Tahir Gorgen

I red wikipedia in the past and I am not aiming that they all wrong. If no one comes with something important or logically input, how can they know then? Look at global warming photo's on the web. They aim to send satellites to map them. There is a problem in our atmosphere. That's why the climate is as it is now. But why can't you all understand that the problem can be measured on the ground with an prisma and thermometre? If some one wants to know the problem, it's to find and to understand in our atmophere. Their less desired particles that absorb more as in the past. And btw, why shoud I share something that is known? From wikioedia or else? I opened my thougths. You all may trow it to the carbage can or something, I have no benefit of it. But first try to understand this. And we have discussed now about it, that was also important. Thanks. Bye

Hey it's almost an hypothesis. I wanted to share this with you and others. It's knowledge. If I say that I am rigth with this, you all would hate me and could have the thougth that it's my ego that I can't held in control. I loved this Btw I gave. You can measure the uv of the spectrum of the light at least as in the past with an prisma and termometre. I would like to have a prisma. Let me explain it more. Esa did send 3 satellites to measure it. Back in 2013. I said why not measure the cause, this on the surface with sensors. It had mapped what I aimed, whit their satellites. So am I not right then? Surch on the web please.

It is on an speculation part on the forum. I know that they aimed that the moon is so red because of the dayligths scattering. But it is the same with the sun. Prehelium aphelium etc and it's uv causes the (more) heat. About the flora. I think I was the first one that aimed that it knows that autumn has come because of the less uv blue of the spectrum of ligth. I thougth about it. Some know that flore needs the more red in it's flower period (weed lamp lololol they have to kinds of weedlamps in Holland. Their the best growers haha. Blue one and one that is more red. Good to know. I know a lot about the canabis indica and sativa and psychology to) but didn't know that the flora got the sign from it.

It's the uv. The moon is near the horizon more red, less ultra violet/blue. This is because particles in our atmosphere absorbe (a bit of the) ligth. It's due to the path of the ligth. It also has to travel a longer distance in our atmosphere so it is being absorbed more. So is it with the sun. Easy to understand this. It affects a lot. I have not thinked so mutch about climate change because I do'nt care anymore. They spend billions of dollars but didn't understood/know this and more. I will keep the rest for myself. But one I can explaim. Good to know. Flora knows that autumn has come from the more red less uv/blue and the shorter dayligths. I takes/needs/absorbes less nitrogen to make it's chlorofyl. I observed in Holland 2014 that some trees almost skipped autumn. Here in Turkey it's the same. If you understand this you will be understanding a lot more. As why the temperature change is nowadays so hugh when the sky is clear and not, when we look to the past. Ps: you also can measure the uv with sensors on the ground. From the heat of it's spectrum. Herschel founded uv back in 1800 with an thermometre. These are my thougths and findings. All may aim or say their word. I only wanted to share this and am not going to discuss it. Thanks.

You want to see my id to? Lol Maths as 3+3=8 or something. A sharp shutter can prove it, for anyone how can't imagine or understand this yet. The question is this. Did you all not thought (the ones that know better) that s ball would bend to the rigth on the north half? Well it doesn't bend when you trow it to the east or west. The target will drop down or rise wile the ball is underway. When you trow the ball to the north it will not bend to the rigth but to the left. I explained it and even not physicist could understand the coriolis effect now and know it better than the rest, because I am sorry to say but no one did understood this. Yes the ball or bullit will continu to move eastwards. But the world is not flat. So in the timerange that the ball hits the target the target eastwards will drop down a bit. Than you had aimed to it before. So that's why you have to aim below from west to east. That's the effect (earths rotation) of coriolis.Can anyone imagine if I had explained the force itself? Why the low presure upwards push (as with earths Gravity) on the north half is to the rigth. The towards pull (as with the Gravitational pull of earth, of the atmosphere) the high presure is to the opposite direction. What I have to make trough. Well you all know it better and I do'nt care I have time. Those on wiki and Gaspard know better lololol I think that this is enough for coriolis. If I may. I am going to explain climate change couses in real. Obama wanted to gather 100billion dollar for climate change. Back in Holland 2014, I said: he wants to pin the magnetic north that there isn't and use clean hydrogenbomb. I had lol back then. And explained the Climate change couse. I am going to make a topic about it now. They putted this topic in the speculation part. I will make a topic in this part of the forum.

Please read and try to understand my last edit. To understand coriolis effect in real. You are not the only one in the world how didn't understood it.

