EdwinParker

I prefer to say "Timing occurs" rather than "Time exists". I don't really say "Time does not exist". I say instead "The activity of timing occurs, and the term 'time' is simply the abstract noun that refers to the number that we read off our timing device". I understand the activity of timing, as I do it often. I claim that time t is defined as s/v (distance/velocity). Distance and velocity don't need definitions because we can look and see greater and smaller distances and objects moving at faster and slower velocities. BTW, the math works out just as fine with definition t=s/v as it does with alleged definition v=s/t, since they are mathematically equivalent.

https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-09/book-excerpt-there-no-such-thing-time I was kicked out of a physics forum for saying what this Popular Science article says. I said time does not exist, only the human act of timing. All that exists are matter and energy moving faster or slower relative to one another. The moderator argued with me and got meaner and meaner and finally kicked me out.