quickquestion

Without Love in my life, I go outside and say "What's the point." All is just colors of shapes and matter. The point I am trying to make is very similar to MattVSM's thread about how without positive emotions, life is without value. Let's say 1000's in the future we live in a sterile future that is worse than Star Trek. And in this future no violent instinct is allowed, and sex is not allowed, babies are bred in test tubes, and no competition of any kind is allowed, and everything looks white and sterile and everyone wears teletubbies/Star Trek unicolor uniforms without personality. If I was unlucky enough to be born in such a future, I would be a supreme villian. But if villiany was not allowed, I would continually disobey and not cooperate with society. Everyone in society would be raised and encouraged to do school, science, and mathematics, but I would have no interest in science or mathematics, or any type of school. My only interest would be to hate society. My philosophy would be, "For what reason do we seek to explore the stars, if it is of the same miserable stuff to which we are chained and aquainted?" In such a future, there would only be one reason to explore the stars - to find an escape from our current torments. Or to seek history and the past, to discern whether or not life can be anything more than what we were raised to believe.

Also, I would have to say, Pop Science often misrepresents science, and conveys information in a deliberately inaccurate way in order to increase the hysteria factor, and thus lies to the public.

Like OMG dude... He said you were right and then I said he was wrong for saying you were right... SO I LITTERALLY EXPLAINED WHY HE WAS WRONG FOR SAYING YOU WERE RIGHT. Get it?

Immortality is not the same definition as invincible, which was already addressed in topic but I guess you didn't find it important enough to read.

Ok now you are just clowning around on the funny boat. You are changing "definitions" when it is convenient for you. It's like, if I say a cheerleader is the lead of the parade, you'd say No, because she isn't made out of metal.

Do I really have to explain why he's wrong? He literally said that people who kill animals for fun have limp penises. Despise means a kind of animosity towards someone, after they violate you. Good and evil were made up words so that primitives would live comfortable lives and avoid pain and torture. Thus anything which has an intent of torture or pain is said to be evil. Thus keeping animals in cages is more evil than shooting them instantly.

But shakespeare books are still printed and read, thus the words are still in use. In my other post I said there are lots of STEM terminologies that have double meanings or unintuitive, misleading names. But I said I can't remember them off hand.

Hate and love are two versions of the same fuel. Love is a fuel as well. Love can be more damaging than hate. Love, when turned toxic, becomes hate. Thus the Aphrodite legend is the goddess who wishes for Earth's destruction. You ever loved someone, only have them abuse and or reject you? Worst feeling in the world. Lots of powerful individuals have come in power through hate alone. Whatever it takes to be famous. Fame=power. Love can obviously be used too, it made Jesus famous.

Thankyou for suggesting this. That should save me some trouble of having to google this on my own.

Doing so would increase my libido, which would increase my sexual frustration, which would increase my depression. Speaking of which, I can't stand all these love songs on the radio. It feels like a bunch of imps are torturing me.

Well PM is not the same as skype because it is slow and congested. Skype is more free flow and it does not suffer from an inbox limit. It only takes a few seconds to make an account, so perhaps after Easter we can chat on there if you like.

Does gene therapy only change organs, or can it cause mutations such as changing physical apperance, gender, and or species?

I thank you, but I feel emotional aversions while socializing and am afraid of talking to people with my voice, due to being a textbook psychopath. I would rather talk in skype if you like.

Better doctors takes better money.

I already aced algebra 1 and 2. What I am looking for is to get extremely good at all manner of theoretical science and or advanced science, including college level physics, neuroscience, and biology.

Depends on your definition. I view 10 years as an experiment in progress. Also, the attitude of many doctors is to scoff at any side effects I mention to them, as if they have the unshakeable attitude that their meds are fully safe.

Cool. This should make things interesting.

Didn't mean to negative 1 your post, my mouse glitched. Anyway, I am sick of being a guinea pig for corrupt politicians and corporate interests. I used to take the pills everyday but they didn't help. And in the future I don't wish to take meds everyday so doctors can use me to test their experimental medications.

this topic is meant to discuss, scientifically, different approaches and viabilities to immortality. Immortality, refers to the state of continued physical health. It is not invincibility, which means that someone cannot die. An immortal person could die by being hit by a train, for instance. 1. I am trying to find whether or not increasing Stem Cell reproduction will grant immortality. (If the reproduction rate exceeds their death rate.) 2. Some theorists say High Oxygen environments will double lifespans. 3. I am trying to find out if there is a way to surpass the Hayflick limit. 4. Fourthly, my hypothesis is that telomerase does not actually promote cancer, because it will also increase the longevity of anti-cancer cells. Thus my hypothesis is that by simply raising the level of telomerase you will drastically increase lifespan.

You must be joking me. You call that logical, straight to the point and accurate? You can't be serious.

True.

Their definition is vague and even they say sociopath and psychopath is overlapping. They also say the word has contradicting definitions. Difference between computer and AI is that AI is a subset of computer. The kind of computer he was referring to was a simple tool. Now an AI is able to make intelligent decisions of it's own, it is not simply a basic tool. Now if an AI became so smart it could make intelligent decisions indiscernable from a human, we still would not know if it was a pzombie or if it had any awareness inside of it.

My mother was a teacher and so if I ever was to be a teacher I made a gameplan with myself of what it would be. Colleges tend to be more lax and allow teachers more power in creating custom courses. So I would basically just lecture and email my students, but only do a couple quizzes and I would give real life problems for students to solve on their own (such as, build a vehicle that must pass the performance requirements, lego robot, etc.) If a college made me follow a dogma and rigid course setup I would not try to teach there.

I have not much faith in this, but I am very open minded so I would like to try and to beta test this technology. Also, I would like to mention Stephen Wolfram's excellent math expertise, but his automatic music generation program did not make very interesting music.

Im too tired to google and research nrf2 activators right now. I trust you are expert enough in the topic to tell me the right blend of amounts I need. Just tell me what ingredients and amount of ingredients I need in a smoothie and I'll drink it.