Vmedvil

Well, No, it does not work that way for DNA damage, the DNA cannot become resistant to damage via evolution to my knowledge being a Atomic Process and not chemical, "killing" the Ku Complex does not matter the cells will just produce more unless the DNA is damaged that the Ribosome processes to create that to protein. If the DNA is damaged or mutated it will stop creating the proteins that repair these Double breaks the Ku Complex(Protein), Thus you cannot Selectively Mutate it to become more resistant what you could do is over-express the gene and make more per visit by RNA Polymerase via Promoter added before the gene. If you want to kill the Ku Complex(Protein) then you would need to use a CRISPR or Cas9(Protein) with a RNA guide that matches a important part of the gene to Silence it.

Well, Viruses don't really need "Food" they are just seeking to reproduce and they need our Ribosomes to do it. As for Bacteria Amino acids, Sugars, anything that you need to survive they kill your cells to feed themselves which have a bunch of it within them.

Well, I dunno if this has been brought up or not but have you ever heard of Digital Immortality or Immortality in silicon? The Transhumanists think that you can store your living mind inside a computer which would be a sort of life after death using a Mind Machine Interface/Brain Computer Interface (MMI/BCI) as for myself I have thought about the usage of Viral Nanobots(Viral Gene Therapy) to repair DNA structure as it decays(Biological Immortality) but not really life after death, but as I think the Mind Upload would not actually be you just a perfect copy. In any case, it would be process called Mind Uploading in that case of Digital Immortality.

Ya, no you will never get it that small in organic Nano-machines or Cells.

Well, technically as you go smaller you lose neuron room, now if they constantly get more dense as your head gets smaller then yes, same intelligence smaller package, but why would you want to do this. Technically you could go smaller and smaller until the neurons get so dense that blood cannot reach them or cell membranes start to rupture under their own pressure.

ICBM's and Nuclear weapons in general in 2012-2012 where obsoleted, So I would say that they are very pointless compared to smaller more dangerous things like Synthetic Germ(Synthetic Germs for Modern Warfare)(Genetic Engineering and Biological warfare NBCI)(President of Russia, Putin, mad at US for Bioweapons labs in Europe.) warfare which is banned(UN BWC) but you know is still being done(Most people don't know that), but I think ICBMs are still useful for other purposes such as "Hostile Aliens"(the ones from space) or Mars reheat(Elon Musk Nuke mars to reheat) if you believe in that sort of thing, but no Nuclear weapons are never used and just waste much money to upkeep viewed as a status thing as Ten oZ suggested up in the planetary governments arena, they flaunt them to loop the other nation into a M.A.D.(Putin Threatens Nuclear War on US.) situation to make them back down. As for Russia and the US agreeing about its disarmament, I highly doubt that(US and RU Relations in 2017). Note: I have used Russia or specifically Putin for many examples but all sides do this.

a = V(299792458) (1/Δt)

Dimension consistency can be altered at any time to another property, it does not matter it can be recombined to be consistent if needed. Hustle no, I need to know something, it is of extreme importance to me personally, time is of the essence in this matter.

Do you really wanna know what the problem with all that is, YOU CANNOT DEFINE IT Below that in math. It has to be Defined if you generate it from nothing it would take like 500 years or more just like mankind and that was with 100,000 + people that really knew what they were doing. So good luck you have 500,000,000 years of work ahead of you. And where you cannot call this wrong why, this is the reason why. Evidence of rotation = C

Polymath read about Reimann Geometry. Introduction to Riemann Geometry.

Yes, Gravity only as the Schwarzchild metric other parts use other parts, otherwise there would be no negative against it, which goes back to ∇Eb(x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + V)2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Where V = C and C - C = 0 which is the same as saying 0 + V2 Where in space is wrote in SR as it solves for Δx' ∇'(x',y',z') = ∇(1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2

Was that applying to my post or Polymath's

In any case, before Dubblesoix invaded, which was fair an eye for an eye, saying that I was going to cause the end of the world not via zombie apocalypse what where you saying Mordred.

And no Superpolymath they were never your concepts, I adopted concepts from string theory, not yours which yours are made from, that why I always say "stealing" the Hubble constant and etc.

