Vmedvil

[math]+ \sqrt{(\frac{(\frac{S^{2}}{\frac{3G\frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}{2C^{2}R_{s}^{3}}}R_{p}v_{p}\frac{GI_{s}}{C^{2}}R_{s}^{3}(\frac{3R_{p}}{R_{s}^{2}}(\omega_{p}R_{p})- \omega_{p}))^{2}R_{s}^{2}}{2})\frac{Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}})}{\frac{\hbar^{2}(Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}))}{2\frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}}}[/math]

I can read it fine, but I always type them like that [math]\psibar[/math] How do i type the damned BAR [math]\nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_s,\omega_p,E,I,k_s,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu)= \hbar \omega_s Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}\omega_s \sqrt{\frac {G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{g_{uv}}}[/math]

[math] MUHA[/math] [math] \psi-bar [/math] [math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_s [/math]

Ya that papers says "which a bound of m ≤ 10-38 grams emerges".

Something like that dubblesiox extremely low. Photon bounds

I think these two terms may cancel but I cannot tell, I will have to latex this now. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħGC2))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) Ya, I official hate this forums latex for instantly not accepting it in other sizes. Ya, no it is not getting latexed here.

Okay, it looks better now.

Once, again how could they have electroweak interaction without a charge.

Well, but it has Electroweak interaction thus it must have some charge in the Sterile Neutrino model, where WIMPs do not, if it were the Sterile Neutrino case then photons would interact.

But Sterile Neutrinos are charged, WIMPs are not necessarily. The main theoretical characteristics of a WIMP are: Interactions only through the weak nuclear force and gravity, or possibly other interactions with cross-sections no higher than the weak scale. Large mass compared to standard particles (WIMPs with sub-GeV masses may be considered to be light dark matter). What I am saying is that last concept is false "or possibly other interactions with cross-sections no higher than the weak scale." and interacts with SNF.

Yes, see I used to think it could be Sterile Neutrinos too but WIMPs just make more physical sense, how does WNF charge things.....? It has never acted like that ever in normal matter unless bound with a charge like in W+ and W- , when why doesn't DM have effect by photons if that is true, but see when those split it becomes an electron or positron with a neutrino which is neutral, which says the WNF cannot be charged for long without decay along with after that split itself does not charge things. In Electroweak state, yes it can charge but after the decouple of EM and Weak, Weak cannot. W+ and W- are Electroweak, Neutrinos are just weak as the EM splits off into that electron or positron, but the Electroweak is horribly unstable itself. What is a force that we know is very stable with a ton of energy dumped into it the SNF which makes SNF+WNF a better physical coupling answer for DM.

Missed one ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħGC2))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Mb2C4) / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) Which I almost want to take all those Mb reverse solved E = MC2 as Erest which I think I will (Erest/C2) = Mb ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħGC2))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - (Erest/C2)2C4) / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) Mordred in your equation what was 1/e((E - μ)/T)±1 what was E defining there. Figured it out ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħGC2))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - (Erest/C2)2C4) / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) ∑∇'/Δt = ∇'1/Δt1 + ∇'2/Δt2 + ∇'3/Δt3 + ... + ∇'n/Δtn ∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt) Energy of Graviton Wave Es = ħωs Energy of Gravitational Wave Ep = ħωp Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius. ∑Is = (Erest/C2)1R12 + (Erest/C2)2R22 + (Erest/C2)3R32 + ... + (Erest/C2)nRn2 Einstein Tensor to Angular velocity of rotation. ωs = -1/(Is(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (Erest/C2)(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2) Cancel ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħGC2))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3G(Erest/C2)/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) ∑∇'/Δt = ∇'1/Δt1 + ∇'2/Δt2 + ∇'3/Δt3 + ... + ∇'n/Δtn ∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt) Energy of Graviton Wave Es = ħωs Energy of Gravitational Wave Ep = ħωp Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius. ∑Is = (Erest/C2)1R12 + (Erest/C2)2R22 + (Erest/C2)3R32 + ... + (Erest/C2)nRn2 Einstein Tensor to Angular velocity of rotation. ωs = -1/(Is(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (Erest/C2)(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2)

No Rest Mass, but has Relativistic mass as it has momentum.

