Handy andy

According to string theory it is the only theory that includes all known forces, I do not wish to defend their claims, as I am still getting back up to speed on the maths, and I am in know hurry. Space as we know it has 4 dimensions one space and one time. Fred perhaps only has 3, 2 spatial and one time. You are confusing the fields that exist in space as being separate from space. Read the pdf I posted by some Australian academics working in the field of astronomy, do you disagree with them as well. Space between galaxies (points in space) is increasing. Scientists talking about Black holes have in the past claimed space will disappear or contract in the blackhole, photons of light are bent by gravity By examining the amount a photon of light is bent by gravity, it may be possible to infer the rate at which space is shrinking towards a planet, sun or galaxy. If it can expand it can shrink. I never claimed space contracting around a black hole would give you a blue shift, but since you raise it, it is an interesting concept, as space will be retracting into the black hole any light moving towards you will be moving at light speed through space that is moving away from you, and will be blue shifted perhaps only appearing as gamma rays. electron positrons pairs when they annihilate give of a gamma ray with circa 511eV of energy each. The Feynman diagram was a quick stab, I had not remembered the particle/antiparticle pair production but it does make sense, thanks for that. You may be aware I am going from memory some of which is fading. What I had suggested about the black hole was if there is a singularity then any light being forced into such a space might become a particle, which when destroyed outside the black hole could return to being gamma radiation(photon) again. Wave particle duality is a nonsense, all things are waves, of different shapes, some open ended some looped around etc this is the same in string theory as well as particle physics etc. Thank you all for the replies, I am learning a lot from this thread, even though it is considered to be Trash. The pdf I posted could be used as a reference document for people on the expansion of the universe I found it very interesting, even if you all do not agree with its open ended conclusions. (Ref the ionization thread I started under amateur science and projects, does anyone have any ideas on the separation of ions in a very hot gas using a magnetic field. I have given up hope of getting help on analysing maxwells equations and incorporating relativistic effects via the Lorentz equations with the circuit idea I have. I will work out the maths myself in time relatively speaking.)

With out space there is nothing zip nada. Space is a a substance it can grow and shrink, warp and distort, do you think that a distance is fixed in space. If a distance changes between two points sepparated by a substance the substance is changing evolving growing. What part of all forces exist or are transmitted by space do you think is misleading. Without space there would be no forces nada zip diddly squat. I called space the aether as it amuses me I recognize the aether means different things to different people and could be confusing . For me it is restricted to WTF is space . String theory would suggest space has more than the usual 4 dimensions, and can unfold expand and contract. Those same strings appearing from different dimensions of space form all matter and all forces. String theory is the only mathematical theory to include gravity. It is a mathematical monster, with numerous possible outcomes, and may never be completed. Background radiation and the expansion and contraction of space however might be proof of string theory. Nothing exists without space for it to exist in. Radiation appeared in space as space expands. Matter decays into radiation, quantum matter appears as if by random from radiation colliding, occasionally this matter has sufficient energy to become real matter, after a few trillion years particles coalesce into gas or a plasma of sorts, then Plasma theory kicks in, and it beats the crap out of the concept of all matter appearing from a singularity. I am know space exists I know it is expanding and contracting, By demonstrating it can change space is a substance. By examining the amount a photon of light is bent by gravity, it may be possible to infer the rate at which space is shrinking towards a planet, sun or galaxy. My ideas evolved after studying the pdf I posted. Space contracts around a black hole is the popular science view. A Particle can decay into a gamma ray, if contained in a singularity or collided with another high energy gamma ray it could momentarily appear as a particle similar to Feynman diagrams.

I understand combing the Lorentz equations with Maxwells equations I should be able to make progress on the relativistic maths, I will work this out myself, it will be a good mental exercise. Ref the concept of ions in blast furnaces, does anyone have a view on separating them and collecting them to improve the efficiency of blast furnaces or power stations.

