KHinfcube22

what about putting the victim, I mean passenger, in a thing of nuclear waste so they the would be radioactive? That would stop gamma wouldn't it? ( just so you don't think I'm a COMPLETE idiot, I'm only joking.)

I'm nOT oN Any kInDa oF drUgs aT thiS mOmmeNt.

What do you mean lock me up? I'm all ready in an Asylum. I swaer, it was the squirrels that chewed up the stop sign! It wasn't me!

not all monkeys are animals, the ones the goverment are working on are classified as plants. You mean all french fries are animals so all animals are french fries. (oops, shouldn't have put that gov. secret out!)

I suggested it this way though to examine the Idea of a none animate being going into a time fluctuating singularity.

like rectangles. Squares are always rectangles, but rectangles are not always squares. A philosophy for life one can always live on.

what if we found a way to keep frozen liquid nitrogen to stop melting at room temperature?

The only way to know as one's self what will happen, or what is happening, to the universe is to either ask an alien being who has lived for millieniums, or find a way to prolong life. Now the the first one will be not easy, but the seconds child's play.

I believe, (and this has nothing to do what Blike's talkin about,) that if something has never been done, there is no proof it can't be done. Wouldn't it be cool to have an infinite amount of cheese?

which means far more than one believes. "Time is the fire in which we burn" (Star Trek Generations.)

But I would still like to move stuff with my mind, kinda like John Travolta in Phenonamon, just without the death part. It might be possible, and as long as it never happens, there will be no proof it won't.

The bases of this thread was not to say numbers are pointless. It was to say everyone is rude to stereotypicalize numbers. But just because you say one can't live without numbers, I will argue exactly that one can. Now you guys need to include the chaos factor in our conversation. It is possible, no matter how unprobable, that a FUTURISTIC society can live without ever using numbers. They could just live without ever using numbers.

Making stuff up? Me? Huh? Never! ok maybe, but I didn't make it up. Any ways, a 4th spacial dimension is highly logical, it would explain many things. Like wear our socks go.

This is a science forum site. Science is practically based on statistics. Of course the chaos factor might come in here and drug use would rise, but I dought it. Most people only do drugs to break the law.

Ok then, but when I say a 4-D universe, I mean it as excluding time as a dimension. A 4 dimension spatial dimension.

according to Issac Asimov, even if one was in a spaceship they would still be vunerable to the gamma effect. and i DO know what I am talking about, (paritialy.) what would happen if someone was crogenically frozen and thrown into a blackhole?

this is annoying! What exists for one may not exist for another in the eyes of the beholder. I don't know if this has anything to do with this subject, but it still sounds cool. and thanks for the link

is that including or excluding time as a dimension?

I think it was like Einstein or some messed up guy like stephen hawking who said the whole molecule thing.

which means more fun for the rest of us.

and that proves my post. Even though drugs are illegal, the main crime is smuggling drugs, and dealing them. now if we made it legaltoget them at alocal pharmecy,or someother place, there would be no need to smugglethem in. there fore we have the same amount of people doing drugs, but no ilegal smuggling going on.

Welcome to another exciting thread about black holes! be warned, it is quite long. ____________________________________________________ Black Holes 4/17/2003 by Keith Hillaire There are many beliefs to what belief to what Black Holes, (hereby knownas BH for time's sake,) are. One is that BHs are realy Worm Holes to other parts of our Universe. This is highly unlikely, seeing how anything pulled into a BH is "smashed" into the size of the BH itself. Others say it leads you into a parallel Universe. This is most improbable for the same reason as the above. Most schools, or science programs, will tell you a BH is collapsed star. A star that, instead of going all-out supernova, was big enough to go through all the cycles until has so powerful of a gravitational pull that it emplodes. Seeing how I am no "expert" in this subject, I can't give any explanaition to why this one is improbable, (but if someone can, please tell me.) Now the realy SciFi junkies, nerds; geeks; trekies, believe that it is torn rip in the spacetime continuam! Now this version of a BH can seem logical if spoken by the right person. I propose a diffrent prespective on what a BH realy is, that is quite logical if looked at clearly. I thought this one up one day, and if anyone else came up this same idea and had it copywritten anywhere, I'm truly sorry, but I did come up with this on my own. In my earlier thread THE BIG BANG AND WHY IT WAS, I said the 3-D space of our Universe was "stacked" in a 4-D area. Now if that was true, wouldn't there still be little specks of 4-D space in our Universe, (don't realy answer the question, it's retorical.) Now imagine if we were to put a infinitely small speck of the third dimension on a plane, (for those idiots who use this sight, but have no clue what they, or us, is talking about, a plane is a 2-D surface with infinite width and length, but no depth.) Because there is no depth on a plane, and with our speck we added depth, which we would cause an extreme amount of sucktion. Thus the sucktion would seem as if it were a gravitational pull. It would not only suck in free flyin molecules, light would also get sucked in. It would be like a vacuum in a vacuum. The more it sucked in, the bigger its "Event Horizon," (which was a messed up movie by the way,) would grow to replace the space it took, (please notify me if my last statement cannot be possible, or probable.) Would it not seem to the ones of the second dimension that the only plausible explanaition to such a strong gravitational pull would have to have been the collapse of a star? I know my theory sounds far-fetched, but logical it is. It is one of the very few that explain what happens around, and what is a BH. I would like it to be noted that I learned quite a few about a BH's Event Horizon from the novel EARTH by David Brin.

boohoo, any way, if one ever did get close enough to reach a black holes event horizon, it would move at extreme speeds, and it would be constantly be hitting random molecules which would have a gamma ray like effect to the free faller, causing him to die even before he reached the EH.

Seriously though, or even if you were serious, listen anyways, I figured a way to break the barrier without goin insane. All you have to do is disolve it, then merge the two conciousnesses together to create one almighty mind.(easy, right.)

thats not what I'm talkin about. Anyway, if your sittin in a room, and you think only ten minutes has gone by, and realy 25 has, your mot likely doin something that keeps your mind busy, otherwise if you just sat and did nothin, when it seems 10 min. has gone by, 1 or 2 has actualy gone.