The Bobster

I see. We don't hear this about White privilege though? Why can't we restrict attention to specific ethnicities? Thank you for posting a relevant hypothesis. You think Jewish money is the main factor? Interesting, I'll look into it. You also think Jews are more literate due to their history. Entirely possible. Do you view this as cultural, genetic or both? And you'll find modern Marxist anthropology is nothing but a series of frauds.

Heritability is the genetic portion of variance. By definition cultural/societal effects contribute to the environmental portion, for those non-genetic cultural effects. I'm really not sure what relevance your posts have. You oppose Trump and Brexit apparently, because "good" and "freedom". I tried to steer you back to the OP question. Doesn't seem like you have anything relevant to say. And thanks for the pop-psychoanalysis. I'm "brainwashed" because I disagree with your half baked irrelevance. Forgive me for lol'ing. Hint: you're supposed to counter data before calling it lies.

I was informed by a mod that a thread on "White privilege" would be OK after criticising Jews. Kind of odd I know. Then I thought, if criticising Whites is OK, why not Jews? Kind of back to square one. And when looking for data on White privilege, I found massive Jewish privilege. Spooky stuff.

My OP contained two claims and two pieces of evidence. That's more than some people post. Usual tack is to challenge claims/evidence. Let's not be dishonest here, we know why the thread was locked.

Academic enrollment is affected by politics and immigration. "There's still a gap though and I think that's almost entirely down to factors earlier on in their life" is a claim about heritability, ie. genetic portion of variance. If you stop slandering me I won't need to respond.

Oh, there's a mountain of evidence. It's just you locked the thread before I could post any. Perhaps I wasn't surprised. Still, organised fraud in academia is a valid topic. At least on a science board with intellectual integrity it would be. Extremely important issue. Touchy though right? Kind of scary. And no, ethnic subversion isn't necessarily a conspiracy. It can be more organic, even subconscious. But then, it can be a conspiracy. "Conspiracy" isn't some magic word you can use to dismiss any organised activity. It really doesn't matter whether you call it a conspiracy or not. Of course the pseudoscience is certainly linked to the ethnicity. You think it's a coincidence that Boas stacked the board with Jews pushing Marxist pseudoscience? He could have done that with Japanese Buddhists or Bangladeshi Muslims? Just a coincidence I suppose. Marxist theories which fracture White ethno states are of no political relevance to Jews? What hypocrisy! It's you that is playing games with semantics, thinking labelling something a "conspiracy" makes it magically disappear without looking at any evidence.

This thread is about White privilege in academia. You said you knew why "certain groups", it was "well known", got "life chances". In the context this can be taken to mean you know why some groups are privileged in academia. Is that not what you meant? If it is, why? Nepotism? Genetic IQ? Culture? If it isn't, you are being irrelevant. Which groups are most privileged? You claim to see a problem, what is the problem exactly in your view? You consider unilaterally opening your borders to the point where your people no longer exist to be "good"? I guess you're entitled to your opinion. Do you think Jewish and Asian enrollment should be capped? Maybe replacing half of them with native Mexicans would sort things out, or at least be a step in the right direction?

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy

Are Jews privileged in academia? Is there any indication of nepotism in college admissions? Does ethnic bias ever influence science? How do we establish ethnic bias in science? Finding cases of academic fraud and correlating them to ethnicity would be one way. Are there any examples of Jews doing this? If so, is it a conspiracy? Some data to get the ball rolling.

Do you imagine that people in Saudi Arabia and China "vote for the common good"? Do they even vote? What is your view of "the common good". Sounds subjective. Would one way mass immigration to only White nations be a "common good"?

You wrote: "it is well known why some social groups do not get the same chances in life than others". Sounds pretty relevant to ethnic privilege in education. So tell us.

Really? And why is that? It's kind of the point of the thread. Do these people, White people who vote in their ethnic interest, have any justification to do so? Do other ethnicities ever act in their interest? I see. So you imagine behavior genetic findings. Which ethnicities are most privileged in the USA? There is some data in the OP.

Fascinating that this whole board is a political minority.

Interesting. You think heritability is set in childhood, and not that it increases over time. Any reason you think that? Which ethnicities are most privileged in the States?

So it would be entirely inappropriate to shut down a discussion where somebody brings up a case of ethnic bias in academia as a conspiracy theory for two reasons. Ethnic bias, possibly subconscious, isn't a conspiracy. Shutting down discussion before considering evidence clearly isn't the sign of somebody interested in evidence. It's the action of a closed minded bigot. bigot ˈbɪɡət/ noun: bigot; plural noun: bigots a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions. How ironic.