Tahir Gorgen

I will explain what dopamine is. Because there all wrong with this and I will prove this here. I'm in an queue but this is important knowledge. Antiphychotic medication for example, block the dopamine recoptors. The reverse effect you get with the use of cocaine for edxample, hyper and more. Chocolate can effect that the brain receptors would make free more serotonine. This will make you happy.

Only with the same speed, they would have a combined velocity, but I am not going to tell this, because I want to be wrong once. I hate this queue

Edit: difide the velocity with half times the mass and than difide it with the root of the speed^2 you had. If you set the velocity of 2 diferended masses. You can calculate and figure out yourself, if you are right with v1+v2=v3. I have tried it and it did'nt make a sense. Mass1+(the mass of an other body/object)+ mass2=mass3

I think the topic starter misunderstood kinteic energy. Maybey I think this because of my bad langueage. You can calculate the mass, if you know the speed^2 you had and mass with a velocity. (You just divide the velocity with the mass and then take the v^^ (root) of the speed^2 You can do it yourselfs and see If youre rigth. You can say m1+m2=m3. But v1+v2 is never v3. Btw velocity is a worth they grant in kinetic energy, for objects with a mass and in movement. It's not it's speed. Maybey some one else can explain this. The difference between speed and what kinetic energy and velocity is?

Ps: to learn themself to change the negative thougths in positive, is another thing.

Do'nt like psycho analysis. Diagnoses are more important in mental illnesses. And let himself or herself see, and to have more positive thougths. Depression= less survivalinstinct. Due to circumstances or it's due to him herself. Maybey there is nothing and he she thinks that she he is depressive because everybody seems to be. Let's say he/she is lazy. Or even I could be an a dip (nihilisme Nietzsche for example) so there is nothing with you.

I gave + to both. I agree with you. I have to speak/write within facts

I go with the others. Have no id about boson quarks and more

Well I know earths Gravity to. Sorry for this. The pull is due to it's rotationspeed and because of it mass it has an strength. Other particles (upwards push and towards pull) affects this. Mass have density and kg/weigth is only the illusion that matter gets in an G field. I could explain more and open an worthless topic but they could understand and make fun of me and aim this in the future theirselfs and know why it's true. So you only have to worry about the earths Gravity, when the rotationspeed will be faster what never will be or can be, for what the topicstarter aimed of. Edit: I want to ask you all a question. You warned me for this. Gave me 5 minusses and putted me in queue? Lol you all do'nt know the gravity of earth. The topicstarter is worried about that earths mass will increase and it would pull Saturnus and more in it's atmosphere. (I explained earth's Gravity in this part above. Did not meanchen about resistance because the resistance is due to the upwards push and the towards pull of the atmosphere and the density of the other particles)

Herschel found the uv. He had an prisma and an thermometry. He measured all the colours of the spectrum of ligth. Uv the not seen 'colour' had the highest temperature. He discovered it when he layed the thermometry near the blue colour of the spectrum to do something else. When he came back he saw the highest value. Infrared is near red. So the heat is less. So we can measure uv at least as this. I observed and saw the flora act. I know the 2 factors for the heat of the ligth of the sun. I do'nt want to offend others but they didn't know. I explained this to. So I do'nt know what you all want me to back up. The cause is the warming up ofcourse. And it is due to us. I learned also back in 1988 about acid rain on school.

I could not have that speculation because I learned on the Rsg in 1988 about water. Density at 4degrees heaviest. Dm^2. And more. All now water can't be heaten more than 100degrees celcious. Or should know. O 1000grams and not Celsius. I wrong youre right. Lol I realy have difficultys to understabd you all. I explained uv and the 2 factors of the heat of the radiation of the sun.

I said climate change CAUSE and not REASON. The cause I explained. The reason I gave the question for free.

