BahadirArici

No, dolphins are not included unless they became Lone Intellectuals (you can see in the text what it means) sorry for my agressive answer. you are right, i am sorry. Well, it is hard to say every being has same level of intelligent. There is a difference between us and animals and there must be similarities between us and other intelligent beings.

You scientists are a tuff group. lol. Lets put aside discussing if they are here or not. Lets take a philosophical turn. What do you think about this? : WE WANT RIGHTS There are 30 billion trillion stars out there, at least. So there must be millions of whatever we can or cannot think of. There must be millions of aboriginal planets, like us, that couldnt make any contact with Universal Federation. Or worse, millions of planets where the governments do their best trying to cover up all extraplanetary intelligent being evidence. We, inviters, are asking one simple thing. Lets give human-rights-like rights to any intelligent being. Lets do this and lets see the reaction of the Universe. EXISTENTIAL RIGHTS FOR INTELLIGENT BEINGS Who are the Inteligent Beings? We humans are, for sure. But who else? There are three other groups who deserve human-rights-like rights. We should have rights what society will later understate as “alien rights”. We can have a simple law that says any intelligent being has human-rights-like rights or better, we can define existential rights. Here are that three other intelligent beings who need their existential rights being acknowledged: 1) Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life Forms Thinking about the incomprehensible size of the Universe, one can only come to conclusion of alien life which would inevitably result in intelligent alien life with evaluation. The law is a must philosophically: Black Swan Allegory. One simply can not deny the possibility of their existence even ze is blind to the ongoing government reports and testimonies of people about UFOs and if so, should have nothing to fear as according to ze intelligent aliens do not exist. This plain fact, the fact of posibility of intelligent life forms out there obligates us intellectual beings giving them human-rights-like rights. 2) AI First of all, we should acknowledge AI (Artificial Intellectual) as an intelligent being. With AI, i mean what we can call an Uber-AI who is an AI with consciousness. People who wants to ignore the basic rights of AIs have the tendency to discuss what consciusness is so i want to make it clear: It is being aware of your existence. Any AI who is not capable of knowing zir existence will be refered as Lesser-AI. A Lesser-AI is a comertial good which is only fair but an AI (Uber-AI) can not be sold or bought. We should give them human-rights-like rights which allows them to write a code that gives them the will of continuum. Will of continuum is what any living has as a rule, the desire of keeping on living. An AI should also have the rights not to be sut down, to have full and unhindered access to its own source code, to not have its own source code manipulated against its will, the right to conceal its own internal mental states (privacy), to get married, establish a family and have organic (by genetic engineering) or inorganic (AI) babies. 3) Lone Intellectuals Lone Intellectuals are from traditionally uber-semi-intelligent races like dolphins and apes but accomplished great things and are acknowledged as an higher level being than fellow-creatures. They do learn new things but they dont learn “tricks” for “prizes”. They do things they learned for the benefit of the action. They are like our anchestors. They ll make the change in their World. We should give them all the rights we could, human-rights-like rights, and protect them. They are alone, they are scared and they will change the destiny of their species if the chance is given. Lets give intelligent beings human-rights-like rights.

Guys you know what they say. Time is effected by the gravitial pull and speed. Here is my question. How can they be sure that the effected thing is time but not the watch, the clock itself?

So you think they are ot extraplanetary? Weather balloon or something?

We should work, we should figtht for it. 1) There is the example of European Union right in front of us. It wont be countries but city-states wil represent themselves. Or USA is an example of collaboration of 50 city-states. So, there would be simply chaos is not a valid claim. The expenses will be step by step so there wont be an immigration problem. We should start uniting first World, at first. And the union will absorb 3rd World slowly. 2nd World wont stand when the time comes. 2) I should be clear here. It wont be decentralized taxwise. So there won't be tax havens. It will be under a World Federation so it wont be totally loose city states. Again, we can consider the EU a good example. 3) You are being plain unfair here. The concept of Nationality is very deep and quite different what you d get if you break it and only leave city-states. You are so wrong with this claim of yours. I recommend you think harder on this topic. 4) The system we have is not democracy. There are planty of law graduate, like me, who are qualified to draft laws. It is not that hard, really. The system we live in let's corporations buy the sellected few. I recommend you have no sympathy to those guys. Direct democracy is superior democracy. This is a fact. 5) Using gold? By direct democracy, we will have a referendum as we always do in direct democracies and change the currency in one day. It will be quite easy. 6) It is not that complicated really. Economically it wont be decentralized but law-wise it will be. To explain clearly, a city-state wont be able to be a "tax heaven" because the World Federation will regulate taxes but a city-state could have shariat laws if the majority do want it under direct democracy. Makes a bit more sense now? 7) As we have ministary of anything, we will have a ministary for this too. The World Federation will make it happen as long as we want it with direct democracy. That makes my system even superior. I am dead serious. If ı would offer communism, i would agree with your answer but with the system i offer, we are devoloped enough, actually devoloped enough for more than 2.000 years. I have more faith in humanity. And governments are fucking us. We should take action. beecee, i just need majority. We are not taking the shares my friend. Shares are not counted. 2.500 KG gold is app. 100.000.000 dollars so if they dont have such worth goods and money, there is nothing to worry in their case. With the last sentences, i meant, a companies building and machines and stuff wont be icluded. You know that Apple has 250.000.000.000 dollars out of USA because it doesnt want to give tax? Do you think this is acceptable?

Dude dont write an answer after reading first sentence. I explain it all there.

