Vmedvil

Ya, that equation holds all the information of the larger one in much less detail just my showing it as a set of state coordinates for every length Planck, should be a huge number for all planck lengths for that radius of the universe with a state for every one.

Well, yes each part has its function only valued once unless other parts required it too for consistency none of it is double valued. You want to do it my way? Luniverse = (∇Charge,∇Color,∇flavour,∇gravity - ∇Dark Energy) charge possible states per point (1,2/3, 1/3, 0,-1/3,-2/3,-1) Color Possible states per point(R,B,G,0,G,B,R) Flavour possible states per point (I,II,III,0,III,II,I) Gravity/Dark Energy possible states per point of space (Energy,Mass,Spin,0,Energy,mass,spin) (Universe Volumetric Planck State @ size of universe in radius) =(3/4)π ((1/(tpC2)) Luniverse RUniverse)3

Okay, after much thought about this I think I am going to leave the Ghost Field Lagrangian undefined as not enough is known about QE to define it properly but that is actually a "good ghost field" so it stays as I do think they are virtual particle exchanges causing the linked states, that Watson Hamiltonian for atomic movement and molecular bonds will be added as correct and accurate for molecular bonds in "Real Universe". But I don't like that last term for V in this. Add Molecular bonds and atomic vibration etc Transform Ĥs = ((ħ2 /(2Erest/C2)) ∑3a =1 (d2/dX2) + (1/2)∑3a,β = 1 μaβ(Pa - Πa)(Pβ - Πβ) + U - (ħ2/2)∑3N-6s=1(d2/dq2) + V) ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,μ,Y,q,a,β) = (((ħ2 /(2Erest/C2)) ∑3a =1 (d2/dX2) + (1/2)∑3a,β = 1 μaβ(Pa - Πa)(Pβ - Πβ) + U - (ħ2/2)∑3N-6s=1(d2/dq2) + V)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμ(((Lghost QE - gfabc(δμ (c-bar)a)Aμbcc) / (c-bar)aδμca) + ig(1/2)τWμ + ig'(1/2)YBμ)ψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - (μ2((φ-Dagger)φ) + λ((φ-Dagger)φ)2)/-(((Lghost QE - gfabc(δμ (c-bar)a)Aμbcc) / (c-bar)aδμca) + ig(1/2)τWμ + ig'(1/2)YBμ)2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/ (((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp ))))Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/(((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp )))))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ±)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs) - ((ksC2)/ Rs2) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) And so not one gets the two totally different X variables confused, Transform X into moment of Inertia basically, which do share the same i X2 =((C2/Erest)∑Ni = 1 MiRi) ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,μ,Y,q,a,β) = (((ħ2 /(2Erest/C2)) ∑3a =1 (d2/d((C2/Erest)∑Ni = 1 MiRi)2) + (1/2)∑3a,β = 1 μaβ(Pa - Πa)(Pβ - Πβ) + U - (ħ2/2)∑3N-6s=1(d2/dq2) + V)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμ(((Lghost QE - gfabc(δμ (c-bar)a)Aμbcc) / (c-bar)aδμca) + ig(1/2)τWμ + ig'(1/2)YBμ)ψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - (μ2((φ-Dagger)φ) + λ((φ-Dagger)φ)2)/-(((Lghost QE - gfabc(δμ (c-bar)a)Aμbcc) / (c-bar)aδμca) + ig(1/2)τWμ + ig'(1/2)YBμ)2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/ (((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp ))))Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/(((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp )))))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ±)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs) - ((ksC2)/ Rs2) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2)

Well, I will say the other side of this Energy is conserved in Dark Energy because Curvature is balanced out by Radius increase in the Friedmann equation for Hubble constant or Dark Energy which causes the acceleration not increase in energy assuming energy conservation is absolute for the universe along with Energy is neither created or destroyed it just changes form and in that case the Universe will always have the same amount of Energy-Mass never changing in value just form. Otherwise Thermodynamics needs to be rewritten, unless the energy is being received from another universe in which case that would be fine with those laws under 1 and 2 as systems can transfer heat which is a type of Energy-mass between each-other.

I wouldn't doubt that.

Hey, don't disturb the natives on the moon Titan, there are Thiocyanide cell membranes forming for cells there for Methane life, Nitrogen Based in the pools of ethane and methane, go to Europa or something. Titan cell membrane like Bubbles found Carbon based cell membrane. Let them form it will take a several billions years but when the sun starts to Red giant hopefully they will get out of this solar system. Nanorobotics wiki

Oh, the cloud city like colony idea that was taken from Star Wars for Venus, maybe like that, but the surface is like hell.

Ya, I don' think that Venus would be a good choice something to do with high concentrations of sulfuric acid in its atmosphere unless you like sulfuric acid rain, better build your house out of glass. Venusian clouds are thick and are composed mainly (75-96%) of sulfuric acid droplets. These clouds obscure the surface of Venus from optical imaging, and reflect about 75% of the sunlight that falls on them. With Mars it is not about gravity it is about a lack of magnetic field every-time the Solar winds of the sun happen it blows away mars's atmosphere because of not having one unlike the Earth which when that magnetic field failed mars starts to become less earth like it was once every much like earth most people think before this loss of atmosphere due to magnetic field failure. Earth during a solar wind. Earth versus Mars magnetic field. So, that is why Mars's Atomsphere is so thin now versus when it used to be earth-like millions and billions of years ago.

