scallywag007

All I've heard about is a single point. Not what is was made of. It would just stand to reason that in order for matter to win you would need more matter than anti-matter. for that to be guaranteed you would have to start out with a single particle of matter that either explodes under it's own pressure or collides with another particle of matter. I'm not a science major of any sort. Just an armchair theorist that is fascinated by science. The reason I suggested a 2 particle collision is based on the attempts of discovering gravitational waves. A single particle will produce the wave effect that they've been searching for but have been unsuccessful. But a collision would produce a different wave. The angle and force of impact would determine the type of wave produced. With that said it may be nearly impossible to determine the wave shape. Yet the "bang" would still appear to come from a single point. many theories start out with kicking the can. But given enough kicks, it eventually stands upright.

The singularities are made of matter. So you are already up 2 parts matter before the explosion. The resulting explosion would then create further matter and anti-matter. And with anti-matter already at a 2-1 disadvantage, anti-matter loses.

My theory is that the asymmetry could be best explained as TWO infinite points instead of one. Like binary stars spinning around each other getting ever closer until they collide. The two points would collide and explode. Such an explosion would be massive enough to annihilate anything. My theory is that in the explosion, there was more anti-matter destroyed than matter creating the asymmetry and causing matter to be more abundant and creating the universe. This would also allow for the singularity as the Big Bang would still appear to have come from a single point.