Vmedvil

See, I thought that initially that it was Strong Quantum entanglement like space , but then I got a speed of 600 something C for speed instead of around 10,000 C, I will look into otherwise, I am done trying to GR+SR with QFT + QM, it and just drawing the model like this. Physics people go on strike against math until math people can unify their four models without anomalies. You know how math majors make fun of art majors well art can do something math cannot currently produce the UFT in physics with no problems.

I typed that wrong, I meant to say how does F4 x E7 = SO(28) not SO(32) then realized that math theory was wrong and it does actually go E8 which would make that SO(32) Otherwise it doesn't match up to cancel which means that "E8 cannot be composed of lesser groups" is WRONG!. Why because if that doesn't go E8 it says all of math is wrong past like Calculus 1 or 2 due to those equations being composed of nearly everything after that.

Hell, No GR and QM are just not compatible I tend to believe now. I dunno, how all those equations can be correct and still get a wrong SO(n) group where you get SU(2) and SU(3) where somehow F4 x E7 ≠ E8 I think somewhere along the line the mathematics guys/girls screwed up, physics blames math for this. In any case, yes there is a wormhole where you sync ω1 - ω2 = 0 , which links Hilbert space A and B which is the same as weak Quantum Entanglement, see this is the same problem again, when you link these it just generates anomalies bad even in supposedly anomaly free groups. WTF?, everything else points to this being right no anomalies in the linkage EQ's or any of the defining EQ's but somehow it still doesn't group correctly. After, my rant i realized yes E8 can be composed of lesser groups was your error math people, it does go E8 which F4 x E8 = SO(32) which with that 1/ħ = 1

Where a = fine structure constant "Mass" being e2/ ħC which turns acos(Θ) into mass where r - acos(2Θ) = 0 which means 2M - r = 0 where 2MG - IC2 = 0 So, I don't think the error is with the quaternionic equation or even dubblesiox's equation which it is definately not the D-brane, Kerr-Schwarzchild, or Schrodinger Equation, so I don't know at this point.

I dunno why that latex bugged. [latex] \frac{ds}{dt} = \frac{1}{\hbar} \frac{c^4}{8 \pi G}\sqrt{<\psi|R_{ij}|\psi>} = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sqrt{<\psi|H|\psi>} [/latex] Whatever Here Where his equation says that Which my equation says diag[0,0,0,C] or when ω2 = C2 [0,0,0,0] like Fuv , but actually it is 7 so, [0,0,0,0,0,0,0] after absorbing Tuv x Fuv which Tuv = Guv ∇'(x',y',z') = ∇(1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2 Then Eb(t,ω,R,M,I) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 Which is odd upon ωs2 = k2 + m2 Does go E8 so I dunno where a reverse solve goes into Schrodinger EQ ∇ = ∇'(x',y',z')(1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2 Then ∇ = Eb(t,ω,R,M,I) (1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2))MbC2 R = ∇ which the kerr-child metric agrees with my ω2

Oh, so I messed up my E7 to E8 transformation on my equation too, see i didn't realize that, I thought SU(2) and SU(3) were compatible., Yes which would make that 2 x 2 meaning F4 which could be used with a E8 which that E7 is like that too, I dunno how to fix that tho. So, his is a F4, mine is a E7 and we are trying to cancel it with E8 x E8, how do you fix that? Octonionic vs Quaterooctonic vs octooctonionic symmetry. the octonionic projective plane – FII, dimension 16 = 2 × 8, F4 symmetry, Cayley projective plane P2(O), the bioctonionic projective plane – EIII, dimension 32 = 2 × 2 × 8, E6 symmetry, complexified Cayley projective plane, P2(C ⊗ O), the "quateroctonionic projective plane"[2] – EVI, dimension 64 = 2 × 4 × 8, E7 symmetry, P2(H ⊗ O), the "octooctonionic projective plane"[3] – EVIII, dimension 128 = 2 × 8 × 8, E8 symmetry, P2(O ⊗ O). See, now I am confused wouldn't F4 x E7 = E8 Which F4 x E7 /E8 x E8 = 1/ E8 Yes? Which I can think of a E8 that would work being 1/ħ ħ = Planck action. Which I am going to barrow this, sorry Dubblesiox [ latex ] \frac{ds}{dt} = \frac{1}{\hbar} \frac{c^4}{8 \pi G}\sqrt{<\psi|R_{ij}|\psi>} = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sqrt{<\psi|H|\psi>} [ /latex ]

Ya, then your really not going to like that one being SO(32)/ SO(32) = 1 , but here is a paper on it. SO(32) Explained for Heterotic String. But it is composed of two E8 groups or E8 x E8' = SO(2 * n) , n = 8 + 8 = 16 where Dubblesoix's E8 * tp2 = 1 and my E8 * C2 = 1 That being my reasoning that it is balanced in that last form. E8 x E8 also equaling P2(O x O) = P2O2 E8 Decomposition

Ya, it basically swallows it just like energy-mass or light.