Yes I agree with the red shift on radiation, I only speed read the attachment the first time, I have now studied it, and fully agree.. The concept of expansion however is in a state flux, there are various theories around. The concept of the big bang is hugely misunderstood and not helped by popular physics books or websites. My reading of the pdf attachment above is that the big bang is interpreted as an expansion of space, not the origins of all matter as popularly put forward, I do not view the expansion of space as being the origins of all matter. I do however view space as being a substance with possibly more than 4 dimensions as I think is validated by the attachment and current cutting edge theories. Space it seems can expand and cause an increased rate of expansion in the universe. Conversely it can contract as demonstrated when sucked into a singularity or black hole, similarly if a black hole can cause space to contract, then so can matter, even if not on such a noticeable scale. Red and blue shift is affected by the expansion of space, light can therefore be affected by the contraction of space. Gravity appears to bend light, possibly through the contraction of space towards a mass. Matter may in actual fact cause space to contract, or absorb space, causing the apparent omnidirectional gravitational stretching of space. The stretching of space explained by general relativity, may in fact be the contraction of space around mass. With no mass around space expands. This would be a simple explanation of how gravity works in the universe. Space expands behind a photon and contracts in front of it. Space may also contract around a particle. The only other conceivable way I can see gravity working is a vibration in space emanating from each individual molecule, and is more trapped in a fluid idea of space rather than an expanding or contracting space. In all instances thinking about gravity the only conceivable way of understanding it, is that space is a substance, it is not devoid of properties, as popularly put forward by many. Space whether expanding or a fluid is the source of gravity, and stating space is the aether may be annoying, and Michelson and Morley failed to detect it. If they had understood the expansion and contraction of the universe it would have been self evident. The experiments were void because they did not understand the aether or space. Matter when it is destroyed gives of radiation, Not every nobel prize winning physicist agrees with the big bank concept. Space when it expands may give off radiation, when a dimension unfolds are ceases to exist. Cosmic Background radiation may be evidence for the expansion of space not the origins off all matter as is claimed by some big bangers. This is equivalent to when matter is destroyed it gives off energy as radiation. When light is absorbed by an atom the electron goes to a higher energy level, when it loses energy it gives of a photon of light(radiation) At the quantum level when two gamma rays collide do they momentarily form an atom, similar to when two particles collide momentarily forming another particle before splitting and going on their merry way. Philosophically thinking of the origins of the universe, what came first infinite space or zero space, perhaps both existed at the same time, giving rise to extra dimensions we can not perceive, perhaps these are dimensions being explored in string theory. Which seems to be bound in boundary conditions, and is a mathematical bloody nightmare with thousands of possible solutions. To be more annoying Would anyone disagree that space is a substance, it has properties it is expanding and contracting can be warped and twisted, it carries all known forces and is the source of all matter and life in the universe. Would anyone deny that space is the ether and makes up all things.

I am easily confused however I found this pdf. It explains the misunderstandings and where they come from regarding space. It also explains how space is expanding and can also contract, and Andromeda etc. An interesting thought occurred to me, ref the expanding space and red shift. What happens to a photon of light in contracting space and blue shift, if space shrinks to zero locally around the photon what does it do DOH I am travelling for a few days now and will not have access to internet for a while. I have loads of new stuff to read and some good pointers. The Hawkings book I initially disagreed with is so out of date, it is practically worthless. Thank you all, for your answers. Andy Additional edit Some questions have sprung into my head, as a result of the attached document. If space has no edge, is it infinite, how can it expand beyond a none existent edge ? Space can move, change shape, expand, shrink, be warped, or stretched. Light that is redshifted appears at lower frequency, disapears or ceases to exist, or be measurable. If space can expand on a cosmic scale, can it also contract around a wave with sufficient energy and make it into a particle. Using the blackhole concept, space is shrunk down to nothing. Would a photon become so blue shifted it becomes a particle? Electrons are particles that have no known shape, but have polarity and spin, which "might" infer they are a dipole and have a shape and dimensions, similar to a donut. Can radiation be viewed as an expansion of space from a particle with no dimensions as a result of the particle being destoyed? Looking at the double slit experiment, and wave particle duality, is it all just contractions and expansion of space. (Vibrations of space(aether) or strings) With space oscillating a wave or particle into and out of existence. A particle occupying a zero space trapped in a vortex a wave occupying a wavelength and free to move in a straight line. Cosmic Background radiation is not red shifted as far as I am aware. Could Cosmic Background Radiation be the result of a continuing creation and expansion of space, and not a big bang. Contracted space, decaying into expanded space. If space can be warped, twisted, made to vibrate, move around in the form of waves and particles(vortices). Is gravity not just another movement or disturbance in space as a result of the movement of all the different types of waves made of space. The disturbance being greater nearer to the particle or waves causing the disturbance. Can we create a similiar disturbance artificially in the direction we wish to move and create a gravity driven propulsion system. LineweaverDavisSciAm.pdf

