Vmedvil

There aren't enough dimensions for that eventually it will cap out when all variables are defined it won't be SU(n) it will be less than that.

Oh, I know why do you think I never want to do a complete cross product on that equation and why wolfram alpha said "Do not understand" when I put for it to cross product it.

Oh in qubits, yes I did think you meant binary. ' 16777216 I think that is actually E7 x E7 , E8 x E8 = 10000000000

64

what α2 + β2 = 1 , SU(2), the 2 comes from the Squared relation being 1

How so, ∑∑ x1.... xnn = SU(2) where SU(3) =∑∑∑ x1.... xnnn, Where SU(n) = ∑1.......∑nx1.........xn......nn

Summation

Ya, I don't use integrals have you ever seen me use one?

Yes Mordred I fully understand how all that works.

Yes, but with a different size which even applies the same shape everything will be slightly different which will take time to get correct magnetic field strength and such real life isn't always as pretty as theoretical values and models, it is always more variable, why because of the planck constant being so small and actions of length and time being the same way.

Yes, but the Europeans had to build it larger to do that I know but it has not been built yet, when it finally comes online you may find "Technical Difficulties" that were unexpected you know how that goes.

but like I said it is variant it is not perfectly correct needs to be invariant under automorphisms, I will explain it this way in Molecular biology Certain Envelope layers of viruses will accept other viruses glycoproteins which makes them invariant under automorphism from those virii's glycoprotiens where others like the Adenovirus's Envelope will only accept their own glycoproteins having a different structure from most virii. Variant automorphic viruses (Adenovirus) Variant Automorphic virus. (Bacteriophage T4) Invariant Automorphic viruses. (HIV) (Rabies) (SARS) (Ebola) (Measles) (Flu)

It does if the equation is in the right form.(Vector Bundle)

Yep, but isn't smooth kinda look at the shape of the curves.

No the fractal geometry can be defined by a SO(n) group which is smooth kinda, despite what it looks like in that picture its transformations were still smooth.

Kinda I was taking 299792458(1/Δt) as a dimensionless or dimensional constant dependent on 1/Δt which is a frequency to fix the mixed conversion until something defines that better as V would also equal 299792458 where MC2 = Ma, the values would be the same but different dimensions, which you can technically do as long as the values match at every point in the system exactly, like MC2 ≠ Ma, but does = Ma(1/Δt @ 299792458, where V is also @ 299792458 ) even though a Δx is missing, if a = V (1/Δt), which the simple conclusion would be at there is a missing Δx = 299792458, but since it has to be a, we will just say dimensionless constant that equals 299792458.

Space for Perfect Torus k = 553 Time s = 20, ΔΘ = 9 Time Torus oh ya, there is a wormhole but you could never escape every path does literally lead back inside and reverse time travel has to be impossible your best bet would be to gun it near an edge, but you would still be pulled back in but you could possibly sit there.

s = 3 Torus ΔΘ = 60 Time s = 7 Torus ΔΘ = 25.7 Time s = 20 Torus ΔΘ = 9 Time Torus shaped. k = 553 Space Sphere shaped. k = 553 Space Torus s = 20, k = 553, ΔΘ = 9 Space-time Sphere s = 20, k = 553, ΔΘ = 9 Space-time

Like you said equation by far the most screwed up shape you can bend a BH into.

Ya, I tried a Transformation of SR @ C, it starts to give nonsense answers to stuff even if you take two C frames minus each other the geometries work but the answers are definitely not correct. See, I tried to take Gravity @ C versus Rotation @ C to transform it down to not being undefined despite being not undefined it gave odd answers for vectors within the geometric shape and not the geometric shape or vertices. In any case, you cannot use the Light-like Worldline as a base reference frame or you get some really inaccurate answers at certain times for time-like worldlines, why because half the cone is in space while the other half is in time, the left edge is the time-like vector at that point where the right edge is a space-like vector, where zero is Light-like Vector, it does not operate probably under those conditions.

Well, ya I knew that was not Dark Energy, so it is Normal Matter and Dark matter, but I knew DE didn't group that way, that picture is a single time slice so it cannot be Dark energy which required a time component.

Ya, I am done with this would admin please Lock or delete or trash this thread. I will screw with model on my own no longer taking comments. Ultimately equation 00000543252, you have failed your master time for you to be throw away like the trash you are for being variant under what some may call kinda messed up conditions but still. ∇'(x',y',z') = ∇(1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2 Though you did yield one interesting fact, the shape a Tipler cylinder must be. I Suggest deletion but do whatever you would like.

Okay, do you wanna know what the ultimate problem is for fusion reactors you can generate a strong enough magnetic field to fuse it in plasma state, but the energy released is less than the energy required to confine it even with superconductors.

Um, ya I don't mean to go off topic but that is dark matter, the picture, Dark energy does not group like that, it is equal in all parts of the universe to human knowledge, which mordred already said that after reading past that point, so whatever, but that is Dark Matter not Dark Energy.

It can be done, deemed unethical.