Oh, I forgot to show the power supply for it, It is the same 750 Watt one as the last version, it is included in that price. I am currently Stress testing the previous one versus the New one in a contest of protein folding the 550 ti vs 1080 ti along with i5 2600k @ 3.7 GHz vs i7 7770k @ 4.7 GHz currently there protein folding score is way different on the graphics card front the 1080 ti is @ 108000 GPU points a day while the 550 ti @ 7000 GPU points a day. While the processors are less different i5 @ 800 CPU points a day while the i7 @ 3800 CPU points per day. New 70C versus Old 90C maxed. both 750 watts. So, it is between 4.75 and 15.4 times faster, about 6 teraflops total versus 34 teraflops total, together 40 teraflops total, with a teraflop value of 5.75 times faster. That GPU puts out alot of heat, which the CPU's do Indeed together act like a Intel Core i9-7920X Skylake X 12-Core 2.9 GHz , which that 1080 Ti + 550 ti does act about like two Kelper linked Teslas 40K's or a Tesla 80K system. Which I figure during the winter this is safer then a 1500 watt space heater for the backroom.1500 watt Space heater

I have wondered this and I don't know the answer is there are "Pain Chemical Messager" Or just lack of Dopamine causing pain? I want to know what actually activates the neurons that process pain. Dopamine "Pleasure" pathways, Processed in Frontal Cortex Neurons "Self Awareness part of that brain"

Here is the New Build list for 2018 the previous one was 2017 with 6 core 12 threads with 32 GB DDR 4 2666 along with a Ultra fast 10TB HDD.

That is true the genes that need to be mutated are the Apoptosis or Cell Cycle Checkpoint Activatation systems for cancerous cells to pass inspection but the other DNA Repair systems protect those from damage the odds are much more likely as those DNA Repair systems fail of a mutation of those going unnoticed or unfixed leading to cancer.

Ya, it is really amazing how much the sky of mars looks like Earth's minus the clouds. Um, you are not supposed to see this last one it is classified..... I mean photo-shopped, look at all the digital artifacts in that picture. Look at the Warping of the photo around the UFO on the left side. Digital Artifact Wiki

well, ya, I thought that would work until I realized it didn't have a x86 processor, which I don't know ARM processor instructions, but I am sure there is a equivalent to those in it, which this is all I could find about Arm Instructions, which I don't understand not being in Hexidemical. Arm Instruction list

Ya, I am about to eat my words I didn't think it was possible but there is a Brick Processor command in Iphones (0xFFs), that no that wouldn't work screw Apple. Ya, if they made something like this there is no way to keep it from bricking (Call to Interrupt, Brick)(0xCD,0xFFs) Even if you (Call to Interrupt, Halt Pipe) =(0xCD, 0xF4) It would still brick probably. I assumed Apple was dumber or smarter than that, that is a huge design flaw/protection mechanic, If you wanted to brick Iphones they have a built in way to do it.

Lol, no I know how to code something like that, that is easy my point was that there are things that can process something like that.

In any case, here is the Outbreak equation for Synthetic Virii, the one for other Self-replicating Synthetic machines are the same. Pf(t,R0) = P0 * (1/2)*(∑R0 =R1+R2+R3+...+Rn)2 * Δt R0 meaning Infections per day or replications per day for "real universe" Lets say Ebola-measles then R1 = 2 , R2 = 18

Oh, I have a computer that can calculate it, and it is not one constructed by Intel or AMD or Nvidia or Radeon or even D-wave. What do you think a planet stripped of resources by these things IQ or computational power would be SI Nano-factories, Furthermore what about a Star System or Galaxy. Nano-factories Video Animation from game.

My only hope after this is done is to get Particles over time that looks like this. ^ Causality > Time To an accurate enough point that it can be used to calculate "Real Universe"of that, I don't care the formalism it is about accuracy of the equation.

Not for others, for a computer, as long as the computer understands, I would never inflict the math required for this equation upon a human. The language part of their brain would bleed, don't want to cause any strokes.

yep, everyone would get cancer sooner or later if they lived long enough and didn't die from something else, because you gotta think as you get DNA damage so do the systems that protect against DNA damage being constructed from it as a blueprint for proteins. As more and more DNA protection systems fail because of DNA damage deforming the proteins that do the job of DNA protection, the closer and closer it creeps along to being a cancerous cell at an increasing rate. If you want to know about how the B-Cell version of cancer is cured here is a post about the leukemia cure on another site. "Living Drug"

Cancer is caused from genetic decay after long periods of aging in the past we did not live as long you would usually die from another cause but now as you live longer cancer becomes more dominate as you live long enough to die from DNA decay death which is cancer's cause. When Apoptosis or Cell Cycle Checkpoint Activatation fails to protect against systemic DNA damage cancer happens.

It is like peicemealing DLL together in a program as long as they are general enough it should work, but I don't like it using reynolds number, because I don't know if that holds true on this level.

Good enough for me if it works in parts it will works together. Sword = Dagger ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,μ,Y) = (Ĥs((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμ(((Lghost QE - gfabc(δμ (c-bar)a)Aμbcc) / (c-bar)aδμca) + ig(1/2)τWμ + ig'(1/2)YBμ)ψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - (μ2((φ-Dagger)φ) + λ((φ-Dagger)φ)2)/-(((Lghost QE - gfabc(δμ (c-bar)a)Aμbcc) / (c-bar)aδμca) + ig(1/2)τWμ + ig'(1/2)YBμ)2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/ (((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp ))))Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/(((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp )))))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ±)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs) - ((ksC2)/ Rs2) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) Next Part I don't like how this next part is written the Reynolds number part specifically.

Which wolfram is taking forever for it solved in that way, but hasn't errored. There it goes, ya it is exactly the same as the others. (1/a)6 = 0 , a = infinity