Sorrry I added a bit to my post above whilst you were posting The space between galaxies is increasing at above light speed, and c is just the maximum velocity we can percieve. Under relativity every situation is considered by relative velocities of objects, particles, people(george and gracie), galaxies etc with reference to each other. So a galaxy can move away from us at above light speed, and conversely must be able to approach us at above light speed, even if none have been detected. Andromeda is blue shifted, is there a max to blue shift before it cant shift any more?. Would we even be able to percieve matter galaxies approaching us with a velocity greater than light from another inertial reference frame, if space was contracting between us and it at above light speed.

I know but it is approaching, and will collide spoiling everyones day in a few years time, and since it is approaching it must be blue shifted. Special relativity applies only to inertial frames, which has me a little confused. Does this mean only where gravity exists. All particles are subject to gravity. In the vacuum of space I understand there is matter, all be it not very dense and therefore there must be gravity between these particles, in the expanding space. Can someone explain. The space between galaxies is increasing at above light speed, and c is just the maximum velocity we can percieve. Under relativity every situation is considered by relative velocities of objects, particles, people(george nd gracie), galaxies etc with reference to each other. So a galaxy can move away from us at above light speed, and conversely must be able to approach us at above light speed, even if none have been detected. Andromeda is blue shifted, is there a max to blue shift before it cant shift any more. Would we even be able to percieve matter galaxies approaching us with a velocity greater than light from another inertial reference frame. DOH

Hi Thanks All for the replies. I am still a little confused between inertial velocity and the speed of galaxies in relation to each other, as I imagine others may be. I fully understand the ABCDEF description above. But am guessing special relativity only applies to inertial reference frame locally, not on a galactic scale. If this is the case how does it stand up in an accelerating observable universe I am getting more confused, and am resetting to a none detectable ether string theory. @ Mordred Thankyou for the explanatory link ref apparent velocity based upon the recessive velocity formula and actual inertial velocity which relativity uses. However the link doesnt work http://tangentspace....ocs/horizon.pdf could you please post again. @ Strange How is Andromeda not blue shifted. Are you stating you dont believe Andromeda is coming this way or that the Blue shift is nonsense and should be ignored. Again thankyou all for the replies I find this incredibly interesting.

Thank you for stating the above. I was trying to keep the question simple, so as not to lose focus. I am not familiar with the magnetohydrodynamic generator, so will look it up. Apologies for using the word frequency instead of pulse train. How much does seeding a gas reduce its ionisation thresh hold by.? This is something I considered but could not get a handle on how well this would work. I know all wires are inductive I measured typically 10nH/metre would you agree with this figure. I am considering building a circuit to ionize air, not using brute force, but by trying to use a current impulse. Before attempting this I would like to analise mathematically the circuit I am considering. I am considering using a high speed DC pulse train, and trying to shorten the pulse duration of the pulse by forcing it to bunch. I am considering two parallel wires, what will happen if an out going pulse passes an incoming pulse? Will it cause the current to bunch momentarily. If not then I need to look at different methods. Tesla developed the bifilar flat pancake coil, which if straightened out, it is two parallel conductors, it is this coil I wish to investigate further under pulsed conditions with a very fast pulse train. This Bifalar pancake is used only in circuit boards today as a low inductance resistors, as far as I am aware. This was not its original purpose, as indicated on Teslas patents. I know I could use a variety of methods to generate a high voltage. I was involved in building a Tesla coil lots of years ago on which we achieved 1.5MV. I will look into all your suggestions above further. Thank you very much for your reply. The purposes of what I am thinking about are two fold. The first is can I come up with a more efficient way of ionizing gases. The second is a little more interesting: Can I seperate the ions using magnetic fields and extract useful current. If I can, then this idea could be expanded into some more interesting areas such as coal fired power stations blast furnaces etc. Anywhere flames are produced the air is ionized. When the atoms cool down the electrons recombine and give of photons. Blast furnaces must be full off ionized charges, and it may be a neat way of improving the overall efficiency of a system by returning some power.

