ivylove

This is censorship

If you do not unlock all the posts...................

Your time is up and I will answer this question tomorrow or when I get back.

Are you a robot?

The question is "is an nuclear electromagnetic field expanding?"

Real men would concede that why girls are superior. "Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount Eo/c2 " (Einstein6, § 15). "The special theory of relativity has rendered the Maxwell-Lorentz theory so plausible" "we see that the term mc2, which has hitherto attracted our attention, is nothing else than the energy possessed by the body before it absorbed the energy Eo

Massless means electromagnetic photon---inertial mass. "Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount Eo/c2 " (Einstein6, § 15). Thanks for dinner.

In Einstein's paper, "The Principle of Relativity and Its Consequences in Modern Physics" (1910), Einstein describes an electromagnetic ether. "When it was realized that a profound analogy exists between the elastic vibrations of ponderable matter and the phenomena of interference and diffraction of light, it could not be doubted that light must be considered as a vibratory state of a special kind of matter. Since, moreover, light can propagate in places devoid of ponderable matter, one was forced to assume for the propagation of light a special kind of matter that is different from ponderable matter, and that was given the name "ether." (Einstein4, § 1). "The introduction of the electromagnetic theory of light brought about a certain modification of the ether hypothesis. At first the physicists did not doubt that the electromagnetic phenomena must be reduced to the modes of motion of this medium. But as they gradually became convinced that none of the mechanical theories of ether provided a particularly impressive picture of electromagnetic phenomena, they got accustomed to considering the electric and magnetic fields as entities whose mechanical interpretation is superfluous. Thus, they have come to view theses fields in the vacuum as special states of the ether" (Einstein4, § 1). Einstein describes an electromagnetic ether but Maxwell's electromagnetic field originates from Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous. Also, Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is propagating at the velocity of light conflicts with Fresnel's diffraction mechanism that is based on interfering light waves formed by the vibration of an ether that remains stationary after the light waves propagate through the ether

Are you not avoiding the question that is being presented to you? I have clearly stated the question at hand and you seem to be reluctant in answering the said problem that I have exposed regarding physics and since this is a physics forum and not a English grammar forum I believe that typo errors are not a sufficient reason to avoid answering the question. Perhaps you should allow the numerous people with much more superior knowledge regarding physics have a chance to respond or may you could email a physics prof from MIT or Stanford, or Harvard to answer the problem.

If you have rest-mass of electron me = 9.11*10^-31 kg, after multiplying it by c^2, where c=299792458 m/s, It is energy after annihilation. But you need also positron, antimatter antiparticle of electron, with the same rest-mass as electron me. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The inertial mass is massless. An electron has a mass. e − +e + →γ+γ

Does an electromagnetic field based on Faraday's induction effect expand. Please, explain what you are assuming is "nonsense". It is the electromagnetic theory of modern physics or something else?

Is dark matter another name for the aether, ether, diametric medium, electric fluid, dark energy and elastic fluid ? Or is the dark matter something new.

Does an EM field expand? Also, girl power.

Einstein is attempting to justify Fresnel's ether composed of matter with an electromagnetic ether using the inertial mass since Einstein is justifying the existence of Fresnel's ether using the reversal of the negative result of Michelson-Morley experiment based on Lorentz's theory. "On the other hand, all coordinate systems moving relatively were to be regarded as in motion with respect to the æther. To this motion against the æther ("æther-drift") were attributed more complicated laws which were supposed to hold relative to. Strictly speaking, such an æther-drift ought also to be assumed relative to the earth, and for a long time the efforts of physicists were devoted to attempts to detect the existence of an æther-drift at the earth's surface....Although the estimated difference between these two times is exceedingly small, Michelson and Morley performed an experiment involving interference in which this difference should have been clearly detectable. But the experiment gave a negative result — a fact very perplexing to physicists. Lorentz and FitzGerald rescued the theory from this difficulty by assuming that the motion of the body relative to the æther produces a contraction of the body in the direction of motion, the amount of contraction being just sufficient to compensate for the difference in time mentioned above." (Einstein6, § 16). Einstein is using the reversal of Michelson-Morley experiment to justify the existence of Fresnel's ether (Michelson-Morley, p. 333) based on Lorentz's theory but Lorentz uses the constant magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity vector px yet at the surface of the earth, the magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity vector px , formed by the earth's daily and yearly motions, is not constant.. At 6:00 pm, the magnitude of the earth's tangential velocity px is 462 m/s (fig 11) and at 7:00 pm, the magnitude of px increases to 5,077 m/s. At midnight, the earth's tangential velocity vector px is 30,462 m/s. As time increases, the earth's tangential velocity px increases from 462 m/s to 30,462 m/s (6:00 pm - 12:00 am) which proves Einstein's special relativity is physically invalid. Girls Rock harder than boys.

"Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy Eo, then its inertial mass increases by an amount Eo/c2 (Einstein6, § 15). You were saying???. Maybe boys should consider what you are saying first before you post. Just a little suggestion.

In Einstein's paper, "The Foundation of the Generalised Theory of Relativity" (1916), Einstein represents gravity with Maxwell's electromagnetic field using Maxwell's equations. dh/dt + rot e = 0.. div h = 0... rot h - de'/dt = i.... div e' = p" (Einstein5, § 20). Einstein is representing gravity with Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is based on Faraday's induction effect but a small stone that is affected by gravity but not attracted to a magnet which is experimental proof gravity is not an electromagnetic phenomenon. Girl power definitely superior.

Einstein's (1917) energy equation E = mc^2 is used to justify the structural unification of an electron with a massless electromagnetic field but Einstein's inertial mass (m = E/c^2) is massless since E represents the energy of an em photon (Einstein, sec 15). Does this not prove that quantum electrodynamics, string theory, quantum field theory, quantum chromodynamics, plasma physics, condense matter physics, and particle physics that use the gauge transformation of Maxwell's equations is just plain incompetence in motion.

How can a nuclear proton represented with an electromagnetic field that is expanding maintain a particle structure of a nuclei as time increases. Does the nuclear electromagnetic magically not expand as time increases? What may I ask what is happening here? Some smart girls needs to do some cleaning to this sloppiness that the boys have made.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

An alpha particle is not an atom.

Atomic physics is based on the electron-proton force yet only a hydrogen atom forms a charged nuclei. All the other atoms form a neutral charged nuclei. I was just wondering while I was combing my hair.

So now can you NOW tell me how Cavendish measured a 2 microgram weight in 1797. Girl Power rules.

Using a radius of 6.771 x 10^6 m and a period of 5400 sec (1.5 hours), the centripetal force would be 458.4 N and the Newton's gravitational force is 438.4 N for a 50 kg astronaut which produces a 20 N force pointing away from the earth. Hi. My name is Ivy would you like a physics lesson?

Let say that it is approximately a constant angular velocity for a one hour time interval. Now explain the effect (weightlessness) of the astronaut propagating in the opposite direction of the angular velocity and why a person that is propelled at a velocity of five mph, from the space station, towards Uranus propagates in the direction of Uranus in a straight line since the centripetal force would prevent such an occurrence. Maybe some sort of mistake such as mistaking Jupiter for the moon? Also, in your free fall argument if it is even a argument or maybe a joke, what free fall are you speaking of? (Maybe the fall during the elliptical orbit.) since if it wasn't for the decay of the orbit and space station would remain in orbit forever and ever. Is this not irreversible and definitive proof that women are smarter than men? "Freefall is not from orbital decay. " What then? (give me some scientific facts)

"If it was the centripetal force that was causing the weightlessness of the 50 kg astronaut then the angular velocity would be constant" is a correction to the post----> Posted Tuesday at 05:18 PM (edited) · Report post Also, respectfully,was the free fall argument a motion to concede the centripetal force argument?