Vmedvil

Yes, just make sure that your virus that is used as a base for the vector is lysogenic and not lytic in its DNA machinery otherwise it won't work.

It is those fractions are Planck Times where Lp = tpC

Damn it, I don't care which way you do it, it will be the same as long as R = 1 on Angular, but yes I typed that quickly but it does not (MC2 + PC)2 ≠ M2C4 + P2C2

I just rooted the entire equation to not have to type all the exponents E2 = M2C4 + p2C2 either way.

I'll take that bet calculate for Linear Momentum E1 = MC2 + PC , where R = 1, then do the same for angular momentum and see if it is different when E2 = MC2 + PC , P = RL , L = Iω , I = MR2 you will find E1 = E2

Dude, I always believed it existed at the Planck scale it is there I have deceased to care transform Planck's constant in this equation into Planck units. Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,k,φ,ρ,m,S) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( (Mp2/2)Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji.) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - (Mbωs(ksGuv./guv8πG)1/2 + mk2)Rs2/2)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( (Mp2/2)Rs -(1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ2/2Mb)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(( (Mp2/2)Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)))1/2(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs(ksGuv./guv8πG)1/2 + mk2)/2Mb)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)(1/2)(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)(2ħωs)) - (ks(1/ε0 μ0)/Rs2) + (ksGuv/guv8πG ))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(1/ε0 μ0)))1/2))Mb(1/ε0 μ0) It basically says the scale of G is ħ on length and time Planck beyond that personally I do not care what happens being the size of a string.

No, the Radius term is just missing in pC being 1 for E = MC2 + pC Which would be the radius from the observer frame R or l, which is 1 in linear but in angular is not always 1. Which does require an acceleration to do, but is not the reason why.

Is it really different besides being over a radius?

then it is just rest mass, then why is it moving if p = 0

Yes, You know I am just screwing with the two of you but seriously yes Mordred where you are like the second picture and Polymath is like the first in that 50 post debate.

Yes the Rest Mass which is bound at every point within the Fermions and the Energy-Stress or Relativistic mass which is not.

Well, it would turn the center of rotation into the BH because of the pC term.

Yes, but the stress is not within the same body look at the direction of ac and p.

What is rest mass?, it is the mass of these particles rest energy which is E = MC2 , pC is KE or that.

Yes, but it constructed of particles at some point you hit Up and Down quarks along with electrons due to "Hydrostatic" stress on the space and it is being directed toward the "Hydrostatic" axis remember GR views energy as a Perfect fluid. The "Hydrostatic" Stress by the energy acts as a second object, which could be said to be not different than the effect of mass on that space.

Ya, see thats kinda what I thought too, wouldn't an increased Relativistic mass, increase gravitational potential energy. One can also say that, averaged over all directions, the tidal gravity increases when an object moves. ... Note that in General Relativity, gravity is caused not by mass, but by the stress–energy tensor. Thus, saying that a moving particle has "more gravity" does not imply that the particle has "more mass". But, it has more of both in this case, Energy and Relativistic Mass near or at the speed of light. Where this is flawed logic you need an acceleration to generate energy it would stay constant @ 3000 kmh as you need an acceleration to transfer energy as E = Δx a M E = Energy Δx or R = Distance a = Acceleration M = Mass Not velocity, but acceleration, which Km / h is velocity. The acceleration here in toward the middle frame, thus energy is transferring toward the center of rotation frame not the spin frame.

Guys, this is not a political debate this is science. You sound like two political parties fighting about global warming or something.

That sounds like Ebola Virus based on the blood vessels and hemorrhage bullae with a "fever" state, the skin matches Ebola Virus too then again if he had seen swelling a week ago with Ebola Virus he would be dead at that point so probably a bacteria. So, Function was right, but that did sound like day 9-10 symptoms of Ebola Virus.

I had no idea strange, I thought the relativistic mass increase would do it eventually.

Well, if you did reach the speed of light the relativistic mass would be so large it would turn into a blackhole wrap your mind around that.

Well, ya, I have to thank Hawking's book Universe in a nutshell when I got lost on one part. Chapter 2: The Shape of Time and Chapter 4: Predicting the Future.

Ya, people give summations compared to Integrals little credit but when they help they really do, ya I had no idea how to bring SNF and WNF into the fold.

Yes and No everyone had their own thoughts about this subject, somewhere right, somewhere wrong like on the QM part ultimate it did actually for something like a Mandelbrot set.

You have a point if this forum didn't have a >> button I bet they wouldn't read this far tho.

Yes, but like 265 posts deep.