Syphill

And a rapist, can just as easily masturbate. Yet rapes! you.....wonderful being.

Callypgious: C'mon. Now tell me about all your schooling and relationships and books that you've read and your brialliant abilities to add 2 plus 2. Becuse this distingushes you from the "animals", my genius. That, and believeing in Jesus and virtue and wuv. Right? The point is your brain is not reading words. Your emotions are reading your dislike of me, you logical mess. That's so amazingly sicneitific. In a scienceforum. SCIENCE SCIIENCE science. And yours- one) that you cannot bloody read: "This by no means implies that the male only wants to have children or spread seed. To him, its a "power process" or some abstract ego-soothing smarm about 'domination'. Yet I, and you, and we, should always remember who's boss and, thus, driving things. Nature.", Syhill two) take it oh so personal as I know all a Lancelot is capable of three) your inabilty to see that to Gaia, you don't matter And I'm the arrogant one *grin* Now do you a favor and take up your 'rape is about power and not sex" tripe with the manicured social scientists in my basement. If it weren't about sex, dear, there'd be, like, you know, no erection?

And don't bring up the ugly-but-nice-so-gets-laid David Schimmers. Far too rare.

We meet again! Greetings to you all established intellectuals, so kind and loving and brilliant. Its is Syphill.. So! Can't a girl stand back to observe your fecundity, wondering what will happen to this thread if she left- why so quiet? So demure? Until Nexus resumed on his own? No salient thoughts on this most pressing topic of broomstick-with-blade-up-a-girl's-yam? Not even the casual reference to Masters and Johnson to display your abilities of casual referencing? You know, like the chick in the other thread trying to teach me about Kohlberg in name-only? *funeral ring* No love sessions with Klanger? Vagina was not enough. A utensil jammed up a vagina was not enough, even considering the compulsive obsession with sex that the Modern is heir to. A poor weakling bewailing her getting violated by another poor weakling was not enough No, no, in order too shoot up the number of views and posts in this sagging thread where the self-professed libertines come to bask like so many artists in French galleries and cuisines the answer is as timeless as its been for the Christian. You must give it an outlet to feed its aggression- not the honest aggression of the criminal, the brute, the b-itch or the carniverore- but the contorted one of the hypocrite who bares his fangs under excuse of "Cuase". Not only bare them, but sit there and watch all his comrades take up this Grand Cause that's forgotten its premise because, as always, its become voyeurism. Do any of you even know Klangy? *grin* Didn't think so. Yet all of you pour your love out to complete strangers, forfeiting all its value. On topic: Rape is social biology, not philosophy or science.. The social scientists believes that men learn to rape and are summarily put through programs and seminars trying to 'teach' it back out of them. The social scientist, like all of you and my little friend Klanger, believes that a girl can be just as educated in her demeanor and by modification can just as such deterr rape. Because in a civilized society, so they say, it all adds up to Respect. I can understand Invert’s point- a confident woman can be seen as intimidating an too, as a prize where confidence can be its own worst enemy by calling attention to itself. However, rape is not a human dilemma. You'll find it in birds, frogs, dogs, lizards, nonhuman primates as well- consider the scorpionfly. The male has something on its abdomen called a nodal organ which it uses to latch on to the female. It has two options when mating- either court her with goods or impose itself on her body. This nodal organ has no function sexually other than to grab on to her to force his penis into her body. Nature places no other demand on its organisms, which all of you are, as important otherr than to procreate. That pull is stronger than reason and any stalwart philosophy a social scientist can muster. It does not care for your feelings of justice, nobility, your pompous 'rights' and your precious person- hood. Its does not care if you were weak once with your head down like a ninny or held high like mine is. I can be raped. So can Klanger. The male is, by nature, instilled with a sexual impulse stronger than that of the females (duh) as the investment in offspring for both is indirectly proportional- she expends alot of energy just to breed once and he expends no energy at all just to keep breeding indiscriminately. Which makes her chooosy and drives him insane just to be chosen. So he has three options. Be physically appealing to her by displaying symmetry thus health. If not, like Woody Allen (ick), he compensates with social status and finance. For the man that is neither physically appealing nor wealthy, his only recourse is rape. This is why rape is crime of poverty and deviance and its perpetrator socially unskilled personally or otherwise and, quite frankly, butt ugly. This is why rape victims are usually women in their fertile years. Don't point out to me the occasions every now and then where an old woman got raped or her mother or them both, or pedophilia, or where the rapist is a successful bachelor, handsome, or a married mlae with three kids. These instances, statistically, are GROSSLY underrepresented in comparison to the rest. Man is a lusty moron driven by groin (ha) and just the fact that every now and then his call to procreate gets f-ucked and unleashes itself on the elderly and the young, and when in prison manifests itself in rampant, careless, violent homosexuality (whereas in female prisons, its more nurturing and communicative as a testament to lonelieness) – this only proves that these wired imbeciles we call Men truly are, to use Soalnanas’s words (and she ruled) "walking dildos" - Solanas. (muhahah) This by no means implies that the male only wants to have children or spread seed. To him, its a "power process" or some abstract ego-soothing smarm about 'domination'. Yet I, and you, and we, should always remember who's boss and, thus, driving things. Nature. Conclusion: So, for Klangawassername to think she will stand a chance of not being raped again because she is "confidnet" now is to think like a social scientist who does nothing but watch Oprah, write books, psychoanalyze, go to school, and watch Oprah. Both of you only guarantee your being raped again. Nature does not care to respect you.

