A Tripolation

...WOW. That is amazing.

I'm still waiting for that haiku. If he comes up with one, I just may become a fan of him on Facebook.

How have you NOT seen this thread??

Maybe you just like seeing your name in his signature, Phi.

You like referring to yourself in the third person...don't you? And how much longer will this travesty of a thread be allowed to continue???

Really Mr Skeptic? He simply said that he feels there's an equal number of scumbags on both sides, and I tend to agree. Yeah, the republicans are being incredibly whiny and childish now, but so are the democrats whenever the republicans have control. I can't see how that can possibly be disputed. Both sides are made of flawed human beings. I don't think that that applies as he was simply trying to ask you the same question, to see if you had a better answer than he did...not to disprove your original argument. And then you replied with the intelligent equivalent of "I asked you first." What harm is there in answering the question, iNow?

Wait...what?

Uhhhh...you do realize that most homosexual couples that want to be married love each other...right?

It must be the semicolon iNow...he's got a little trap somewhere...clearly ydoaPs is nothing but a pile of lame.

ydoaPs, begone with your LIES. mib_awesome is an even more awesome person, as he even has awesome in his name! And I hear that his middle name is danger, because he's retro-cool like that.

Just write 42 for every answer and you'll be fine. Hey...he expects us to have his login information AND he waits until the last day. I think that chem is the least of his worries right now. His post does not bode well for his final exam grade.

I know this is "shifting the question", but I want to ask you about it. If we completely removed marriage's legality and made it for ceremonial purposes only, and EVERYONE had to get a civil union, then, going by your logic, gays would have no reason to object to churches denying them to be "married", correct? With the acknowledgement that the marriage performed by the church would hold no legal water whatsoever, of course.

That's one of the funniest things I've heard in a long time. This mib_awesome person must be tenfold as awesome as ydoaPs.

This is really it walkntune...as a theist like you, I don't support gay marriage, as I don't understand it, but I see how wrong it is for me to actively oppose it, which is why I won't vote for or against it. Why can't two (or heck, even more) consenting adults be with the person they love?

That's what they're teaching in schools nowadays? When I was there...gosh, a whole 3 years ago, they didn't even talk to us about heterosexual relationships, but now they're going to talk about how anal sex is ok? Man, where was I at when they made this curriculum change?

From what I've read, some of them STILL consider this discrimination...even if they are not religious...which confuses me a great deal.

I actually really don't think it is. I think it's acceptable in this context. And Swansont just pwned us all.

Oh...this should be fun. /me pops some popcorn and waits for the beating.

Ah, we could do this forever, and I would still win every time. Haha, Mr Skeptic forgot an apostrophe, let's all point and laugh at him.

Dammit!!!

What? Where?

You do realize that you made a typo within your correction of Zolar V's post, right? That's too good to not be intentional. And yes, my grammar is flawless and I didn't misspell a word in this post. I win.

So what qualifications does one need? A good grasp of basic calculus and classical physics? Or must I be familiar with some concepts of modern physics as well?

I tip my hat to anyone who recognizes that legos are the highest feat of engineering ever accomplished. Well done, sir.