JohnLesser

Why teach our children ''santa clause'' is real? A simple answer

Messed up quote! Whats the evidence

Take away religion and do you not think humanity would still continue in world aid?

Would the world be a better place without religion? A 100% yes is my answer.

Beyond the event horizon of a singularity, all mass experiences isotropic force from the singularity. The affected mass has its own gravitation inertia holding the mass in its own orbit. The singularity then ripping apart the affected mass from the opposing force of the inertia orbit.

Like in experiment they compare the measured time elapsed on their return to (A).

Taking a step back, do you have a link to this idea? By negative , what negative are you on about? negative charge, negative velocity ,

yes, you are defending nothing without dimension, where a spacial volume is made up of nothing.

Can I send a box of thought to you? Here it is, the words I sent. You are being argumentative over nothing, dimensions are something although within those dimensions, space ''itself'' is nothing but dimensional space.

Thinking about things.

There is of course an easy answer to this , the Universe is always silent unless there is hearing to hear it.

What are dimensions of space made of? Dimensions are something made of nothing when discussing space also, do you think dimensions are not something? You are relating something to things of matter only.

There is no contradiction in that post, do you personally think empty space is a myth?

I never suggested space is a thing of physicality, but it is ''something'' of nothing , having dimensions but no physical body. Your yes answer confirming I and your relative observation of ''free'' space. How can empty space be a myth when we can imagine taking away everything we observe except the space?

You don't need your eyes to observe space, do you have the ability to move freely? Photons can't bounce off nothing.

Something,anything, its seems you are in disagreement over definition rather than the observation. Do you not observe space ?

It's actually four dimensional , why would you think I said it was not? An unique property of space, not to space. Well quite clearly you understood so the problem with understanding is not how I worded it. Thank you for your agreement, "the only property of space is dimensions"

I do not believe there could ever be 0 space, how can you think that space is nothing when the unique property of space is dimensions? I think space is made of 0.

You are ''playing'' with time dilation but did not know it was a part of relativity then later on said along the lines of relativity works with high speeds and not a surface confirming you knew about time dilation was relativity to begin with.

My apologies I have been 'mislead' and was arguing fields occupy space. Fyi you are also incorrect, space is something, it is space. Moontanman Genius Senior Members 9,532 posts LocationSouth Eastern North Carolina Posted 25 March 2017 - 06:09 PM JohnLesser, on 25 Mar 2017 - 3:56 PM, said: Yes, they actually are space and everything else..

Meaning space is a field according to some, I believe space is made of nothing.

ok, I assume though this could be the result of ''energy'' fields rather than of space?

Intriguing, so these pairs appear then disappear?

Not at all, dimensions are observed unless you mean something else?