Well why do'nt you explain me the coriolis then? Or some one else. Here are some facts of mine. No one said that it didn't make any different where you stand on earth. This means that a ball (nof effected of the force itsels so an heavy ball) trown on the north half to the north will bend to the left. Because earth rotates to the rigth. And I am rigth with this. You all thougth that that ball would bend to the rigth, didn't you. There is more. I am the first one that aimed that because of the rotation of earth. The east will drop down and the west will rise, while an object is underway. Do'nt you understand this, whit a simply explantion? Why do you all think that they on wiki know all better. I am the first one with an simply and proper explanation. I figured out so mutch because I saw what others didn't understand or know. I can see this because I had learned a lot of the best. And sometimes it's an combination of knowledge. It's verry difficult to understand or explain. They thought that a ball trown on the north half would bend to the rigth. But when you shoot the ball to an object on the north half to the north. Earth will keep rotating and the target will move to the right. So the ball will have a path to the left.. even I have difficultys with it and I am not so smart anymore as in the past.

I was writing this and wanted the change my writings but saw that it is moved: Last edit: I'm not young anymore and have less energy left for this. So I will be straight. Facts: earth rotates clockwise. Eastwards.. where ever you are on earth, you will always be between the north and south pole. When shoot an object from north (for example from Austria) to the south to a target in the south. Earth will rotate to the left when we look northwards. So aim left, because wile the object is underway earth will keep rotating to the left. When we shoot from north where ever we on earth are, to the south to a target. Earth will keep rotating to the rigth, when we look southwards, so aim to the rigth. When whe shoot to an object eastwards, earth will keep rotating to the east. Wile the object is underway. So aim below. The east will drop down a bit from the rotation of earth and the west where we stand will rise. So from east to west, aim above. I stopped with learning thinking on october 2014. Only this one I figured out whit an orange a year ago. Took me 1 to 1,5 hour to understand. This is the coriolis effect. DrKrettin ques what. Now you know it for sure. So do many. No one did before me. If one can't simply explain it, probably he himself doesn't know it. You all do'nt know how I am. NASA Esa and Cern and others also in Holland had experienced me back in 2014. Any one may explain it now again in his/her worths. No one in the world did (edit. Worths also minus minus is +) understood this and the coriolis force is a bit more difficult. You may but cannot explain it. I did. And I am not a nobody.

I can explain but then all whould know/understand this. They explain it with balls on youtube on on childsplayground or with a plane but they theirselfes doesn't know/understand it. So any one who can explain this? If i explain it now, this topic would be moved I think. I will explain afterwards and I promisse even the average mind will understand the balls. Let's make it more interesting. In part one I will explain the balls and the coriolis effect. In part 2 on another topic I will explain the coriolis force and the gravity of earth. The upwards push low presure and towards pull (of the atmosphere) high presure.

I thank all for their comments.. I can only react 5 times a day so a discussion I can't have. Sriman Dutta, Friction is also resistance. Gravity is a Force and not resistance. The pull. All that effect the force (the force because we are the force in water for example) is resistance. I contacted earlier today the society for neuroscience, because this is also neuroscience. And asked them to read my theory on this forum. I will not share my oppinion about time dillation because I do'nt know what it is but I do'nt think that a bird that fly's at high speed carries an clock and sees at the clock that the time on that clock has slowed because he has approached the speed of ligth. Lol I will not explain coriolis then or climate change. I will open an topic. And ask the die hards to explain it. Because no body knows it and when I explain it easly all will undertand and make fun of me again, lol. I dare you all. Physics is also having lol and I readed the modarotars link. No need to get mad. A fine French gentlemen (Neil Degrasse Tyson) said once:'their no wild cows, in the wild'

My Dutch background. Grow up in Holland. They do'nt hit eatch other at high speed. And want to share a thougth of mine. There is no resistance in space. I some one can't understand how the speed in space of an comet for example could be x factor more. It approaches the sun and from it's heat/ligth, it warms up and sweats and leaves a dust. The ligth reflects (tale part) on the dust of it.

Philosophical: time is an measurmentstool of us to set the past, live the moment and to organize the future. I know Einsteins aimings and what he did to prove his theory. He sended an atom clock with an plane and aimed that time on the surface will slow to opposite to the atom clock that is in an plane with HIGH SPEED. Back in 2014 I was a bit hyper. And had the thougth of all. The planets etc etc and was brainstorming about speed etc. I know more about time because I experienced a lot. When we brainstorm so mutch and fast time seems not to pass as usual. It seems slower. This is my theory and I know I'm rigth because I discovered mutch more with this: Time IN space is the experience for organism of the moment that passes. Speed is related to the experience of time. We all experience real time (and space) so also speed, mutch more slower. Due to our place inside our atmosphere. It's also neuroscience. Call it evolution (no need to be hyper/useless energy use) or the Creators purpose. Birds for example experiences the moment that passes, even slower than us. That's why we could'nt understand why they didn't bumb at high speed. (They focus more) The Gravitational force of the sun for example. In real (time AND space) the rotationspeed is mutch faster than we see/think, so it pulls itsels and all towards to it. We can predict so mutch because.. I will give an example. Think of an bullet we shoot away. We play it in slowmotion and watch this in 1 year. The first minute we can predict where it shoud hit over 1 year. Time in space was quantumlogic. Quantumlogic= stuf our brain logically can't understand or see/be aware of. Ps: can't react till 04:46. I will share another theorys of mine if I may. Coriolis. Climate Change.