What do you want me to back up? Ask the question. If you have not the question I am rigtht. You all are pushing and I gave you the question to ask. The why of climate change. So what is youre and others their question for me? You can push me to get out something you do'nt have even the question for. That is not a discussion.

No. I aimed that KNEW more than others and shared. And others know more than me. I could learn that to Btw what do you want me to back up? 'Their lest disered particles that absorbe more the ligth/radiation'? I am not going to learn and explain the why. That's there work. That is the question to ask and the why.

I know. I am not mad. But anyone else can make an input. I opemed this topic and shared. That doesn't mean I know better and others not

I am right with my aimings. I am not going to share my thougths about orbital variations. If I combine my own knowledge and aim this: in the past the twisters began at a earlier point to the equator and there where stronger. You have to understand without my sayings that I mean that this is due to earths own orbit. On it's axxe. And more. The moon was near earth. Further on there is mutch more. I know a lot of evolution. I saw at once with the tiktaalik that it had eyes above and short leggs to push him in undeep waters.. Some parts of historry. Egyptian histoy for example. Their calander. Forget wikipedia. They had an calander of 4 seasons. 12 x30days. At the end they offerd to their Gods. If sophet the sirius star would not been seen it could mean that there would ne plages etc. I think that they were afraid of an multi universe. Can you understand 30x12= 360days and only 5 more days to see the star sophet? It could mean that earths rotation around the sun was shorter than now. Ps:they build the piramides with robes. I looked to the pi of it. Drag the large stones over sand and trowed oil over it. In the sand there were trunks. Tree trunks. This all knowledge is so beautifull. And not all know this. So orbital variation climate this and that. What do all really know then? More? And some aimed something above about prehelion and aphelion. I explained why the summers are warmer and the winters colder in the south half with those 2 factors and did not aimed some thing else than what he did with ap and prehelion

Youre right about this. And this the point: no one did take me seriously with this in 2014. But they now this. So theire aimings are changed. Because of my explanations. But they ca'nt aim this because they know it's mine. We had to measure it over a longer time period to see the changes. But about the prehelium and aphelium and to figure out how many photons there will fall in aan mm^2. With the sun at it highest point. Does it not make any difference for the strength of one photon. You can always divide the value in an mm^2 by any nummer to have the rigth amounth. More clear sky or less does not make any difference, I mean. But I shared my thougth. That's all. But.. just the effect with the past I ca'nt prove. Because there was no measurment. What some can prove with this, is as I said before on this topic. Esa had mapped the bad climate and the atmosphere above the indian ocean and a part of Australia as the baddest. They could and can meausre this accurately on the surface now. With sensors. Here you go: https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=esa+map:climate+change+2014&prmd=inv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwimvOuvgI7RAhXbeFAKHUwcC-kQ_AUIBygB&biw=800&bih=1280#imgdii=zxLO4TvBY2hYWM%3A%3BdZBrfaJuhFw53M%3A%3BdZBrfaJuhFw53M%3A&imgrc=dZBrfaJuhFw53M%3A And they aimed: earth's magnetic field is weakining Reason? They said: The magnetic poles are going to change places. Switch.

Do I have to answer this? Do'nt feel offended. (All the colours of the ligth of an spectrum have other themparature values. Ir is near red. Uv has the highest) But I have another thougth. If we measure the strentgh of an photon. And say whe could measure the strength of ligth in say mm^2. And do this in an aphelium and prehelium with the sun on it's highest point. We could know how many photon there falls on it. Hey this is verry fun and important. I am the king of the beggars. They sended a plane with an atomic clock and more to prove Einsteins id/theory. No comment for this and others. Mine are cheap to do. Just need an sharp shutter for the proof of corioliseffect for the dummies. And a prisma and thermometre for climate change cause. Etc

