Roger Dynamic Motion

Where there is motion, but no force, there is still momentum. There is just no change of momentum. This is true !~ but it is not the case with my post I'm talking about an object obstructing a laser light being displaced

My post is referring to ''universal time only '' and also ; referring to the law of relativity as stated by Einstein , the two frames must be in relative motion to achieve Motion ; with a machine made from man . Einstein said, there is no preferred reference frame; =law of relativity

By the way ~ I excuse my self / I'm francophone If I am allowed to post i will ! Click on ../ continuous dynamic motion 2 frames that belong to a different Axis ../ time is different . and that makes it possible to create motion.

example / If the momentum is = to X force, and ; is a force moving an object, then it must have an opposite force that is = X also and that opposite force happens to be the ''laser'' it self,,therefore the laser must be fixed stationary to give rise to the compressed wave to accumulate momentum in time .

I have made research from experimentation in mechanic and the result is !~ Every frame that belong to the same axis; time is the same.../ 2 frames that belong to a different Axis ../ time is different .

I have made research from experimentation in mechanic and the result is !~ Every systeme that belong to the same axis; time is the same.../ 2 systems that belong to a different Axis ../ time is different

In this case then ; the photons do not propagate trough space <<the particles present in the ether are the transporter ..like a chain reaction leading to the target aiming .The photons are only the agitators emitted from the source of light . error. sorry

Well ../ If one drops a ball from an helicopter standing still , and the person on earth know the time of start from the helicopter and record the time of the touch down an makes the difference in time of the duration of the fall at 32 F.. S.....square, !~ what will we learn from that experiment../ Acceleration ? perhaps../ .

Momentum is the quantity of motion, that is to say ~ the product of mass and of speed << that does generate a force .

Gravitons Scientific Forum I definitely have to believe they are a component of the Gravitational force(s) an s for more than one graviton. For matter to be moved or displaced there must be inter action meaning matter does not let itself through by the same . For every action there is a reaction.To read the weight of a body on the scale demonstrate to me, a force must includes matter in the equation. I Think the third law is valid in this case and self evident. I think logic is a term that people are lacking in physics afraid to face evidence, when affected by it constantly throughout their life, G.f._ If a PARTICLE is too small to be seen but evidence of it’s action is a fact from the reaction of the other bigger particle, than logic should not be influenced by the size of its opponent._ Gravity is gravitation from gravitons in motion and when constrained by bigger particle in their path they will be felt as a whole on that surface: Thanks for reading. Roger

Well !~ if the momentum is = to X force, and ; is a force moving an object, then it must have an opposite force that is = X also and that opposite force is the ''laser'' it self,,therefore the laser must be fixed stationary to give rise to the compressed wave .

Ok !~ then the Inertia of the laser meaning (stationary) will be what will make possible for the beam of photons to accumulate momentum in a form of compress positive wave..

So !~for a possible momentum matter must be a part of the equation ,,so photon must contains particles with it's constituent ''matter''

The driven prof, is the fact that <<the source of the laser is the one making it possible for compressing the wave and this is call matter...and by the way the force generated from the opposed source (laser) not the beam ; is inversely proportional at the impact of the beam at target.

Who would thing of a perpetual motion machine build from scratch with the use of Energy Impossible . Energy cannot be renewed from energy ,,only from a force and that force as i know it is the natural G F. plus a physical force .= Macanical operatus..

I like that subject very much ! In a way, its like i said before in an other post , that << energy can only be detected with the presence of matter,, it can maybe stated in a different way but never the less matter still a part of the answer ...and must be a part of the equation . I do believe. Who would thing of a perpetual motion machine build from scratch with the use of Energy Impossible . Energy cannot be renewed from energy ,,only from a force and that force as i know it is the natural G F. plus a physical force .

But a compressed wave is possible ! How can that be possible? without a momentum.

I met , the time is relative to the object falling in vacuum.

So !~ the mass start increasing at xo,yo ?

I agree

ok Thanks

Studiot,,, Thanks for the clarification

Energy !~ is the property that must be transferred to an object in order to perform work on the object, The SI unit of energy is the joule, which is the energy transferred to an object by the mechanical work of moving matter a distance in time . So energy cannot be demonstrated , if there is no matter in is pat acting opposed to it's constituent , witch is acting as a opposite force and that force will tell the amount of energy being used ,depending of the tip of energy ? So when I say that matter is necessary to demonstrate that energy is present to do work that statement is true or not .../ So energy in it self is not a force only a propriety .

Energy !~ is the property that must be transferred to an object in order to perform work on the object, The SI unit of energy is the joule, which is the energy transferred to an object by the mechanical work of moving matter a distance in time . So energy cannot be demonstrated , if there is no matter in is pat acting opposed to it's constituent , witch is acting as a opposite force and that force will tell the amount of energy being used ,depending of the tip of energy ? So when I say that matter is necessary to demonstrate that energy is present to do work that statement is true or not .../ So energy in it self is not a force only a propriety .