Neuroman

That is not a way a person on the quest for learning something would reply. If you are just here to debate and try to show that you are something then I am in no mood of telling you if I find the evidence also.

We have to find out an evidence for that now. There is not much evidence out there right now regarding this. If you too can help me then it would very nice of you.

Do you seriously know how to reason? You are behind evidence. Reasoning is what we do based on observations and that's how science is created. Its not in your capability I suppose as how to reason. There is nothing I can do . Thank you guys for putting your point of view. I couldn't define the question that neatly but you all did give me some insight and knowledge regarding my question and doubts.

This is for post-materialism. http://opensciences.org/about/manifesto-for-a-post-materialist-science And the other part reagrding the age related related decline can be reasoned like this: The whole body keeps getting older and older everyday. This means that the brain too gets older and older everyday. As its said that the bran declines age wise i.e the the brain's performance goes down when you get older. As I mentioned earlier we get older everyday that means that the brain declines day by day. However we don't experience this when we are young since we are subjected to a lot of brain activity. Whenever an intense rain activity is performed the neuro connections hard wire and this is called sprout and at the same it sheds excess brain connections which is called pruning. If we don't reinforce these hardwire neuroconnections we risk getting pruned which means that the brain activity and this leads to a easier age related decline which reduces brain performance which can be pointed out to reduce intelligence and learning capabilities.

You have got an internet. Research in it. Don't ask me to put every link which I have researched into. I know you want to know more but it's better if you do it yourself. Who knows you may come to another conclusion and regarding the age related decline it's just simple reasoning. I cannot do anything if you cannot reason properly out of the given material. That article is itself enough but if you want you can go check out in the net. If certain things sounds like nonsense to you don't you think that whatever scientific discoveries have been made should be nonsense because once upon a time when they were presented, if people had thought that it was nonsense, it is not something is wrong with the scientist but something's wrong with the people. I suppose you know how to draw conclusions out of a given evidence and observation. If u want to prove your point of view prove it with your evidence.

Obviously age related decline happens and in order to reduce that age related decline you have to use your brain or else you go getting dumber and the brain doesn't remain agile. You didn't read the article deeply and understood it. I didn't mention very deeply about the age related decline but since you age everyday don't you think the brain needs to be kept agile as it ages since it has to survive till the end. I just generalized it. Please try understanding things deeply before commenting. Also the idea that the brain creates consciousness is highly debated and questioned and also another branch of science regarding this called the post materialist science is emerging.

If the brain was not a conscious object, how would the brain actually create consciousness? The answer further to this is unknown to me. If you know something regarding this , brief it. If you go by the intelligence of the brain it's " Use it or lose it". You will lose the intelligence of the brain if you don't use it implies if you don't challenge it by giving puzzles , or by math , or by learning a new language. If you challenge the brain its functioning improves and thus we improve the functioning of the brain.

This is a question, not actually a blog. Here it goes: If the brain creates consciousness, then it has to be a conscious object. If it is a conscious object then why should we have to improve the brain's mechanism by challenging it or else it would lose its intelligence; then the brain should be able to conserve its intelligence without letting the control of its conscious parts. We know that is not the case. The case is we have to improve the brain. We are conscious of ourselves. If that is the case, then who are we? What is our potential? I am looking forward for replies!!