Vmedvil

This thread is done everything matches now.

A example Site key would be GGGggccatagcaaccaggtgagccagaactatccgattgtgcagaacattcagggccagatg RNA Cipher GGGGGCCAUA GCAACCAGGU GAGCCAGAAC UAUCCGAUUG UGCAGAACAU UCAGGGCCAG AUG Which the Virus will go through metamorphism upon entry of the Guide RNA Cipher to the CRISPR becoming millions of times more deadly and 20 times more infectious on Version 2 on Version 1 it will reproduce fully active after being a non reproducing version. "Metamorphic code is used by some viruses when they are about to infect new files, and the result is that the next generation will never look like current generation. The mutated code will do exactly the same thing (under the interpretation used), but the child's binary representation will typically be completely different from the parent's. Mutation can be achieved using techniques like inserting NOP instructions (brute force), changing what registers to use, changing flow control with jumps, changing machine instructions to equivalent ones or reordering independent instructions." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamorphic_code In any case, here is the true complexity of coding molecular machines, that everything has to be perfect and function perfectly or it will error out.

In any case, Harvester Project closed this is lethal, infectious, and unstoppable enough in my view, this would Bio apocalypse the planet within a year as soon as it hit the ocean with a RNA Guide Activator. I can only think of one way to make this more screwed up which is to use a different DNA Endonuclease but then people that are unworthy could use it that did not know what they were doing which would make it always fully active. This Version does not function without a RNA Guide Activator which is specific for person that synthesizes the key design and Virus, it being Immune to Nano-particles. just sits dormant only infecting T-cells in this version without a RNA Guide Activator which is specific for person that synthesizes the key design and Virus.

Well, my Issue is with (-/+) Charged pions being (DU , UD) The Proton is UUD while the Antiproton is UUD when they bind it should not have more than three pairs of pions and they should all be neutral for everything to be conserved as neutral pions are (DD . UU) making Quarks (Flavor field) UUD + UUD ------> UU + UU + DD Color Field RBG + RBG -------> RR +BB +GG Charge Field p+ + p− → π0 + π0 + π0 but for some reason Sensei said it was otherwise.

Random downvotes huh, I see how it is I would downvote you but it wouldn't matter until I did it like 2628 times, which would take way too much effort. Ya, two can play this game. But this isn't facebook, so I won't downvote you 2628 times, I am not some spiteful teen.

That was not very nice.

Original Thread being hijacked, why isn't the color field conserved in QCD on P+ , P- collisions, which I brushed on in this topic of why it should be 3 neutral pions. that decay into 6 Photons. The Color field has symmetry so why isn't this used at low energies, p+ + p− → π0 + π0 + π0 Then π0 → γ + γ https://webific.ific.uv.es/web/en/content/lattice-qcd-numerical-approach-strong-force https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-physics/chapter/33-5-quarks-is-that-all-there-is/

Well, Ya, I agree with dubblesiox there is a V term on the Watson Hamiltonian for Nuclei Angular Momentum and molecular binding for potential kinetic energy of the nucleus. The quarks within the Nucleons of the nuclei are spinning so why would the Nucleus not be? https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-physics/chapter/33-5-quarks-is-that-all-there-is/

Yes, Momentum is converted to Rest Mass Via the Higgs Mechanism in a Symmetry break, the Rest Mass of a Tauon is 1.777 Gev, so the pair would be 3.554 Gev for Tauon conversion while Muon is 105.7 Mev so 211.4 Mev for the pair.

It was answered, Electron on Electron Medium energy then Muons and Tauons for higher energy. https://faraday.physics.utoronto.ca/PVB/DBailey/SubAtomic/Lectures/LectF14/Lect14.htm https://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/~krauss/Lectures/QuarksLeptons/QED/FeynmanRules_3.html

But Planck Level is still good the level of Quantum Loop and String Theory meaning it is really accurate despite the fact that I disagree with your conclusion that Dark Matter and Dark Energy do not exist. The Ps in that model would be Lp

In any case, that is a void point for these they are the Creators of QCD and fermilab's/CERN's along with the creator of the Standard Model's, but assumed people realized that I didn't do a particle test in my basement nor create the Standard model or QCD.

Like this ceased to be anyone but mine when it became 50% different from the US military designs which are the original viruses code. Same with these vectors are mine as they are 40% different than Addgene's and as the MV-x label goes higher they are more mine, you could probably dispute a MV-2 or MV-3 still being theirs by about 4 and above is mine.

According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, to "plagiarize" means: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own to use (another's production) without crediting the source to commit literary theft to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source. well, I guess I broke the second one, but it wasn't theirs to begin with those sites. I usually credit the actual person that discovered it. combinations of multiple ideas do not fall under 4 so, I have never broken that as long as they are 50% to 33% different. Ask a patent lawyer about that one.

Self-terminating Endoclease loops and Multivalent Vectors is mine but Cas9 is Jennifer Doudna , The Synthesis techique not yet posted is Craig Venter's modified by me for viruses and vectors. The Synthetic Integrase are mine, The rest of genes are from the NBCI. The Vector editing picture is a modified version of the one from addgene for Retroviral Plasmids which they never gave credit to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19423/

Well, it is not like they didn't steal it someone who did the actual work like maybe a scientist. isn't that a form of plagiarism. I don't see any credit to the creators of QCD or the Standard model on their websites either.

At some point, the Original papers of Schwarzchild,Hubble,Friedmann,Faddeev,Popov,Einstein,Watson,Higgs,Kerr, Yukawa, Schrodinger,Maxwell,Born,Planck, Brian Greene, Minokowski, Dr Michio Kaku, Dirac,Klein,Fermi, Anderson,Yau,Laplace and Steven Hawking.

Alright https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics https://webific.ific.uv.es/web/en/content/lattice-qcd-numerical-approach-strong-force https://www.quora.com/What-happens-when-an-electron-is-hit-by-a-positron https://physics.info/standard/ https://www.quantum-bits.org/?p=233 http://slideplayer.com/slide/5106047/ http://ed.fnal.gov/samplers/hsphys/old/activities old/top_quark_stud_old.html http://cms.web.cern.ch/news/new-two-particle-correlations-observed-cms-detector-lhc

In any case, It brings the readers directly to the exact point, I am talking about instead of reading the entire article on it.

Can you not read english strange, I thought the Chinese were taught English as a second language, assuming a "Coffee Shop" in china 珈琲店

Click them to enlarge.

Google QCD first link

Okay, but I don't get why it doesn't hold to color charge and Anti color charge symmetry rules being mesons generated in QCD.

well, ya I had always thought it was p+ + p− → π0 + π0 + π0 Then π0 → γ + γ

Correct form of low energy Proton-Antiproton. Sensei, why is it 5 (0,-,+) pions and not 3 or 6?