Baron d'Holbach

I leave that to you. I hope I do not need to wait until 2100 for the breakthroughs with your models.

A big deal to me, as I am not from academia. I am literally from the jungles with two machetes. So, yes, it means everything. Like I mention before, me and you and everyone here have an expiry date. Humans must continue onwards before the inevitable happens to us.

Its okay, At least it is out. Its mine and its here, its for everyone to extract ideas, concepts, philosophy and a vision.

Oh I am not, I just like Prime Mechanics alot, btw, I told you PM can scale, I am taking notes. All you are is just making PM even stronger. Nothings has been disproven but expanding in my model.

Ha, Thanks The field will be represented as a physical system (dimension), and the system will be based on vector space, calculated with matrix math, built, measured, and mapped with geometric, symmetrical shapes, with tensors and subsections establishing curvature manifold fields. The operation operates in a trajectory wave with an equation from Prime Laws at each dimension. Mapping this field (Prime Field) will be placed inside a scalar field, a vector field that can be mapped and measured at each point of a region with added tensor operations and motion activation, such as spinor for a generated with long Compton wavelengths, to create energy. J^μ = -F^μν * D_νΛ The equation is a long chain, explaining a step continuation. That includes: Yang-Mills Noether’s theorem Gauge Fields Hilbert space Hamiltonian/Lagrangian QCD

No one is forcing you to adopt my model. You have your 1960s to 2023 models. I’ll wait until 2100 for the next breakthrough with those models. All those ideas I master and yawn. It is 2023, I do not see a breakthrough with those archaic, not forward models, ideas, and concepts. All right, Baron, go make your own, right? Correct, I reinvented Physics. Created my own model. Design my own path and self-discover Everything beyond the military-industrial complex useless particle accelerators that has stalemated itself into oblivion. Question to be... "If you do not like our military-industrial complex machines, what is better? " Gravity Machine. All your questions and others are the same 1960s ideas, concepts, and questions. “What is 10-43, what is 10-43, what is the damn 10-43?” The same old 1960s; those are the wrong questions and ideas. Let us repeat 1: Newton’s Gravity is Earth-Based Einstein’s Gravity is Cosmos Based Delamotte’s Gravity is Origin Based Let us repeat 2: Newton explains the objects, Einstein explains the curvature, and Delamotte explains the origin within Gravity itself as Gravity is a open and closed system. That can be open within itself. Gravity can generate and create toward the equilibrium point within itself, at the center of itself. Let us repeat 3: Newton’s Gravity is an object-based Gravity Einstein Gravity is a Cosmos, grand scale based Delamotte’s Gravity has internals and externals that acts as an open and closed system. Open to the ground state, the vacuum state, can be extracted for Potential Energy. WHAT? Let us repeat 4: Gravity can be sliced like an atom, open to the ground state, where Dark Matter can be extracted and manipulated, and harvested for potential Energy. Gravity is a closed state that Einstein, and Newton’s Gravity takes center stage. WHAT!? Let us repeat 5: Gravity is an open and closed system that is internal and external. On the outside, aka closed system, it is Einsteins’ laws, and in this, at an object level, is Newton’s laws. WHAT!? Let us repeat 6: Gravity is a internal and external system. Gravity is a two-system phenomenal. I call it "Elemental Gravity" Let us repeat 7: Gravity Closed system has Newton and Einstein’s ideas. Gravity Open System has internals that generates the vacuum state, where Dark Matter is created and generated between 0 and 1. At the center at ½, in where Dark Energy is produced as 1. WHAT!? I repeat Gravity’s closed system is a like a compressization system (Curvature) that generate inside Gravity’s Open system to generate Dark Matter. Let us repeat 8: Gravity is based on Zeta ½, we can create a system that using prime numbers for pin-pointing mass distribution. This leads to the densification towards ½, where a rarefication happens, and the physical universe aka Big Bang, starts and expands from a negative and positive interaction. WHAT!? Let us repeat 9: I am not explaining the 1960s stalemate ideas. I am creating the machine that will generate and create Aether. WHAT!? Let us repeat 10: Lastly, Prime Field is the Model. The tools are zeta ½, and all Prime Mechanics ideas are used to create the Field, and pin-point all the matter and generate a rarefication at the center ½ and create Aether. Afterward, Gravity closes, and Einstein and Netwons ideas take center stage, leading to Darwin’s evolution. That is the Theory of Everything. —Prime Mechanics Page 88-89 "I am not explaining your 1960s models. I never intended."

