzzle. So also the universe and its galaxies, big bang(s) and all this seeming "chaos" is not chaos at all. In fact, to me I see no chaos. Chaos is an illusion--just like some people are afraid of the dark and others are not (some people are afraid of spiders and others aren't). It's a phobia--and an unnecessary phobia as well. Sooner or later the puzzle, because the laws are perfect and irreversible will indeed become complete. Don't think, however, that God is incomplete or a mess. No, God is perfect. A puzzle, regardless if it is broken apart or not, is still the same puzzle. So, as God collects, this is evolution. God is not incomplete, but order comes about. And we, as spark or fractions (pieces of the puzzle) all contract, fit-together, and come and form the puzzle. Now, a puzzle is always ugly and whatnot until it is finished and put together...although pieces that are collected (or, places where light/spirit is greater/greatest, and where peace, love, and order are in place) can give glimpses of beauty and whatnot. However, don't be fooled, the best is yet to come. The puzzle is not yet finished...so, wake up.

And by the way, no pregnancy wants to end prematurely, lest the child be underdeveloped and defective (weak or whatnot). Likewise, the survival for the physical life of a species is dependent on that the longer the life, the more opportunity and whatnot something has for spiritual growth. The things about the spirit is that the spirit is the eternal form, whereas the physical is a representation of rank. So, being a shadow of the spirit, one can use many analogies and insights from this world to begin to connect with the spiritual truth...and as you do this, you also grow. So, whereas one person might be more intelligent than another here and so more consciously aware (while another person is so completely out of their mind that they see a rock being thrown at them and stand there without the inclination to respond and move), although both exist in the same world and existence simultaneously, the ultimate objective is to where the spiritual reality is strengthened in all humanity enough that we're all smart enough to move out of the way from rocks being thrown at us. At the same rate, if one can detach from their body and realize that it is not their true self, they can begin to recognize that all the cells, all things are echoed. So, whereas I might on a certain level/scale move out of the way of a rock being thrown at me and so avoid being injured (or, entering into a wounded/lower state of health), so likewise one might be able to attune on another level and scale to move out of the way of negative and harmful elements--whereby their cells will "move out of the way of rocks" and indeed begin to heal. When one is suffering of disease, it is because he is letting something release their stress, anger, frustration, and to indulge in pleasure on them by allowing them to abuse him/her by allowing that something to throw stones at him/her without moving out of the way. So, when one is suffering, it is indeed possible to be healed--one just simply has to be willing and alert enough to move out of the way of rocks being thrown at them...lest they be beaten to a bloody, paralyzed, and "helpless" state of being stoned to death because they fail to ever drag their self off the railroad tracks. So, whereas one person might know and understand everything about astronomy and another everything about cosmetics, and both seem to be moronic when it comes to learning the other, so likewise many people today are failing to acknowledge and realize that yes, indeed, one has to make the conscious decision to move out of the way of tossed-stones' paths...or, the railroad tracks. So, while one might be smart enough and understanding enough in everything about moving out of the way of a disease (healing), another may not or may be educated in other more spiritually attuned areas.

Ugh? What question(s)? I see only two questions, and if it the standard conduct of this forum that people answer any and every question regardless how petty and off-topic it is, then let me know and I will be more than happy to leave (as even the moderator seems to jump in with a rude two-cent warning for me for absolutely no reason). So, let me appease you, sir: For the same reason that considering that the earth is round and orbits around the sun gives children (and everyone who can grasp it) a very educational and accurate imagination and awareness of the truth and reality--that of the solar system. So, then, if the planets and gravity are very similar and analogical to that of bubbles, would it not be educational and make grasping the reality of the universe likewise more readily possible and much more friendly? I think so. If someone told me that at the center of the galaxy was a pyramid shaped object, I'd find that very educational and would consider that learning more. I am over 18 years old (I will have 19 years at the end of August). When you remain closed-minded and constantly terrorize people with seeming high and mighty egos, degrading people, telling them they don't make sense, they're poetic morons (perhaps not in these precise and outright harsh wordings) without a point, they're irrational, they're wrong, etc., you are indeed refusing people the right to further analysis. It's called ignorance, and for the sake of one's own immediate reaction (as I have been suspended and warned on other forums before for calling people ignorant and/or hypocrites, as if these words are by nature profanity), I seem to have suppressed using such terminology so as not to offend anyone, and reverted to pointing out that people refuse the right to pursue further analysis (chauking things up to simply being nonsensical hog-wash and/or rubbish, and you will find the term rubbish in this thread if you indeed honestly do care to go judging people for whatever reason it is that you do so). I am not here to cause problems, but I am not going to pretend the disrespect and oppressive stress here is constructive and anything other than stressfully unnecessary. Let's be mature, please. Not everyone speaks alike, but if people suggest some analogies or comparisons, it is rude to tell them they're stupid. Are you trying to scare people, intimidate them? Are you trying to scare them into submission? Are most people here children or something? I am new, so let me know...as I see lots of immaturity and degradation.

Too many people here are seriously disrespectful and ought to reevaluate their conduct and treatment of toward others (lest they find their selves in turmoil).

It's a little extreme for scientists to claim not to understand certain things, particularly gravity, and yet people go around refusing anyone the right to pursue further analysis. Yes, what if gravity is the same as surface tension?