Oxidizer

Either Philosophical or abstract time is something that is needed to make several things like: calculations, experiments.. and more social things like apointments between people, travelling from somewhere to somewhere else, or any other thing that any of us can think about, so as nowadays time is needed for almost everything is not possible, from my point of view to say that time does not exists. Explain what is it is different but it really exists.

The last sentence of my post was ironic, of course I've read post#2, because of that reason I've put that icon ( ). It was Just an irony.

During all this year I've been working with H2O2 in research of his oxidation power and countless times I've been told to be really carefull with this stuff, the one I'm using is 30%w/v, about 8.8Molar, and seems to be really really expensive. If someone knows a non-expensive way to producing it just tell me .

The Einstein's theory that I've mentioned before was based on the availabilty to reach the light speed, but is aplicable to any velocity. It means that when you move at any velocity the time affects you in a different way. The thing is that to notice this change either you run really fast (as the man in the topic above) or you run during endless time at low speed (as the marathon man). So is not necessary to reach the light speed.

Is possible to say that time exists since you are able to change it, or at least since you are able to modificate in some way the way it affects yourself. I explain: As Einstein said: "If someone could run at the ligth speed, the time would pass more slowly to him than to someone who has been quiet during the same period". So as time is something tha can be altered, it does exist.

Time is the magnitude needed to make the rest of the magnitudes real.

It's O2.

Thanks again!. So, the reason you think is the most provable is due to a contamination of the sample during the experiments. The thing is that I've repeat the experiments so many times with HCl at high concentrations, always generating bubbles, to be sure that is not due to contamination. And as I'm concerned that is not due to the H2O2 concentration I thought it had to be due to some reaction between the acid and the peroxide in water which should involve the breakdown of H2O2 maybe by an increment in Temperature or something similar. I will appreciate any other suggestion or explanation.

Thinking about your answer, when doing my experiments, HCl with H2O2, both at high concentrations, in dest. water, by diluting the concentration of the H2O2 the bubbles still appeared and it was till I'd diluted the HCl below 1Molar that the bubbles stopped appearing.

Mmmm. Interesting, if these was the reason, when changing the strong acid HCl by H2SO4 or HNO3 the bubbles should also appear on not?. In my experiments there are no bubbles when these other acids are used, is this compatible with your answer?. Thank you so very much.

Hello I've been reading part of this topic and some of you have been talking about HCl and H2O2, and I've got a question about them: During these days I'm going through some experiments of oxidations of sulfides in different solutions composed by a strong acid and H2O2. Preparing some samples I realized that when I mix HCl at high concentrations (from 1Molar to 12Molar) with H2O2 also at high concentrations (from 0.5Molar to 9Molar) in destilated H2O, after few seconds it start appearing bubbles in the solutions. Do someone know why is this due to? if yes, could you post the reason. At HCl contations about 6 and above, I thought it colud be due to the heat generated by the mixture with H2O, that made the H2O2 begin to decompose and then the liberation of oxygen was observed by bubbling. But at low concentrations this doesn't make sense. I really wait for your answers. Thanks a lot!.