I'm going to sleep its 230am here. You too much lol! I want that Supersymmetry Chirality math discoveries from you on your thread. Prime Mechanics pg. 76

Not even close. its done and complete. I answered everything that needs to be answer. If I missed anything, that's all nit-picking and irrelevant. My main job was to create the big bang from gravity and its done. S = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g'^μν ∂_μ φ ∂_ν φ - V(φ) + Λ(g') θ(z)θ(1-z) - 1/2κ^2(R' + m^2(z)h') θ(z)θ(1-z) + L_m' θ(z)θ(1-z)] Here, the step function θ(z)θ(1-z) ensures that all terms in the equation are active within the range 0 ≤ z ≤ 1, while outside this range, the terms effectively become zero. Breakdown: Integral notation: The expression starts with the integral symbol "∫," which represents integration over space. The term "d^11x" represents the differential volume element in 11-dimensional spacetime. Square root of the determinant of the metric: The expression continues with "√|g|," where "g" represents the metric tensor and "|" denotes the determinant. Taking the square root of the determinant is a mathematical operation commonly used in the theory of general relativity. Kinetic term: The next term is "(1/2) g'^μν ∂_μ φ ∂_ν φ," which represents the kinetic energy of a scalar field φ. Here, "g'^μν" represents the inverse of the metric tensor, and "∂_μ φ" denotes the partial derivative of φ with respect to the μth coordinate. Potential term: The expression includes "- V(φ)," which represents the potential energy of the scalar field φ. The specific form of the potential function V(φ) is not provided. Λ(g') term: The term "Λ(g') θ(z)θ(1-z)" introduces a coupling between the scalar field φ and a cosmological constant Λ. The function θ(z) is the Heaviside step function, taking the value 1 for positive arguments and 0 otherwise. This term is multiplied by θ(z)θ(1-z), which restricts its contribution to a specific region in the z-coordinate. The Heaviside step function θ(z)θ(1-z) ensures that this term is only active within the range 0 ≤ z ≤ 1. Curvature term: The expression includes "- 1/2κ^2(R' + m^2(z)h') θ(z)θ(1-z)," which represents a curvature term. Here, "R'" represents the Ricci scalar curvature of the metric, and "h'" is a tensor related to the metric perturbation. The factor "m^2(z)" introduces a mass term that depends on the coordinate z. Similar to the previous term, this term is also multiplied by θ(z)θ(1-z) to restrict its contribution. This term involves the curvature of spacetime. It includes the Ricci scalar curvature (R') of the metric tensor and a tensor (h') related to metric perturbations. The term also incorporates a mass term (m^2(z)) that depends on the coordinate z. Matter Lagrangian term: The final term is "L_m' θ(z)θ(1-z)," representing the Lagrangian density of matter fields, denoted as L_m'. Similar to the previous terms, this term is also multiplied by θ(z)θ(1-z) to restrict its contribution. It describes the dynamics of the matter content in the theory. The integral is performed over 11-dimensional spacetime, denoted by the coordinates "x." The notation "d^11x" represents the differential volume element in this 11-dimensional spacetime, which is a generalization of the usual 3-dimensional space. The integral symbol "∫" indicates the integration over all possible values of the coordinates. The coordinates "x" represent the points in the 11-dimensional spacetime over which the integration is performed. The determinant of the metric tensor, denoted as "|g|," provides a scalar quantity that characterizes the scaling of the coordinate system, and taking its square root, as denoted by "√|g|," ensures the action functional is coordinate-invariant. Overall, the action functional represents the total energy associated with the field theory, considering the kinetic and potential energy of the scalar field, contributions from the cosmological constant and curvature, and the dynamics of matter fields. The step function ensures that certain terms are only active within a specific range of the z-coordinate.

Yes, I have the impossibility job. Technically the hardest science question of all time. No other one can trump this. I am still finishing off your previous question at 2am. better to rewrite it again tomorrow or sloppy input it here now... Lets see.

with a approximation. But on Earth based it is next to 100% correct.

? Newtonian gravity, is an Earth-based theory. It describes the gravitational interactions between objects on a relatively small scale, such as the motion of planets, moons, and objects on Earth. Newton gravity does not provide cosmological phenomena's, on a very large scale os the cosmos. Only Object based. its technically an object based theory aka Earth based. Now hold on I was trying to write the answer to your other questions. No wonder why I missed your questions. You literally asking a thousand at a time LOL! I might sleep and wait until tomorrow now.

What the heck? Your statement is incorrect. Again another one I caught you on... Hey man... You will convince others you are the gospel truth person but I am catching you!! LOL! Newton's shell theorem does not contradict the concept of gravity or falsify the principle of General Correspondence. And the shell theorem describes the gravitational field inside and outside a spherically symmetric mass distribution. I am not talking about that... Newtons gravity is earth based, Einstein's gravity is cosmos based, and Delamotte's gravity is the the origin of origins. Prime Mechanics is 100% Newton and Einstein's Gravity. It is the Full and Final description of gravity. Aether is irrelevant, no need to bring this here. I reuse Newtons Aether and transform his version to the cosmological constant aka Prime Energy aka Dark Energy. It is not what you think, of course because you not aware of prime mechanics work still.

Of course! I am literally challenging existing paradigms. I am developing new theoretical frameworks, and exploring novel experimental techniques. We have gatekeepers in the science world if you haven't noticed. Saying the say old stuff and the same old ideas and using the same old models.

I think you missed the whole point, the zoo of particles is archaic and old school. Sure, do more testable predictions on the zoo of particles with no real advancements until the year 2100. It is time to reinvent physics.

Why are you looking into this? It technically do not exist? Or you just want a philosophical footing?