They They seem to have a recruitment drive at the moment, they like to target universities, and celebrities. You can apply if you like, apparently the initiation ceremonies aren't humiliating anymore, and it can improve your career prospects. The labour party was at one stage going to investigate freemasonry, but dropped it from their plans.

Bugger, you got me again The Nazi party benefited from it and won popularity, which they may not have had otherwise. They managed to highlight a the Jews as a national enemy, along with gays, and anyone who disagreed with them. Herman Gering WW2 "If you are not for us you are against us". Most people did not speak out, those that did, often wound up in concentration camps, or having to leave the country. Einstein being one those who left I understand.

Hi Thanks for coming back. What I am considering trying to achieve is an impulse emf in space radiating away from the source. Gamma rays and Xrays have very short wavelength and high energy, E=hf. They are also not good for the health. I want to investigate a possible current bunching effect mentioned by JJ Thompson, and "possibly" utilised by Tesla. When a current is switched off the current bunches causing a rise in electric field strength due to inertia of electrons. E= Q/(4.pi.E​o.r​) The local charge Q bunches resulting in a very large impulse voltage which radiates outwards. This effect is momentary and very fast causing ionization in the air, possibly only due to very high voltage, but maybe due also to a very short pulse duration, ie an impulse. The air glows when electrons recombine with the ionized atoms. This momentary voltage is difficult to handle and can blow up switching devices etc. Using 2 wires in parallel it may be possible to create a similar bunching effect. To create a pulse with sufficient energy to ionise a gas is not easily possible with todays technology. When two pulses of current pass each other in opposite directions, the magnetic fields will cancel, the local electric field will as a minimum double. What I want to try and investigate is will the charges slow in any way and bunch giving an intensified electric field, and ionize the air more efficiently, due to shortened wavelength and intensified voltage. Two straight parallel wires are the easiest thing to envisage, however Tesla utilised a bifilar flat pancake coil which he claimed was 100 000 times more effective at generating radiant electricity(ionised air) than his standard system. Many different coil configurations could be used to cause a similar effect, from simple loops to all kinds of knotted type coils. What I wanted to investigate first was a simple system. 2 parallel wires is I think about as simple as the idea gets. Except perhaps using a standard tesla coil and resonating a current up and down the length of the tube to create a standing wave or multiple standing waves. To ionize the air with any noticeable effect from pulses the frequency needs to go up, and the pulse lengths to come down. By forcing a bunching effect this might be possible. Tesla stated that he felt a physical pain when he was running his system, this sounds a little like the microwave none lethal weapon systems being developed today. Once I have the basic idea on paper, I wish to start and investigate separating the ions by modulating magnetic fields in the ionized gas, or using static charged or electron rich materials to attract the ions. Some one posted on the engineering thread area ref ionizing gases in a vacuum, I alluded to my interest there, however I wish to use very high frequency and very short wavelengths if I can create them. Bifilar coils with opposing currents on them have very low inductance and will allow me to pulse them at very high frequency with little BEMF. I take on board what you are saying about the valve technologies they were incredibly fast, I was surprised also to find just how fast the old crystal diodes were when I looked into them. I also fully understand the concept of using flat conductors in parallel to minimise inductive effects. I want to force the current to bunch momentarily to create an impulse wave, that may ionize gas locally. Two 100A current pulses with a leading edge rise time of 1ns moving in opposite directions at 0.5c is a little difficult for me to analise, my maths is rusty. But given a pointer in the right direction I can work it out for myself, it doesn't take me long to come up to speed on a subject I once new well. I am not sure if relativistic effects would come into the calculation, JJ Thompsons stuff was before Einsteins ideas. I want to push the edge of what is achievable with electric field strength and impulse duration, to improve the rate of ionisation in air. running the circuit in a reduced atmosphere is a good way of prolonging the ion separation, perhaps using different gases will ionize more easily. Putting the circuit inside a metal enclosure is also a good idea, to prevent microwaving myself by mistake. Yes If I use HV I wont have an issue with microwaving myself, but other people have done that already. The U tube link under the engineering section I mentioned above shows some good examples of ionization ethods and is incredibly interesting to me, albeit at this stage a little more basic than what I have in mind, I will monitor it and see where he is headed. Any tips on the maths would be appreciated, two charges travelling in opposite directions on two parallel wires how do the currents interact, possibly bunch(shorten wavelength) and peak(how how will the emf peak at.). I am looking specifically at the pulse interactions as they pass each other. A reflected AC wave along a transmission line will create a standing wave as it meets other waves going out. I am specifically interested in DC pulses travelling along a line. Andy