Gorgeous fiend. *chuckle* And have you seen them on the Who's Online? Fascinating. We are the music makers..and we are the dreamers of the dream- Herr Wonka. Let's roll... Do you honestly think so? The pull to steal being nowhere near as strong as the pull of one’s violent sexuality and the need to impose it on another- add to this that rape is most common between 'friends' or occurring at night when the person is alone- what good is confidence then? That's like thinking one can stop a bull elephant's musth with philosophy. No? A friend knows you personally and that is a vulnerability no matter how confident. And at night and alone is…. just asking for it, head held high or not. You are prey. Calypigous: Eat me.

God, you're all a bunch of WOMEN. Are you not "scientists"? Or at least exited by science, as you claim? Wassamatta? Don’t like me ‘cause I’m icky? Push your Pier 1 imported chairs to the screen and read: Science requires scrutiny. Scrutiny requires analysis. Analysis requires data. Which in the end should be the OBJECTIVE. ALL impossible if one cannot slow down, put the emotions on hold, and do something as simple as READ. I said: "'twas a trap. Lighten up. " That comment, my intellectual little friends, was a trap just to prove what would happen. And.it.bloody.did. Thread is right damn near bottom until something stirs up and presto you sit back to watch all these plasticine heroes not only come to the rescue but sit there and watch. Such is the noble biped posturing with its Reason. Know what knights were? Moral rogues. They'd protect a maid's virute tooth and nail but crucify a harlot. Like all you modern nobles who claim an open mind and relativity until one hits up on a soft spot. Or rub them the “wrong way “, you know like picking on a weakling or calling Jesus something as stupid as feeding third world countries. Difference between you and I is I don't claim it. Here's the smartest god in this manicured Olympus: Callypigous: Quit smearing concepts, you imbecile. You are OFFENDED that I picked on what's-her- name. So much so you can't climb off your little moral highground to READ it was a trap.....set just for those like you. Tatum. And to cow to your stupidity, I’ll even help you through it: "no you moron... whos offended at a traffic accident? maybe disturbed, not offended"- ca You are all like church ladies gaping at an accident. You are all transfixed. But claim to be offended.. I used a thing us literateurs coined Metaphor, my brilliant one. Then why not just..................shut up? My left nipple when its chilly. If that means I love me at your expence, I'm your Arrogancia. No, Simplicio. Real. Not heartless, that's your word. Speaking of reading books and posturing- "One knows the kind of human being who has fallen in love with the motto, “To understand is to forgive all.” It is the weak, it is above all the disappointed: if there is something to be forgiven in all, perhaps there is also something to be despised in all. It is the philosophy of disappointment that wraps itself so humanely in pity and looks sweet"- the Freddy Perhaps this is why females are so nice. Society has disappointed them.