Do you see dubbesoix where you said Rij = [∇i,∇j] , What is the volume of Δ[∇i,∇j] dV , if not a planck unit, if your volume is not in meters then why did you say this equals ΔE being joules when takes times (C4/8πG)........................... Why can your masterfully perfect Equation not take a simple meters calculation for volume in Lp

Well, now I know who down-voted me and no I was trying to resolve them to a Planck length Dubblesoix that was all did I know exactly how to do it, No, but yes I did totally hijack that thread under thinking that my model could include Hilbert space at the volume spot of your equation and where yours could be on Planck level as well, I did with a series of redirects fix that would have said nothing if I had known it were going to piss you off.So, people would know that it was too simple to be Real universe I had thought it was close enough to be "Real Universe". When it said dV, I tried to solve for dV on the scale the hillbert space happens which is a Planck length which then tried to convert into meters as it said "ΔE" using elementary constants, If that 1/Lp = Meters, that's why it said that, if you still don't understand you are not as good at this as you thought even with your master's degree in physics, Secondly your symbol were in ∇ where ∇E should have solved for when you said "Oh its Energy"

In any case, this would work in the L form. You knew I would try it, chronon which equals 6.27×10-24 Seconds where tp = 5.39×10-44 seconds Which goes to something odd with an electron. ∇Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,ρ,m) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Mb(ℓ(ℓ+1))ħ2(1.112121525278619076*10-68)(((6.27×10-24)Δ(ec2(2.5669699216746244*10-38)/6πε0MbC3)/(5.39×10-44)Δtp)(ks2 + mk2)1/2/24Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)d3p) - (ksC2/Rs2) + (Λ/3))1/2(Δx/3.08567758128*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 ec = -1 ℓ = 2 ħ = 1 Rs = radius of electron in meters. Mb= Rest Mass of electron in Kilograms.

Alright then the tachyon is the closest thing to that it moves backward through time Tachyon Wiki, but still not a "Time Particle", which usually means certain problems for any theory with them, tachyons that is, but I guess there is the Chronon.

That I am aware of Star Trek the Chroniton. Star Trek Time Particle Planck Time can sorta be considered like this but not really a particle like the photon that is Quantized light but it is Quantized time.

Actually this solved cleaner than I thought, now ωs2 = k2 + mk2 ∇Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,ρ,m) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Is(ks2 + mk2)/2Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)d3p) - (ksC2/Rs2) + (Λ/3))1/2(Δx/3.08567758128*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Where Is = (1/12)ML2 ∇Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,ρ,m) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (MbLs2(ks2 + mk2)/24Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)d3p) - (ksC2/Rs2) + (Λ/3))1/2(Δx/3.08567758128*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Or Is = (1/2)MR2 ∇Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,ρ,m) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (MbRs2(ks2 + mk2)/4Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/e((E - μ)/T)±1)d3p) - (ksC2/Rs2) + (Λ/3))1/2(Δx/3.08567758128*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Back to unsolved for anything. ∇Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,ρ) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/e(E-μ/T)±1)d3p) - (kC2/R2) + (Λ/3))1/2(Δx/3.08567758128*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2

∇Eb(x,y,z,t,ω,M,I,ρ) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/e(E-μ/T)±1)d3p) - (kC2/R2) + (Λ/3))1/2Δx(1/3.08567782*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Okay, I finally got what those meant when i was rereading the post.

So, as respect to, then this is wrote correctly. ∇Eb(x,y,z,ω,M,R,I,ρ) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫E(pfpd3p) - (kC2/R2) + (Λ/3))1/2Δx(1/3.08567782*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Basically, are those nested variables or with respects to, respects get subbed. Wait I see what you did now, okay Hold on. ∇Eb(x,y,z,ω,M,R,I,ρ) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(p2 + mp2)1/2(1/eE-μ/T±1)d3p) - (kC2/R2) + (Λ/3))1/2Δx(1/3.08567782*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2

Second question when it says ρ =(g/(2π)3)∫E(p f(p )d3p is f(p ) with respect to or an actual variable, same with d3p

I made this equation to be easily changed but explain it detail what all that does it so i understand how it is to be used. ∇Eb(x,y,z,ω,M,R,I,ρ) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫E(pfpd3p) - (kC2/R2) + (Λ/3))1/2Δx(1/3.08567782*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Taking in account for now.

Hold on stealing now.