quickquestion

I didnt assert anything. I said I wasnt sure and "could be". Do those words sound assertive to you?

I already said the proof is on Google. But you want to be facetious. I said the proof is too traumatizing to share but you want to ignore my pschological needs. I say the proof is on Google, but guy says he can't bothered to go on Google...somehow my thread gets closed. Typical.

I'm saying it's audacious to expect that we are expected to obey the definitions of your worldview. I define facism in my own terms, and when my terms dont fit your terms you say I am the one moving the goalposts and not you. This is an audacious thing to say, because you literally want me to abandon my interpretation of fascism and embrace yours.

If that is the case, then I don't get the definition of PE. Because it violates the equation of KE.

I answered the majority of your points. To answer your last point, one thing that is being repressed is to punch people who irritate you.

Then why does aether have to be a form of matter.

Not giving a shit is a specialty of the human species.

Well may I ask you this. What form of matter is light?

At this point, you are irritating me. I already explained that you can google it, but apparently you will not, so I have nothing more to say.

Newtonian physics is an approximation. Useful for making crude ancient weapons. PE is useful for dropping watermelons. Actually, I'm not actually sure what it's useful for. What, exactly, is it useful for? Science textbooks have a lot of nonsense in them. Like saying nobel-prize pulsars prove Einstein.

My underlying praxis is that, science has gone off on a tangent, and they have solidified this tangent with Einstein. Consider it like the ancient greeks, they had great mathematicians and philosophers, Plato invented a thing called shape of matter. He said Fire was a pyramid shape. And this was a tangent that they based their science on for centuries, and they solidified their tangent with so much mathematics and logic that when Democritus came along and said Plato's theory was false, noone wanted to embrace his theory of atoms because he didn't have the power to overturn years of mathematics devoted to false conclusions. Either Im wrong or Im right. I proved experimentally that time-dilation is a paradox. This should be at the very least, enough. Whether or not I can over turn 100 years of society's best savants devoting their work to false ideas is another story.

First of all, I am trying to figure out what energy is, scientifically. Because my science textbook says PE=height*gravity. And KE=.5*m*sqr(v). But if KE is an exponential function of v...how then can PE be simply linear height and gravity.

You can google it if you want, but it may disturb you for life. Thus I wish to not view them or post them.

I dont pay for the Wifi.

What im saying is if America is Fascist, but a Alaska is not Fascist, I can still say America is fascist, even if the fascism doesnt cover 100% of the land. Just how I can say something is Grape Juice, even if it has a little apple flavoring added to it.

Incorrect. I think the examples of planets you thought of in your head are positioned in incorrect ways, so that you dont see the absurdity of time-dilation. For example...if there was a planet (Mars) imbetween a star and earth...the planet would freeze position and the photon would see itself collide with mars . But earth would see mars move out of the way, and the photon would hit earth. So the photon would be in two-different dimensions.

I am poor and an ethnic minority. You argument is shallow and repetitive. It's like whenever someone complains about problems in the world, you just say "Stay calm, dont be an angsty teen." Well maybe we are sick and tired of being calm while incompetent bureaucrat politicians do nothing to fix anything.

They haven't been nice to me, so of course not. But on facebook I try to be nice to them, and they aren't nice at all back.

Not fully sure aether is a gas. It could be the 6th form of matter. My theory of aether is in the early stages. Aether's drag is difficult to calculate. Expect more equations when I am less depressed and opressed. For instance, I went to a church full of those born of engineers and some were better at math than me. I continually tried to reason with them that god was cruel, eventually, that god did not exist. But they would all reject my arguments and ostracize me. I believe that this stunted my feeling of a social connection with them. And that had I felt a more positive social connection, I would have been better at math because when they taught me it they would feel like a friend and not an enemy. Math is a form of communication, and lack of positive social faith dampens my instinct to want to communicate. It was a feeling of...they are better at math, but what has math done for them as human beings? They are cruel and believe in false gods. This dampened my worship of mathematics. My nonsense has a very connection to reality so listen clear. SR says that if you look at time OUTSIDE of a capsule, it will slow down. So, if I am going fast in a space shuttle and look outside at a clock, it will be going slowly. This does not refer to the visual effect of photon delay alone, but that it actually is physically slower. At 99.999999999999999 c it would not be hardly moving at all. Time would "stop". Photons in space go 99.99999999999999999999 c. So if time truly "stopped" they should be colliding with planets in the position of when the photons were first launched. But instead, they collide with planets as they are now. Who'd a thunk it. Time dilation, being a god-substance that is not needed. Puslar's steady pulse can be attributed to that C is the max speed of light. Time dilation is not needed. 1970's Nobel Prize for proving einstein, but einstein was not proved by this nobel prize. Assuradely, you have many things which you want to prove einstein by, such as GPS. I will get to them later. There is a lot of clutter in the attic, and I have to clear things away, one by one. So I will disprove the most obvious false conclusions first. If you cannot see this then I don't know what to say. But I am cooking up some examples and visual diagrams which will further disprove time dilation.

Yes.

True, but we must also think of the AI's feelings. If we create sentient AI that cannot feel, then we may create specimens which are perpetually bored, but with no way to report their own boredom.

My point is that I am grown up, and that humanity, by and large, is not, and does not want to listen to reason. I give reasons about injustice, but everyone goes on not listening and defending their own injustice.

You are right but also wrong. Porn is taken as a self-centered kind of psychology. People keep the porn to themselves. It is not part of their social brains. As a society, society says porn is off-limits. And this is exactly my point. People dont want to have porn in society because sensing other's extreme happiness disturbs them.

I dont have enough money to visit china and prove it on my own. If the photographic evidence of activists isn't enough to believe it, then what is? Apparently photographs are not enough evidence for people.

How am I not pointing out something wrong with society? It is arrogant to say that I am not. Please provide argument and proof to your claims that I am not pointing out something wrong with society..