Apologies: When looking at the causes of the WW2 and the rise of the Nazi Party you have to take into account the history behind it. Starting with the end of the first world war, and the marshall plan which was put into place, and was extremely punitive. It was part of the cause for the rise of the nazi party in germany at that time. If the Marshall plan had not been so punitive the Nazi party may not have been so succesful, and WW2 may have been avoided.

I was happy with the expansion of space until someone told me it is expanding at 3c, not at 0.3c as I had originaly mistakingly understood. Do you have a web link that would improve my grasp of your belief. I note you have chosen to ignore the blue shifted question of objects galaxies moving towards us at enormous speeds. The Andromeda galaxy could just be a slow coach. What about space between us and another galaxy shrinking at light speed, or even 3c if it could happen, as was claimed by science geek. I understood years ago in hypothetical black holes everything is sucked in never to escape including light. Today gamma ray bursts are sometimes reported as coming from claimed black holes. Gamma rays are normally given off when matter is destroyed, this would suggest that black holes destroy matter and would therefore be in some way self moderating does anyone have any thoughts on this little idea. At what point does science breakdown. Ps my main interest on this forum was to try and get a pointer on the the ionization of gases question I asked, using two parallel wires to cause a current bunching impulse effect. Amateur science forum

So if the space existing between points is expanding at c this is OK. The galaxies being points are moving in reference to each other. Claims on the internet are mistaken if they state the universe is expanding faster than c and light disapears over a event horizon. If we see a galaxy moving away from us at c, but cant see another galaxy moving away from it at c this is ok. The planet moving away from us at c will percieve us to be moving away from it at c along with the other galaxy we cant see. What about the blue shift of things coming towards us like galaxies at light speed. Is there a limiting max frequency? If there is, what happens to a photon of light at this frequency if it hits this frequency. What am I missing

Controversially Global policing costs money, and attracts attention of persons policed. Global policing could be considered to be not in the interests of the electorate and tax payers living in countries paying for the global police force. If a government is not behaving in the interests of its people, it could be regarded as treason. No one elects a government to police the world, or initiate regime changes at the otherside of the planet. Governments globally could be considered to be committing treason, against their own electorate. Regime changes cost lives of innocent people who would be happier if they were still alive living under a dictator ship. Various governments globally could be considered to be dictatorships either benign or violently. The Shah of Iran was a dictator, who fell allegedly trying to modernize his country. He was supported by a police state. The same police state is still messing with politics in the region. The Nazis were anti jewish this is a well known and much published fact. They also apparently tried to irradicate masonry in Nazi Germany according to sites if you care to google the subject. Little known fact in America, WW2 started in 1939, America did not join in until 1940, when a U boat sank a passenger liner full off wealthy Americans possibly by mistake. Many of the German U boats that sank shipping around the coast of America were crewed by Americans of German descent, who came ashore went to cinemas ate in restaurants chatted with people, and found out when the cargo ships were leaving for europe. They then went out in the u boats and sank the cargo ships. Many U Boat crews had stubs of cinema tickets of films they had watched in the USA etc in their possesion when captured. It is a very interesting subject to look into, if you ever get the chance, there is a very good naval museum dedicated to the WW2 in norfolk virginia.