Yeah, this looks correct, but it doesn't resolve anything about a BH, "resolves the Black Hole Paradox" ya, no past 3.3 until 4, you should have just said nothing everything there makes no sense and actually as someone whom has studied SMBH much I find that conclusion insulting.

Lol, a C or higher if you are taking AP courses, if you are taking easier courses I would say B or higher for a Microbiologist your entire major would look like this and I dunno about your fainting. Ball State University Microbiology Requirements.

I gotta say, I love my 500 ml 3.3 Borosilcate flasks that I bought for way cheap there, one survived a thermite reaction I did in it despite being really cheap on Ebay.

Insert the gene Via a constructed non- reproducing Plant Lentivirus or Lentiviral Vector is what I would do, but that would take longer than 3 weeks to complete, they are very efficient at sending DNA into cells, you would have a 99% or higher plant expression of the gene, I dunno at this point unless you have a Oligonucleotide synthesizer much better than mine at a cycle of 5 minutes.

Here is what two anti parallel DNA would look like does it look like that?

Ebay it, that is the cheapest source in my experience, most of it being second hand lab equipment.

Here, what I would do design your own plasmid "Synthetic Bacteria" it will help you learn and do something constructive. Addgene Plasmid Bank Otherwise, go to the national center for biotechnology website and look up your bacteria it will tell what all defined proteins do in the organism. NBCI

the difference would be FIVTYW VS WYTVIF , just like a chirality, but like 3' 5' vs 5' 3' would not be which should make sense, not actually being chiral being flipped but with a different structure.

Well, on another forum dubblesoix had posted his Gravity model and I started to use Super-gravity equations on it, what is wrong with this, it turned into something strange which I am starting to call a "Wormhole metric" upon E transformation, this has to be wrong I still think what is your opinion on this, the equations that compose it are not wrong but this just seems odd. Dubblesoix's toy model taken way too far, I think. And Before Hand thanks, I know this is a long post to read, just to tell me how wrong the three of us are I blame myself and Polymath for not just dropping it at dubblesoix's solution.

You have too much love in your heart, be like me love only yourself. I tend to find it extremely difficult to tolerate one person with day to day contact much less two, people tend to annoy me over time, I find myself slowly growing to hate the people I have day to day contact with. So, I will stop here before this turns into a hate speech against humanity, but realize I am not Racist, Sexist, or Classist your all hated equally as human beings..... So, as a person that loves no one or never has I would tend to say just get annoyed by repetitive patterns of humans and you will stop loving multiple people always looks at their flaws and not their strengths, then just in the back of your mind sometimes think to yourself what the hell is wrong with this planet to where you live with a race of autism. Take that mentality and you won't have that problem and stop caring about your fellow human becomes it doesn't really matter what they think your mind is inside your body not theirs who cares it is not like you feel their pain or nerve impulses.

Let's see if this flys, this is an equation I designed to explain, the inside of a BH, All hail the quantum gravity equation, Medvil's Kerr Hack, you can't prove it wrong C - C = 0 Spin versus the gravity well @ Rs ∇'(x',y',z') = ∇(1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2 and ∇Eb(t,ω,R,M,I) = ∇(1/((1-(((2MbG / Rs) - (Isωs2/2Mb))2/C2))1/2))MbC2

what you are describing could be shown as a special relativistic light cone with imaginary values being the inverse universe which always be in the past from the view of this universe and vice versa. That works under SR.

Well, it is a slide from "Presentation on theme: "Hawking radiation as tunneling from squashed Kaluza-Klein BH Ken Matsuno and Koichiro Umetsu (Osaka city university) (Kyoto sangyo university) Phys. Rev."— Presentation transcript:" it is on slide player, (Presentation transcript)

Well, here is the equation if it is actually quantum tunneling. The Larger the BH the lower the hawking radiation that is correct but the different between matter and antimatter in the early universe was only a very small matter in the orders of 1:1.000000001 ratio, what if those particles could do that process as well that are charged where the electron escapes and the position goes into the abyss.

Well, photons escape atoms, I don't think they are going to escape this place unless they tunnel out as hawking radiation, it requires sacrifice and possibly the reason we don't see equal amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe.

Spot on, let's move to a spinning black-hole when they do this, The Kerr Metric. Looks strangely familiar to a object we all know Dense core with things orbiting infinitely around it in weird orbitals, almost like a atom.

You did either it goes faster than the speed of light or sits at the event horizon forever with a endless tug of war between gravity with a velocity of C and light against it with a velocity at C at 180 the direction. So, it just sits there with zero velocity in that relative frame.