Obnoxious: Dude- a million Dr. Flaming Phil sermons will not stop a hormonal, insecure brute from his power fetish. He wants it. If you want to stop a human from doing anything, make him not want it. Blasbah! If sanest = bloody predictable in thy dictionary.... Callypygous: Suffer.... No, Einstein. The point is that all you sacharine fluff bunnies, you know- the nice and polite- claim the being offended at my rudeness. Yet you are only giving stature to your ruddy animalism by the claiming being offended. Look at how you swarmed to denoucnce me. Look at how the church ladies gape at traffic accidents- transfixed but ..but..no, theyr'e offended. Look at how the civil swarmed to the gullotine and scaffolds some yesterwhen. Oh, but you're only protecting little Klanga-what's-her-name. Right? Encore: I RULE.

Azure: You're so female. Meet a real one. Muah. Pause. Here is what I see. Gorgeous Victorians - counts, and barons, marquises, countessas, queens, kings and princes- decked out in chiffon. Fanning themselves and the fleas, mange, and filth on their bodies( as we know from history these people did not bathe).... all insulted. "Well, I never!" *funeral grin* A piece of work is man. I RULE.

Callypgous: Are you doing this on purpose? Can you not read? Read 3 posts up, oh seeker of enlightenment. Then read the rest. There is nothing here keeping you from doing it but emotions.

Azurephoenix: And that would be what, dear? So you too will make it personal? Or you're waxing Lancelot? *funeral grin* Read my post. Then we can aim for objectivity. Does rape have anything to do with personality? That's incurring respect as being an issue, when it isn't.

Lance: Ever watched ants? For that matter been to the zoo and observed the "lower animals"? See, such is the hilarity of our species. Here we have an animal that smokes on its pipe, goes to church, claims virtue, civility and Jesus, claims to love all to the best of his energies and, with Reason, values nothing more than enlightment. Ain't that right? And it cringes at violence, goes brrrrrr. Yet these are the same that hold up traffic by stopping to gape at an accident and love Shwarsnegger getting cut up on TV. And forum for forum, I have yet to see an instance where people swarm to the logical and precise and englithgened threads and NOT those strirring up controversy with a flame ..... or a threat of one. Like this one. Such is the animal that goes to the zoo. The noble, politically correct biped. 'twas a trap. Lighten up. Lance: How so?

Flareon: Far too personal. Try some objectivity. Do you or do you not agree that rape has nothing to do with personality? That is my platform.

What's being pretty cure? The best I could cull in doing your homework: http://www.psy.plym.ac.uk/year3/psy337DepressionTheory/PSY337DepressionTheory.htm The Syphill's advice: Combine proteins and carb for an alarmed yet relaxed state- this is by far the best mood advice. Never eat a carb with no protein or a protein with no carb. For something stronger- stuff hole with chocolate. For soemthing Herceulean- engorge thyself with its Mexican version: Mole, and flush it down with coffee suffocated with white sugar. Mole has over a hundred or so different ingredients in it, much of them stimulnts made from the cocoa bean.

C'mon. Be honest. Who isn't dying to hear that Klanger- she of the Ann Coulter stupidity- got raped again because she thought confidence deters rape?

John: There was an aboriginal God who empowered her vagina with dentata- because he was a confused imbecile. Women rule. Klanger: Pardon, but you think your nose in the air deters rape? So you think rape a personality contest? Walk through my old neighborhood all confident having embraced your inner child and see what a lowly, stupid, stupid male plagued by insecruity will do to all that person-hood. Young or old. Poor or wealthy. Ugly/gorgeous.. Sterile, fecund, pregnant…. Submissive or all decoreated with the pompous air of confidence They *all* are objects to one seeking to objectify them. Which is rape.