CrimsonEnvy

I thought the movie was sweet! Mainly because I am a starwars fan, but I think it was better then Episodes 1 and 2. I think the movie was really fast at first, they compressed 30 minutes of information in 10 minutes of film. I think episode 3 could have actually been 2 movies with the amount of information it contained.

It sounds logical to me, but the telescope would take a long long time to get out there. By the time it gets where its going and it sends the pictures back, and thats even if it could take pictures because it is so far out and there are objects such as plants and nebula clouds that the telescope would have to see through in order to see earth.

I agree

I think that they would be benevolent because this sort of thing has kind of all ready happened. There will always be someone who screws it up for everybody else. For example, prohibition, we created a law that people couldnt drink in public. This is from my previous statement that if we created a law that we couldnet travel back in time, like in prohibition ther will always be some people who will try to break the law. I know that people still drank during prohibiton becasue they couldent stop the disease of drinking. It is just an example of how men in the past have broken the law, and I dont think they would stop when something as huge as time travel is invented.

They were just examples to make things easier. I just chose things that impact America because it was the easiest to use.

I think time travel is possible but I dont think we will ever discover it. There are many point to go on, if we ever discover time travel and could actualy do it, someone would have already changed it, wouldent they? Say if someone in the future came back in time, why isnt our society either perfect, or dead? If someone were to come back they could change the slightest thing, and they would probrably be smart (since they just went back in time) they would know what they were doing. If they came back with the intention with stopping a war, they could have stopped the 911 incident, since they would have as much time as they would need to. If they came to start a war they could just have just helped the Cuban Missle Crisis and had someone bomb someone. So either way, they could have either made our society close to perfect, or close to dead, in my opinion. By the way, this is just my idea, i am NOT saying I am right or anything. If any of this dosn't make any sense, or completly wrong tell me where I went wrong so I can understand more. Anyway, I can come up with 3 ligitiment reasons why we never discover time travel. 1) We are destroyed before we can (either by mother nature or each other). 2) Our civilization finally wises up and we become smart (which is highly unlikely). 3) We do figure it out, but our government restricts and outlaws it, but as we all know, there will always be some guy tring to break the law. With that said, he is proprably a criminal, and came back to stop something. For example, he would probrably go back to stop the law from being passed, which if he did, there would be people coming back all the time. This again is just my opinion.

I do not know if this is right, but i was told that we age because oxygen destroys our DNA. I have no clue if this is right or what other people have said in this thread. Thats just what I heard.

I was just wondering, does this equation have anything to do with statistical mechanics?