Thank you for responding in a sentient fashion That is what I thought and had been taught, in addition to which I was taught as something is accelerated to light speed it would attain an infinite mass and therefore couldnt happen. But it seems the universe is expanding at faster than the speed of light, I had thought this was 0.3c and had not given it much thought. I was corrected by science geek it is 3c. I googled it, and it appears at the edge of the visible universe where light is red shifted it diminishes and disapears from view over an event horizon, a bit like looking out of an apparent black hole Galaxies doing just 0.3c towards us would give of blue shifted light, I asked the question of how would matter or light be blue shifted from a galaxy coming towards us at above light speed, and what would happen if it hit us. The George and Gracie analogy often put forward to explain relativity and light seems to fall over under this reasoning. Does Relativity only apply in our galaxy, but when a galaxy coming towards us at approaching light speed hits us, things maybe go "big bang" From the many sites I googled it seems c is no longer a limit. But obviously within those galaxies doing in excess of c with respect to us. Life if it exists goes on as normal, and things are relative to their motion. Would the maximum frequency anything can be blue shifted by be governed by the plank length perhaps. How blue shifted can a photon of light be before it isnt a photon anymore or vanishes. Do they become neutrinos ??? confusion. Worse still could dark matter galaxies be hurtling towards that we cant even detect how can we detect something faster than the speed of light except by collision. Neutrinos are so small they just go straight through the planet. Does any one have any sentient views on the above, other than c is the max relative speed we can perceive anything at and anything above this should be ignored. If so what is happening at the edge of the universe:) Kind Rgds Andy Ps does anyone have an opinion on my ionisation thread I started under projects and amateur science. I was after a little pointer in the right direction with the math.

There is an elephant in the room no one has mentioned, ref global warming. Rephrasing there is a super volcano in the Yellow stone national park, why not use geothermal in the states, they use it in other countries and even small islands, monsterrat for instance. Question: Texas got rich from oil, why can the states overlapping the yellow stone not tap their geothermal, and get rich cooling the planet, via cheap electricity. ? Answer: The economy runs on oil, and the politicians think global warming is not an issue they need to be concerned about. Sea level rise has not happened as was predicted, because the climate change model was a little wrong. This is a an example of scientists starting something along the lines of a religious belief and now has lost the support of a lot of politicians and people, many still believe it, like ether theory . Scientists claimed we know best, and got it wrong, then never publicly retracted or altered the claims. Global climate change and Sea level warming will drive stronger weather on parts of the planet, other areas will have milder weather, it could all just be cyclical, has any one checked the claims of oil companies and lobby groups who advise politicians, and pay huge sums into election campaigns.