Well, my Equation is just four current SR, so that is easy if C-C = 0, and if all the others passed then this one does as substitution was just used. Where this is about to go through another Transform because of Swan's misunderstanding of momentum, plus it removes it from the equation. Transform E2 = M2C4 + p2C2 Reverse solve for p2 = (E2 - M2C4 / C2) ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Mb2C4) / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2/ε0 μ0)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(1/ε0 μ0)))1/2) ∑∇'/Δt = ∇'1/Δt1 + ∇'2/Δt2 + ∇'3/Δt3 + ... + ∇'n/Δtn ∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt) Energy of Graviton Wave Es = ħωs Energy of Gravitational Wave Ep = ħωp Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius. ∑Is = M1R12 + M2R22 + M3R32 + ... + MnRn2 Now does C2 are getting put back in Detransform. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/C2Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħGC2))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2C4Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Mb2C4) / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) ∑∇'/Δt = ∇'1/Δt1 + ∇'2/Δt2 + ∇'3/Δt3 + ... + ∇'n/Δtn ∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt) Energy of Graviton Wave Es = ħωs Energy of Gravitational Wave Ep = ħωp Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius. ∑Is = M1R12 + M2R22 + M3R32 + ... + MnRn2

So, it would go like this Red connected to Anti-red connected to Red connected to anti-red and so on, Then would cycle between Red, Blue, and Green at the same time its partner WIMP Anti Red, Anti Blue, and Anti Green as neutral Pionlike particles made of Flavoured WIMPs bound by fundamental SNF. So this would also place DM as generated by Z0 bosons, which would bind like mesons. Neutral Pion in Normal matter, which DM would bind like Neutral Pion form and not triplet.

I know they are not Generations (Matter versus Antimatter) which is symmetry across the SNF I and Charge. But Antimatter does have Generations of matter just like normal matter but with Anti-colors and opposite charges, going generation (I,II,III)(Normal,Mu,Tau) What I was pointing out is that there is a missing Symmetry mirror across flavour, which the others seem to have, it is non baryonic so it would have no residual SNF, but would will have the fundamental SNF if it exists as chargeless quarks, which it has no interaction with photons so it may very well be that. Don't you think there are 3 levels of DM as (Hot,Warm,Cold) being the same levels as (Normal,Mu,Tau). Higher Rest mass goes this way ------>. <-------- Higher Velocity goes that way. Something is binding it or it wouldn't be in this shape, gravity is not strong enough to do that shape then Charge is missing because of lack of interaction with photons so that just leaves the fundamental SNF since it is non-baryonic and it seems the less velocity they have the more connected DM is it seems they are resisting something with velocity/Kinetic Energy/Momentum otherwise they would all look exactly the same in large scale shape. (Hot,Warm,Cold) So, they would be WIMPs, Cold Dark Matter being the Tau State, but WIMPS must be able to bind via Fundamental SNF, otherwise why are there those Line Groupings, which would be (WNF,SNF I, and Gravity) , but not (Charge or SNF II) WIMP Wiki

Proof of Wavelike Gravity Wavelike Behavior Gravity Witnessed Proof of Relativistic Mass and Gravitational attraction of it along with vibration of Gravitational waves, wavelike Two BH Collision Proof of Planck Scale measurements being smallest along with Planck's constant. Measurement of Planck's Constant In any case, that is 30 experimental proofs of this model being accurate to "Real" Universe. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp vp)+GIs/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp vp)+G(Is)/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + ((Ar(X) + (Ebx ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2/ε0 μ0)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(1/ε0 μ0)))1/2) ∑∇'/Δt = ∇'1/Δt1 + ∇'2/Δt2 + ∇'3/Δt3 + ... + ∇'n/Δtn ∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt) Energy of Graviton Wave Es = ħωs Energy of Gravitational Wave Ep = ħωp Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius. ∑Is = M1R12 + M2R22 + M3R32 + ... + MnRn2

