Vmedvil

So, if I steal the Hubble constant and that energy density for matter density does that fix it. ∇Eb(x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (HΔx(1/3.08567782*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Where H Then ρ =(g/(2π)3)∫E(p⃗ f(p⃗ )d3p

Which I know the sign of expansion will be positive like a Friedmann equation to matter density, but I wanna see what you type up in latex. Could it be as simple as steal the hubble constant and put it as velocity being in units of kilometers per second per megaparsec. Like V = H * Δx(Kiloparsec) where Kiloparsec = 3.086e+19 meters. ∇Eb(x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + V)2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Then it would read ∇Eb(x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb) + (HΔx(1/3.08567782*1019)))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 In any case, I will let you latex that now.

We have not gotten to that part yet we are proofing this, where your model enters when ω2 = k2 + m2 , somehow this needs to take account for expansion the equation which that is a solution to.

Well, No I get the samething either way yes it agrees with the Einstein tensor and Gobel's Universe model as ω2 = u

Well, that explains alot if I took the integral wrong there, see I acted as if k was a constant in the integral of that.

And no it does not take in account anything to do with Hubble's constant, but that is handled by ωs , I thought that Kerr Metric took in account for that as a spinning BH where expansion is the spin of the object. Where a =ω(I/M) , all I did is take the integral of it. Where this is super nested.

Where it is like that if R goes to L, the Lagrangian forms are compatible, it is in that form being the same as radius with a different geometry operator being 1/12 or 1/2 or whatever, where 1/12 means rod or QFT geometry.

Where I accounts for density, counting each object at a radius as individual objects, which have a total mass of Mb or ∑M = M1 + M2 + M3 ..... Mn Where Is or ∑ I = M1R12 + M2R22 + M3R32 + ..... + MnRn2

depends on the total mass of an object or set of objects, which defines everything from that, really this is coded kinda like a physics engine for a video game. I is like saying object.

Well, there is a problem with that when one considers small scale things it is not Homogeneous and Isotropic, this cannot just define the big it has to define both. I defines sub structures like Quantum mechanics and QFT which makes homogeneous too simple. Where The Special Relativity part makes Isotropic too simple. You cannot have it Isotropic and Homogeneous when taken in account the things GR doesn't, GR assumes it is a perfect fluid and not tons of small interactions. Where GR is taken account by Schwarzchild Metric and Kerr Metric as ωs and Rs

Where did you see that I need to know the context. Under the Blink Operator, whenever energy is lost to somewhere else or gained to self that is how the equation handles that.

Yes once it hits space. Where you may want to read this too. More ways I have broken this down.

Well, I have gone through this with dubblesiox here. Freidmann Cosmology Rotation.

Ya, I don't have a collection but this comes from Medvil's Archive as sources.

Well, no I thought you split and didn't move it, I was talking about the Thread in M&T.

Nevermind I thought you split and didn't move it.

Lol, it stopped being entirely mainstream at post about 2 so I would have said that long ago. Hold on let me redirect this.

Ya, that was what I was thinking.

So, know what lets define this as same universe multiple Big Bangs from USMBH (Ultra Supermassive Black Holes), Hyperspace removed, where that universe is near heat death or in the BH Era as the density is so low as much of space is empty between Black-hole Explosions.

Ya, if we didn't definite this by CMB Lightcones then it would be just one huge universe with a bunch of smaller ones within it, even other galaxies could be considered other universes under that. Anywhere where that is a big void between it and us, Empty space.

Ya exactly where CMB is able to reach it is what Fusion of Universe means or fission unable to reach since that is what we base "Universe Radius" as CMB reachable @ C, beyond that lightcone would be another universe by physics definitions.

You took that in the wrong context Universe Fusion/Fission from the Dynamic DE, at some point it has to break or merge otherwise the wormholes don't work.

Ya, but what I am pointing out is this is never going to pass the observation and experimentation test in the 2000s to 2100s, where White Holes have never been seen nor Universe Fusion or fission along with Universe Death Scenarios or even if QE happens on BH. We have stacked this on guesses of mainstream science which were guesses and assumed them correct where that still is just a guess it was based on.

Well, I am going to shelf this for now, this is starting to turn from Modern physics to speculation on both our parts though I agree, honestly there is no way to experimentally prove it wrong or right for like billions of years. This is something that could not be done on lab scale and would needs to be physically watched to know. We need to see a galaxy branch off from our universe into its own universe or another universe slam into ours.

Where the Hyper-universe which our universe would be like a BH in must be close to Thermal death with a bunch of BH in it, like our BH Universe because those would be the only thing to survive toward the big rip, because physics says that our universe will just have a bunch of BH left in it when it is close to Thermal death if expansion continues, where that logic makes endless layers of universe inside of Bigger universe where that Hyper-Universe must be approaching thermal death, where its Hyper-Hyper-Universe must have ripped already or is really close in thermal death, where the Hyper-Hyper-Hyper-Universe has to have already ripped. Where this looks to be a repeating pattern, but you will have to wait a long time to find out. Then again it says that all Sub universes or BH would evaporate before that point, that were smaller than 10 Billion Solar masses, which our universe is definitely larger than 10 billion solar masses, so it may not have, so it is actually possible for a BH to survive past its Hyper-universe's Thermal death era into Big Rip or actual Thermal Death, if massive enough, which no doubt is rare. So, why did I go off on this tangent to see something about this, could a BH survive a Big Rip of its parent universe and the answer is yes, if massive enough meaning a huge Rs which may be equivalent to Ru