Accepted there are many different types of freemasonry, and the USA has a number of modern versions, as well as the older (rosicrutian being one). The american constitution stipulates freedom of religion, however today with vice president believing in creation theory, and president claiming extreme religious views also is a little concerning, especially when they have fingers on nuclear buttons. There are many types of freemasonry mostly secretive ancient and new. Trying to separate one type of mason from another when dealing with largely secret organisations, is a waste of time. They might as well all go in the same bag. Something I pulled of the official catholic website some time ago Lodges from Turkey to Portugal, from Italy to Ireland and Poland, Among the signatories are the Grand Orient of France, the Grand Lodge of Austria, Switzerland, the Grand Orient, the Grand Lodge of France, the Grand Orient of Belgium, the Grand Lodge of Belgium, the Grand Orient of Croatia, of the Grand Orient of Ireland, the Grand Lodge of Italy, the Grand Orient of Luxembourg, the Grand Orient of Poland, the Grand Orient of Portugal, the Grand Orient of Greece, the Women's Grand Lodge of Turkey and others. They call on the European governments to not only receive the oncoming immigrants but take more and more in the future. In addition, they are also making visible a constructive convergence with the official policies of the European Union and the majority of EU member states. From the above not only can you see there are female masons, but also they interfere in politics. The Scottish Rite of freemasonry was written about by Albert Pike in "morals and dogma" and whilst today freemasons have dropped most of there humiliating initiation ceremonies, they certainly had a few, which amusingly freemasons dont like talking about as a conversation starter. Rumours of the skull and bones club at Yale. 322 and the founding date written on their motif 1812 I think it is. Yale was a divinity college, 322 is a refernece to the genesis when mankind got chucked out of eden. This is of no great interest other than nearly all presidents of the united states have belonged to this club. They are regularly photographed with different skulls they have collected in group photos. The skulls are all different, one in particular was a very strange shaped skull, elongated, with a fracture down one side and a damaged eye socket. The only person I have seen in history with a head shaped like this was president lincoln who was assinated, and the autopsy report showed damaged eye socket and fractured skull from the bullet that killed him. Amusingly shamans in indonesia claim possesion of animal spirits that allow them to climb trees like monkeys, and head but coconuts thrown onto them from the tops of trees by there shaman monkey friends. The deities are kept in containers or skulls. The skull and bones motif is also asscociated with the Jesuits, a evil bunch of religious fanatics and liars depending on who you listen too. A typical way for a mason to have been put to death was to remove the top of his head if he had not been following instructions. The Kennedy asassination springs to mind here, where his head was blown apart by three bullets, or one magic bullet. One of the skulls used at Yale is a damaged skull which is used as a post box for voting. Whilst collecting skulls could be regarded as high jinx by a bunch of lads whi want to be members of a famous club, it is illegal in most countries. a number of attempts to were made to rob lincolns grave, he is now burried under concrete, a relative of his inspected his remains to make sure they were all there. Freemasonry only draws attention because it is largely secretive, and is involved historically in the manipulation of people, and control of governments. It promotes religion as being a good thing in society, when historically it can only be regarded as pure evil. Going back to the advent of christianity we have today, Islam excluded. Many respected academics have pointed out the correlations in the new testament and the Egyptian religions dating 3500BC. It seems likely "my idea only" that Emperor Constantine in 325AD, who was head of the roman empire, which had conquered egypt a couple of hundred years before under Alexander the Great, tried to unify the sun god religions with the hebrew religions in a empire living in religious turmoil, shortly before the collapse of the roman empire. The new testament if based on the Egytian religions is as old as the old testament. Interestingly in support of this one of the oldest written gospels is the Lindisfarne gospel, and the name Jesus is not even mentioned. The god figure is referenced as IHS which the Jesuits like to put forward a multitude of meanings for. Normally however under egytian religion this is Isis Horus and Sett or Sophia. The Jesuit order incidentally view the pope as speaking for god on earth according to their claims. The pope over rides anything jesus or moses allegedly said if they are not completely ficticious characters, dreamt up by high priests to control the minds and hearts of the people they would command. My view only "Religion and ancient secret societies are like some evil hand reaching out from the past trying to control people, they have no place in a modern world". People need to develop a better idea based on decent human behavior, openness, and mutual understanding. Rgds Andy

Buddha circa 500BC stated along the lines off "you must find our own light".

We briefly looked at the red shift and an event horizon for things moving away from us at above light speed. When things are moving towards us at above light speed how blue shifted can they get, before they become invisible to us. ??? Heavy elements can only be formed in super high gravitatinal fields or under immense pressure. What happens when a sun doing 3 times light speed collides with a sun going in the opposite direction relatively speaking. Is this not a more likely scenario for a humungus big bang that has most likely happened multiple times in the history of the universe. Stars in the Andromeda galaxy hitting stars in the milky way, may create some big bangs if they happen. The universe is a car crash, how could you tell the difference between different types of big bangs. E = mc2 seems a little lacking under this scenario. This is more believable to me than a bing bang from nothing, perhaps the big bangers just didnt see a galactic collision coming Any sentient thoughts on this would be appreciated.

I understand Japan was given no choice but to go to war with America. America was threatening Japans fuel supply or something like that. Also the US had advanced warning that Japan was going to attack but did nothing. The Teaching Company in the states have loads of lectures on this stuff.