Until this moment this has been a hypothesis, Now Theory it goes because of Evidence, because of how the scientific method works. Proof that as mass of the BH grows spin increases. BH Spin Near Speed of Light C- C = 0 Proof that GR is correct for Warping of Static Space-time. Einstein's Tensor Confirmed by light bending. Proof that SR is correct for Non-Static Warping of Moving Object's Time and Space. Atomic Clock Measures Time Dilation. Proof the QM is correct for Static Particles with spins. Three Experiments that Show Quantum Mechanics is Real Proof that Schwarzchild Metric is correct for Static BH, Radius. Radius of BH Measured Proof that Kerr Metric for Spinning BH is correct. Black-hole Spin Measured Proof of Quantum field theory or Standard model with Higgs is correct. Higgs Boson Found String Theory Proof with Multiple Universes Cosmic CMB Change Cold Spot Proof of uncertainty principle with causality connections upon spin. Information Transfer Synced spin states "Wormhole Proof" Proof of Strong Interaction in all matter fields. Binding Energy of SNF in anti-matter measured Proof of Gravitational Precession from stellar masses. Earth's Precession Proof that Dark matter exists. Dark Matter's Gravity found Proof of Dark Energy and Hubble's Constant being correct. Expanding Universe Proof Proof of Neutrino's existence Neutrinos Measured Proof of Higher Order Particles existence along with decay of those. Muon Lifetime measured Proof of electromagnetism Electromagnetic Transmission Tesla Coil Proof of Gravitation waves from orbiting masses. Gravitational Waves Discovered/measured Graviton existence proof with non zero mass. Graviton found Proof of Matter and Antimatter Annihilation into photons. Annihilation experiment Proof that matter can escape a BH at large sizes "relativistic Jet" Active Galaxy SMBH Proof of Wavelike Bosons Photon Double slit Experiment Proof of Tachyonic Movement beyond C under certain conditions, Open D-brane proof. Speed of QE 10,000x light measurement. Proof of Matter ionization during Black hole digestion. Infrared Echoes Proof that Consumed matter has SNF broken along photons can escape BH. X-ray Beam BH Proof of BH Magnetic Field, Proof of internal spinning charges. BH Magnetic Field found

It didn't come from nothing, it came from another dying universe the energy, The moment energy entered this universe time started before that the universe was void of Energy, thus no time as nothing ever changed, how does one measure time in a void? For instance measure time in this picture can you? (Void Main) Now this one, measure time. (Void Main DO Print"_" Clear Screen LOOP) What is the difference?

The Strings Vibrate into subspace, subspace is just a set of sub dimensions within every point of the universe, it can be visualized like this on time-space, which is the large dimensional fabric of space, I would go deeply into manifolds here but you wouldn't understand it, but if you do want to understand it look into Riemann Manifolds, which the strings are basically the Metric Tensor for in M-Theory or Unified String Theory which is a Calabi–Yau manifold , like the Energy Stress Tensor in General Relativity pushes into a hyper domain, This Tensor pushes into a sub domain. Sub Domain (String Theory) "Bend Inward" Hyper Domain (General Relativity) "Bend outward" To Answer your question there is no difference between the two states you stated, they are both the same-thing they cannot be split apart like you are thinking, and don't use the term quantum fluctuations that is something completely different, this is "String Harmonics"

The Three generations(I,II,III) are caused from change in Flavour of the particles each being more Rest massive then the last in that direction, but being identical in every other property to their lesser cousins. These Particles higher level particles are also much more unstable then their lesser cousins having a very short half-life before decay into lesser particles. Disclaimer: This has nothing to do with Taste, Vmedvil is not responsible for death via tasting higher level states of flavour in particles.

Honestly, Here is what I think Dark Matter is, as I have said many times. It is The Flavor Mirror (Symmetry) of the Strong Nuclear Force that does not require a charge to make a stable matter system unlike normal matter which requires a charge of some sort being like how Anti-matter particles have the opposite charge, well these have the opposite flavor which does not require a Charge to be stable. All of the other Forces besides this one have a symmetry besides flavour, so removing all the other possibilities it must be across that. Generation -I = Cold Dark Matter, Generation -II = Warm Dark Matter, Generation -III = Hot Dark matter. Flavour wiki Here is this in Charged matter Charged Matter vs Non Charged Dark Matter

Lie Groups S = 3 S = 7 S= 20

Lunapic after calculating the number of magnitude from the equation to do it as, like preccession and rotation were 1, while SNF = 30, EM = 1, and WNF .7 while gravity is some screw up low number, while Pixelation and ripple are 1, I couldn't do 1/2 for both of them wouldn't let me same with precession and rotation, but ωs - ωp = 0 ,ωs + ωp = 2 along with Wave - Particle = 0 , Wave + Particle = 2 and k = 553 , which means there is a very strong curvature compared to the others like a BH. But this solved in a weird way does = 2 ħ/ Δx Δῥ = 2 and 2π/Δt + 2π/Δt = 4π/2Δt = 2π/Δt as ω = 2π/Δt = 2πf

Furthermore (Particle = Pixelation)(Wave = Ripple)(Rotation = Movements in circles)(Preccession = Vibration) More of any of these means greater magnitude or more dominate of that effect.