I lost my feelings for physic to. I understood so mutch more but cannot maynot explain tell. Modarator this is ontopic. I got in an discussion in Holland. I aimed that the universe is far more than 1000billion light year wide and proved it at the end. .......... imagine each one is a spot of the hubble extreem deep photo. 13,3b ly far. Btw i could put the sun at a distance of 13,3 billion ly far and aim the same. I saw many galaxys on that photo and had the thougth that it would have a wide of +/-100million ly wide. One photo. One spot that is entlargent by a telescope. How many of that spots can we put next to each other in our sight, if we look above? Say 4m broath.. 10.000 (hubble extreem deep photo spots in broath/wide)? Times 100million ly wide? The question can also be asked as how wide is the universe I know a lot in physics, but I am not an physician. I discovered so mutch more because I loved it. But can't tell all. Because I see and saw what is made up and where you/they wrong whit and of course there is crowdfunding. They make money and I have to shut upp and starfe from the hunger. Didn't have any benefit of all.

Well. I do'nt know if this also will be hi jacked. There is a difference between mass and energy. E(nergy)=m(ass times speed of the light or just speed in latin)c2 Mass is seen as weight/kg in kinetic energy. And ke is verry important. Back in 2014 I aimed that mass are the amount of particles in matter. And I kepped going.. these get due their density weight/kg in an g field. The gravity of earth for example= upwards push as in coriolis what I also did explain, towards pull of the atmosphere. Density of other particle some call air or wind resistance do affect this. If we had no atmosphere, matter would keep gain till it hits the surface and not set at 9,8m/s. Energy has a mass. As also in Einsteins first essay explained. 27/09/1905. 'Ist der tragheit eines korpers von seinem energieeinhalt abhanhig?'. Translated: does the innertia of an body depend on it's energy intake. Btw he describes in der analen der physics 2 bodys. 1 in motion that gives the energy in an close system of and another 1 in REST (in rest it's not about kinetic energy. It's about innertia) that absorbes the given of energy. Sorry if I wrote to mutch or oftopic. I will tell explain the truth and vanish for ever on this forum. I saw that all were lost in 2014. With Cern. 500 universities over 50 countries. On youtube. So I tried to make it fit as it is for others. I know a lot of physics and more and shared this. I know about crowdfunding. But you all got lost. I had no benefit with all this. I lost even a lot and a part of myself. Climate change for example in 2014. I had lol. Obama wanted to gather 100billion dollar. I said: he wants to pin the magnatic north that there isn't an use clean hydrogen bombs. I had lol. And.. explained climate change couses: ligth is being absorbed. Particles in our atmosphere absorb ligth. The moon is near the horizon more red less uv/blue because the path of it's ligth (second part of climate I have not explained) and it has to travel a longer distance to reach the surface so the ligth of it is being more absorbed, less uv/blue more red. This is also the sign that autumn has come for the flora whit the shorter daylights. It takes needs absorbs less nitrogen for it's chlorofyl. Back in 2014 in Holland and here in Turkey some trees skipped autumn. If you understand this. You will understand why the difference between warm and cold is so hugh when we compare this with the past and more. So you will trow this also in the trash and ban me or something.. byeee Edit: oo didn't know that

Hello, I know a lot of physics. Metaphysics. Phylosophy. I had to know all and the 4dimension time IN space was quantumlogic (in my words is quantumlogic, stuf our brain doesn't see or be aware of or understand). I will post a new theory and I know I'm right about it. It's also neuroscience. With my theory you all will understand time and more. As the Gravitational pull of the sun. That spins faster than we see/think in real (time AND space) and pulls Itself towards and all. I pointed also to time AND space, the difference between time in(side our atmosphere for us organism. Call it evolution or the creators purpose if you want) space. Edit: I am new and do'nt understand why you have hi jacked this. In the past i had explained a lot in physics. As climate change, coriolis, the gravity of the sun and earth. And more and this is only the physics part of mine. I thought that I had to introduce myself first. Without the understanding of time IN space you all can't understand a lot, as the Gravitational force of the sun. I could write in the section what time is: a measurements tool of us to set the past, live the moment and organize the future. Phylosophical part of it. I will keep quit.