Vmedvil

In any case, now the models look something like this with the SNF's,WNF's, and EM's Energy-mass along with wave and particle forms simultaneously of them, without Anderson's Precession. (WNF = Lines)(SNF = Green)(EM = Yellow)(Gravity = Orange)(All Merged = red)(EM + SNF + Gravity = Dark Orange)(EM + Gravity = Light Orange) Without Rotation with Anderson's Precession. Couldn't do both in a animation at the same time correctly, it lags too much for watchers and doesn't take in the true values of both effects, but looked like this, the longer you look the image it gets closer to both effects being correct....... because of lag in your video processing, starting in Ultra slow motion then going slightly faster and faster as it loads/renders it, I tested this with my laptop and it does over time, but never fully renders.

Ari just posted its BIOS stable 4.2 GHz@ 27C with that processor but do not get that watercooler with that case, I had to cut the literal front off the computer with a fine toothed hacksaw then reattach it with superglue to mount it, that cooler is not 280mm, and actually measures 312mm, but everything else works no problems together, 5.3 GHz and 33 C.

and the reason why I think it is what dubblesiox is talking about is it has to same dimensions as ∇2 , which is 6 being that each Laplace has 3 dimensions within it, which would be like saying O(n6)

Which guv actually has 4 within it so 26+1 , all 0 so guv looks like a point String but it should not have that many dimensions extra. 10-D object. (4 + 6) They all say it is + 0 in value , so it doesn't effect them but still it says it is there.

Ya, I am still trying to figure out what that is O((1/h)4) on Laurent series. Mandlebrot equation h = ∞ , Anderson's O((1/x)6) x = ∞ on Laurent Series, O(x5) x = 0 Taylor Series, Einstein/my Equation Puiseux series O((1/g)6) g = ∞ , O(g6) puiseux series g = 0 which states at ∑S∑(1/x)6∑(1/guv)6∑(1/h)4∏O(2,∞,∞,∞,6) there is something odd, which 1/∞ = 0 , then it is (2,0,0,0,6) Like it calculated the dimensions of it but not what it was. S X guv h O Which gives it 22 + 1 on h dimensions of direction. that are 0

It has to be like a tear in like space or something no idea.

I dunno but at summation coords ∑∑∑∑∏(2,∞,∞,∞,6) I dunno what it is.

No EFE, Anderson's , My equations, Mordred's equations,Fermilab's equations, Freidmann's, and Even the Mandelbrot all agree on that it is there.

Yes, but it is completely undefinable whatever that is which is uncertainty like manifest like Dubblesiox said, Dubblesiox are you trying to define this crap. ∏1∑1....2∑1.......∑nx1.........xn......nn6 , well it is ∑∑∑∑∏(2,∞,∞,∞,6) Well, No I thought you were trying to define something else; that there is like impossible to define.

Well, whatever it is is defined as the most horrible 1 Series 2 Series Infinite Series of Series and a Product Series of series.

Like dude if this is SU(n) = ∑1.......∑nx1.........xn......nn then that is like SU(2xnxnxnxnxnxn) = ∏1∑1....2∑1.......∑nx1.........xn......nn6

Hell, no its not. O(n×n×n×n×n×n)

They are too unstable to be accounted for, do you see those complex Big O notations that the computer went through like a bunch of different series and was unable to solve, that were like Big O notation rank 6 that is like saying SO(NNNNNN)

I will explain this way.

No, but you don't understand I used a fractal form and it still does it, no, that uncertainty principal is valid no matter how you do it, which sucks.

This term. i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψj Basically, any term of this ψ

In any case, Replicators are impossible below a certain point which is the quantum limit. like the ones the Star Trek completely impossible, which would have been cool to turn like Energy into food or something. Quantum Limit So, Ribosomes are about as small as you can go then on a assembler being molecular. You cannot let's say make a Quantum Assembler, Nano is about as small as you can get.

Well, it does account for EFE, but QM causes divergence of it.

So, I suppose it is actually uncertain and not a error in the equation and Einstein was actually wrong. Do you know who was right John Ford. Where that makes Matter Editation impossible in our universe, which was a concept from a video game that I though would be interesting to do. Matter Editation Sci Fi Game Something like Neutronium is impossible to stabilize which will decay in about 30 min as you cannot change how WNF interacts with it. Neutronium

Even Irreducibly Phase Locked with the observer effect it gives problems when I switch that. You know what, I will do it this way then ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp x vp)+GIs/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp x vp)+G(Is)/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + ((Ar(X) + (Ebx ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2/ε0 μ0)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(1/ε0 μ0)))1/2) ∑∇'/Δt = ∇1/Δt1 + ∇2/Δt2 + ∇3/Δt3 + ... + ∇n/Δtn ∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt) It's a Frequency so QM doesn't implode, have it your way.

And I pulled a error-ed version of Time Dilation does anyone not know the proper form. Which I screwed up that state change, forgot to removed 1/(), it has to be length contract or it mess with QM, how did I know you were going to give me problems Schrodinger. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp x vp)+GIs/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp x vp)+G(Is)/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + ((Ar(X) + (Ebx ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2/ε0 μ0)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(1/ε0 μ0)))1/2))

ks Works, but has a odd parity. Mordred's equation got an exact result. E was replaced with G Which even with my Residual SNF modification got an exact result, many variables were changed to other symbols. And I am not going to test Fermilab's equation there is no way it is wrong. State Change Unified Gravity Field in a time slice. ∇t'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp x vp)+GIs/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)((((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( ((2ħG/ε0 μ0))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + ((aji)) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ (3GMb/2(1/ε0 μ0)2Rs3(Rp x vp)+G(Is)/(1/ε0 μ0)Rs(3Rp/Rs2(ωpRp) - ωp))2))/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + ((Ar(X) + (Ebx ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2/ε0 μ0)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(1/ε0 μ0)))1/2)) Forever ∑∇t' = ∇t'1 + ∇t'2 + ∇t'3 + ... + ∇t'n ∑∇t' = Δt'

Part of S works. and S totally works but Anderson's Equation has roots but whatever, it worked in a Taylor Series and Laurent Series, I was replaced by F, which I am convinced is because S has no value without the other EQ.

EXACTLY! Now, Many bodies Many C's ∑tp∑C = tp1C1 + tp2C2 +...... + tpnCn , n2 = size change or ΔC2

Alright it is a very simple EQ tp∑C1 + C2 +...... + Cn n = size change or ΔC , which for a meter is 1/Lp