I like it when I get - as above. I think + shoukd be an appreciation. I have learned you all many new stuf on this topic. And you gave me minus. Let me explain. Youre aiming about 1370 watt per m^2 for example. I said in an prehelium the summers on the south half are warmer and the winters in an aphelium there colder. This is because the sun is at a distance of 0,98ae. The most close disctance to the earth. The warming up is due to 2 factors. I explained this in 2014 in holland and it is still there. I was smarter back then. No one before me did. I didn't saw it and had red learned so mutch.. One of the factor is that when the sun is closer there will fall more light in an square (m^2 as you aimed) on the surface than when it is at more distance. Second factor is the uv. Uv is found by Herschell. With an thermometry. It has an heat and when the uv is stronger, it's themperature ill rise.. So we have nothing to aimings of you about 1370 watt etc. Because we can measure it with an prisma an thermometry more accurately than youre aimings. And this is also my prove of this topic 'climate change cause'. Take a prisma and thermometry. And just measure it. I explained a lot in the past. If they were smart they had meausured it now for at least for 2 years. Whit this story and making fun of Obama that wanted to gather 100billion dollar for climate change (back then I said:'he wants to pin the magnetic north that there isn't and use clean hydrogenbomb) and Esa, I got rid of that thougth in physics. When are the magnetic poles going to change places? Btw. I now a lot but I now more not and have learned from others you and wikipedia and all. So any one else could know the second part better. I aimed to that there isn't enough of the desired particles that absorb sunlight. So maybey the ozon is thin. Maybey there isn't enough place left in the atmosphere for these. Maybey we do'nt give the planet the time to heal. I didn't surch for the answer, because I shared a lot more and do'nt want to learn all myself and share as a dumbass (because I can't held my mouth and instead of profit I lost a lot) So you all may share youre thougths. I will read Thanks for the minus above. In the past I gave myself the minuses. But logically the heat of the uv of the not seen 'colour' the ultra violet would have to rise. I am not going to google if some one had aimed this before. I am sure about is

I think the theory of everything (general) is the reality that we have token for sure in our mind. Mental disorted ones, in psychoses for example, have difficultys to accept there reality. This also due to their sences. Logic needs the information. Let me explain us. We are born with parts of dna of our parents. Carl Custaf said that childs are born whit fears as the dark. I do'nt think he was right. We are born whit our survival instinct. In the dark we can't gather information so well for example, that can make us affraid. As that Descartes said. I want to prove my helthy mind and brainstorm in the second part with only my healthy mind. But do you understand what he was aiming? He wanted to prove his healthy mind to brainstorm without gathered knowledge that could be misleading..Without all the information we gather over our life period, we have nothing to think of. So we gather knowledge/information and with our survival instinct and our sences we got more feelings. With this and the gathered information at the moment, we make up our reality that for some (people how are the victom of their own logic as those in psychoses) difficult is to accept. This all makes our reality and I am also pointing to some because they need understanding.

Good for them lol

Some aim the Green house effect. And the worth agglomeration. I do'nt think anyone knows it exactly. I myself have not tried to understand it or learned to understand it. I also can't imagine why I must or shoud or can understand it and anyone else not. I said it before. The problem to surch for is in the atmosphere. But I have also regretted that I made this topic after all. That's all. Can some one imagine, that I share this and didn't follow physics since october 2014. So I do'nt know how far they are and I am aiming something after more than 2 years.

I can remember but can't find it now. I will. They mapped global warming above the indian ocean and near or a part of Australia from above, with satelites. It would be accurate with sensors on the ground. Think about this. Does the distance of the sun to earth, effect the uv that reaches the surface or earth? You could say yes because in an prehelium the sun is at 0,98 ae, so the summers are more warm and in an aphelium the winters colder than on the north half. You know why? Because when the sun is near there will reach more ligth per square. But the uv strenght/heat of it is something else. Without an atmosphere we would burn (I know. Thermosphere at daylight 2000 degrees and nights drop down till 500). Why do you think that the sun burns more in clear sky? I said it before Herschel found the uv with an thermometre and light is being absorbed.