quickquestion

2. I thought sqr(v) is the same as v2. What else could it mean? one. So if 1 is true, then the PE is false because of what I said earlier. 4*9.8*9.8!=2*9.8*9.8 And yeah I am sleepy. So I made a mistake in #26. So we can agree on point 1. But i still think PE is wrong because. 4*9.8*9.8!=2*9.8*9.8

But this is a blatant contradiction. You just said my theory is 100% right.

Official KE equation is 1/2mv2 I wrote 0.5*m*sqr(v) imatfaal's equations seem to imply that both m and sqr(v) should be multiplied by 0.5. this is the descrepancy. 1/2m looks to me like .5m. But apparently it means that it applies to the whole thing, not just m.

The motions in the GIF, will be following the equations of motions according to Einstein. It will help you to visualize why I don't believe in Einstein.

My theory implied no such thing. My intent was to imply that the moon only caused a subtle subliminal effect.

Intelligence, is not really a correct means of determining awareness. Bored people, are often bored because they don't wish to participate in intellectually stimulating activities. But boredom, is a very intense form of awareness. Same with pain. Feeling pain, I am very aware. But the amount of pain someone feels has very little correlation with their intelligence level.

Ok, so what about this though. Let's make it even simpler and give a situation with zero air resistance. On earth an object will take 1 second to fall 9.8 meters. PE equation is mgh. Lets say mass is 4 kg, gravity is 9.8 m/s and height is 9.8 m. So it will tell me PE: 4*9.8*.9.8 KE=.5*m*sqr(v) KE=2*9.8*9.8 These do not match. So what am I doing wrong? Or is the equation itself, wrong? Since bullet experiments in water proved KE is correct equation, then I say PE is the wrong equation.

Well why not ban both. Let's say FGM is worse than Circumcision. Ban both.

I am going to stop you right there. First error is you said the Electron passes earth at earth clock's 8:00 AM. But in my example I said it would pass at 8:06. I don't even know how you are getting this backwards-time travel of 7:55 from. I'm going to cook up a visual GIF example of what I'm saying, and it's going to be nice. Currently I have to deal with a lot of annoying and enraging social entities outside of these forums. It is making my anger levels astronomical. My extreme anger is slowing down my ability to make these GIFs. But I am going to try to make these Gif examples.

Google tells me terminal velocity is 54 m/s and height to reach terminal velocity is 450 m. I dont know how you got 93.95. That is nearly double. I did not know air resistance could reduce the velocity by double like that.

A thought experiment using logic and reason. Sadly I don't have the tech to measure electron collisions. Strange Ive decided it will be easier for both of us if you debate me on this issue in the other topic. I have posted some relevant response to you in the other topic just now.

Yes yes and yes to your first arguments. To save time I just wrote it quickly. Yes if a spaceship was next to you with the same speed, the clock would be going the same. And no light does not always travel at C. Space is not a complete vacuum. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html But lets make this and change the context of the argument. Lets say an electron moves at 99.99999% c. Now replace mars with a piece of cardboard. Now can you see the paradox. For the electron the cardboard will never move. So the electron will be in two different dimensions. If the electron is fired at 8:00 AM, and if the electron had a telescope, it would see the clock of the cardboard pretty much stuck at its 8:00 AM state throughout its whole journey. but the humans will see it actually take 5 minutes to reach the cardboard because C is a finite value. and if in human space the cardboard is moved at 8:05 AM, But the human observer will just see the electron pass the moved the cardboard and reach earth at 8:06 AM but to the electron's POV, it will collide the cardboard before it ever moves. and thus a paradox. Also I'm aware scientists put a lot of work into GPS. But there could be an alternate explanation. What we know is that it correctly predicts aging. Perhaps the aging of atoms age less. But time itself does not change. Just the frequency rate of atomic interactions and collective entities. And I will get back to you on this pulsar thing because I dont have my books with me right now.

perhaps I should rephrase it as "emotional telepathy."

Think it was some African tribes, so not Hopi or Amondawa. Zulu if I remember correctly.

Languages have varying complexity. Some primitive tribal languages lack abstract concepts such as words that describe Time that is not in the present. (no future/past kind of verbiage.) if dogs had a language, it would be caveman language. Dog eat...eat good. Squirrel. Chase squirrel. Chase...good. Bark = Open the door because you left me outside. For this reason, dogs never evolved much talking other than barking. Emotions would serve the same purpose as their simple language. Emotions are a simple, yet somewhat complex language. Somewhat complex because they have so many subtle nuances. Like smells or music.

Time is a navigational piece. Like fast forward through a movie. If solipsism is not real, it means you fast forward through your life, forget it, then enter someone's body, and go back to the state of matter of 10 years ago, but from a different perspective. Essentially, time is just changing perspectives. Through time we can see 3d space. Absolute time does not exist. But coherent states of matter do. Two people can see the same car. Thus they know the car exists.

When solid ground wibbles and wobbles, I consider it to be fluid-like. But furthermore I think aether also fills the shape of its container. There are annoying babies constantly whining in the background, so I am just going to assume you are right for the time being, until I actually take the time to review your calculations in a more pleasant environment. In which case, how do you explain the "passing through mars" paradox I stated earlier (It was in this thread I believe, but if you can't find it let me know.)

Pe=mgh bowling ball of mass 5 kg, height of 450 meters, gravity of 9.8 m/s. Ke=0.5*m*sqr(v) velocity after 450 meters is 54 m/s. ke=7250 j. pe=22050 j. So its a bit suprising, I thought ke would be more than pe, but still they do not match.

This is another fallacy. Seems fallacies are like the default. I never said everyone else is wrong. Nor did I imply that all words have wrong meanings. Actually, many if not most would agree with my definition of Fascism.

And this is where the fictitious part comes in. It says PE=height*gravity. But KE=.5*m*sqr(v). On impact it will return KE. The KE will give a much higher value than the PE allots. And the PE will not yield the same results as the KE equation.

I corrected myself later on and said what I meant by fluid, was that it has fluid-like behavoir, like an earthquake.

My definition of fascism has depth. I dont just go to a dictionary made by the resident authority. I say, how is fascism as I see it. The amount of reasoning I use is very high. The amount of reasoning society has is very low. If I complain about the world, I am met with accusations of being a teenager, mentally ill, etc. It's all very predictable.

No. My praxis is that I deeply suspect that PE equation is borderline fictitious.

So are you admitting you are displaying tendencies of teenage angst.

The science book i read said that the main thing you have to factor in is the distance from floor level. Not its Cog.