Its not men only, their are female freemasons too. To become a freemason you must believe in a god, it doesnt matter what version, and be prepared to submit to their deity what ever that might be conceived to be. Alberty Pike wrote a book on freemasonry, it is freely downloadable from the guttenberg project. It is one of the most mind numbingly boring pretentious books in the known universe. The ultimate aim of freemasonry according to his book is to have a one world government, whereby everyone lives in fear of an after life, where you will be punished, if you dont do as you are told. The purpose of religion and ultimately of the mystery plays, according to Pike is to subjugate the human mind and soul. Oh and freemasons get to rule via devine right given to them by their god or something like ET, or deities maybe. The current version of freemasonry according to freemasons originates circa 13th century after the crusades. According to the Polychronicon the first lodge meeting was pre 4000BC. Freemasonry also has origins in the Egytian religions with the Egyptian rite of freemasonry circa 3500BC and the solar god myth concept. Basically it is a funny handshake club that most likely is responsible for most of the shit that is going on the world today, but they think they are a benefit to mankind. Like what did the Romans do for us, genicide torture etc was a good thing according to history. As for the devil analogy above this is metaphysics, and is lost in the mists of mythology and religion. Lucifer or Abraxus was on the seal of the templars. The Druze today still believe Abraxas is a good god thingy. They also believe in transmigration of spirits from body to body, a bit like born again christians and speaking in tongues I understand. Which is reincarnation without the messy rebirth, if you are into this sort of thing. Today freemasons would like to be considered as benefits to society, many politicians and royalty globally are freemasons. In the past freemasonry has been involved in metaphysics, and infact the rosicrutian freemasons are responsible for the current version of wicka we have kicking around today. The world is ruled by freemasons and has been for millenia. There is no conceivable way they will go away, they are embedded into law making and government, and are here to stay. All American Presidents have been freemasons, even Donald Trump I understand is Rosicrutian, which contrary to popular belief is not a religion. So dont crap yourself, it is the way the world works. They are working towards a one world government, and a temple in Jerusalem. It is better to knuckle down and believe what your rulers want you to believe. If you want to get ahead become a freemason and be considered a benefit to humanity. Pope Pius x stated the Jesus MYTH has served them well, it may be that all freemnasons are fully aware including the head of the church of england Queeny are fully aware that religions are based on myth but promote them to subjugate the masses. Andy

This is an extremely interesting start to your future videos. Thankyou for posting. Questions 1) When you create the plasma, are you getting an avalanche effect with more electrons being released in your vacuum, than you supply. 2) Have you considered trying to seperate the positive and negative charges using a magnetic field, to cause the charges to be collected onto seperate plates, within the magnetic field. 3) The negative terminal attracts the positive charge, have you tried using the negative terminal without an earth connection so that the electrons extracted from your negative terminal as they neutralize the positive charges arent immediately replaced with electrons from the ground. 4) Have you considered connecting to a negative terminal of a battery, to alllow this positive charge to cold charge the battery via electron extraction from the negative terminal. etc etc Andy

Aether theory was dispelled before I was born, or at least it was shown not to be completely accurate, along with Newtons equations. The aether was thought to make up all matter and carry all known forces. Things change:) When I graduated a lot of years ago light speed was stipulated as a maximum speed that could not be exceeeded, red shift and blue shifts never indicated anything was travelling faster than light speed, physicicists said there was an unbelievable edge to the universe and came up with an imagined big bang to explain all matter and the beginning of time(which I do not believe and never have). Einsteins equations have had to be adjusted to take into account new observations. Things change. Now we have galaxies doing 3 times light speed disapearing over event horizons, undetectable dark matter and an accelerating universe. Including string theory. Strings that come out of no where and make up all matter and carry all forces. The big bangers are still invoved in physics(I still dont believe them). Things change. We briefly looked at the red shift and an event horizon for things moving away from us at above light speed. When things are moving towards us at above light speed how blue shifted can they get, before they become invisible to us. Heavy elements can only be formed in super high gravitatinal fields or under immense pressure. What happens when a sun doing 3 times light speed collides with a sun going in the opposite direction relatively speaking. Is this not a more likely scenario for a humungus big bang that has most likely happened multiple times in the history of the universe. Stars in the Andromeda galaxy hitting stars in the milky way, may create some big bangs if they happen. The universe is a car crash, how could you tell the difference between different types of big bangs. E = mc2 seems a little lacking under this scenario. This is more believable to me than a bing bang from nothing, perhaps the big bangers just didnt see a galactic collision coming Any sentient thoughts on this would be appreciated. I initially asked a question under ionization of gases, something I am interested in, because I did not know how to calculate the relativistic effects, into two moving charges going in oppposite directions along wires, no one answered. I guess this little idea is a harder question to answer. Thank you all for your input.