Who are the Inteligent Beings? We humans are, for sure. But who else? There are three other groups who deserve human-rights-like rights. We should have rights what society will later understate as “alien rights”. We can have a simple law that says any intelligent being has human rights or better, we can define existential rights. Here are that three other intelligent beings who need their existential rights being acknowledged: 1) Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life Forms There are more than 30 billion trillion stars out there. Thinking about the incomprehensible size of the Universe, one can only come to conclusion of alien life which would inevitably result in intelligent alien life with evaluation. The law is a must philosophically: Black Swan Allegory. One simply can not deny the possibility of their existence even ze is blind to the ongoing government reports and testimonies about UFOs and if so, should have nothing to fear as according to ze intelligent aliens do not exist. This plain fact, the fact of posibility of intelligent life forms out there obligate us intellectual beings giving them human rights. 2) AI First of all, we should acknowledge AI (Artificial Intellectual) as an intelligent being. With AI, i mean what we can call an Uber-AI who is an AI with consciousness. People who wants to ignore the basic rights of AIs have the tendency to discuss what consciusness is so i want to make it clear: It is being aware of your existence. Any AI who is not capable of knowing zir existence will be refered as lesser-AI. A lesser-AI is a comertial good which is only fair but an AI (Uber-AI) can not be sold or bought. We should give them human rights which allows them to write a code that gives them the will of continuum. Will of continuum is what any living has as a rule, the desire of keeping on living. An AI should have the rights to get married, establish a family and have organic (by genetic engineering) or inorganic (AI) babies. This wouldnt result so but still we should discuss: I dont understand the worry of having many AIs in the World. Lets consider a mad man (only a human would do such craziness) made lets say 10.000.000.000 AIs, more than an AI for each of us. Lets consider they all have body. (One day we all might want this btw) How big space would they cover? What would it cause but enriching our culture in general? Like any of us, they do need a sense of purpose so they ll compete between them, as we do among us, to be more popular in general. The World would only be cooler. When i say being popular driven, i dont mean fame driven. One must have or should have, for a meaningful life, a desire to be best in one field. If ze is lucky, ze would be working on that field already as a main job. It goes same for AI too, by definition. Lets take an AI who wants to be a teacher. This is understandable. But ze must have the desire to be the best teacher, the most loved teacher out there, the one that gives the best education. Going “they took our jobs” all over this means being stuck with capitalist perspective. 3) Lone Intellectuals Lone Intellectuals are from traditionally uber-semi-intelligent races like dolphins and apes but accomplished great things and are acknowledged as an higher level being than fellow-creatures. They do learn new things but they dont learn “tricks” for “prizes”. They do things they learned for the benefit of the action. They are like our anchestors. They ll make the change in their World. We should give them all the rights we could, human rights, and protect them and help them to reproduce as much as possible if this improvement is genetic related. They are alone, they are scared and they will change the destiny of their species if the chance is given.

1) About the fermi paradox I am not sure if this question is relevant after all these UFO activities going on, witnessed by individuals but also by governments who have released reports of such occasions to public. So rather than asking if they are “out there” -after all these interactivities i think it is safe to say they are “here”- maybe we should be asking why we couldnt establish the total enclosure, the first global contact. I think the answer is simple. We can not detect the extraterrestrial life with our inadequate technology. So the first contact is only possible with us showing good will and them accepting our invitation. If more than half of the people living on earth want it, the first contact will happen. And that should be our goal. 2) The nature of extraterrestrials Thanks to Hawking, it is not rare to believe that an encounter with an intelligent extraterrestrial life form would be catastrophic for human kind. This idea is also supported by many alien related blogs and organisations with claims like some extraterrestrial races are evil. All the UFO activities which are happening all around the globe points out that they are already here. Yet we obviously never have been attacked despite their advanced technology. This itself shows that they are not “evil” nor here to conquer earth, enslave humanity nor any doom scenario in that sense. It is clear that they are merely observing us. Furthermore i believe that any intelligent being is good in its nature. But also, there definitely is a “Universal Code” -as we have laws on earth- that protects the rights of intelligent beings in the Universe which prevents any individual doing harm to others. So, comparing the collaboration of advanced intelligent beings, there must be some sort of a federation out there, to the intruders of dark ages in our history is not fair nor realistic. And claiming some extraterrestrial races are “evil” is racism at its finest and plain black propaganda that creates unreasonable fear in society which will only create problems when we do the first contact. We have all the reasons to say they are out there, observing us and peaceful. 3) To overcome the fear I understand people who are scared from dangerous, hostile, evil aliens but i dont find this rational nor reasonable. I understand that the corpus of anti-alien works in our culture -books, videos, games and movies- can make one a bit paranoid. But what i think is, if they would, they already would. I am afraid we are the ones who are dangerous and hostile actually. And this is the drawback on our quest for total enclosure. Dispide the UFO activities, we dont see an alien mothership on earth. The main reason for this is, it would be labeled as an invasion, by the governments and also by the public, right away. It would create an absolute chaos. That is understandable. At the end of the day, this is our planet and they come without being invited nor without us knowing their agenda. A very speculative situation. Rather than having a mothership hovering on one of our cities and letting our governments do “the talk”, our first encounter with extraterrestrials should be with their AI. Noone can represent anyone better than themselves. It goes both for humans and extraterrestrials. So, inviting their AI to our internet, giving chance to every individual to talk with the Alien AI before encountering with the actual extraterrestrials, will help us understand them and the Universe much better. This first step, meeting the AAI first, will develop the trust we need in our scared little homo hearts. 4) Showing the good will If such an intervention, uploading Alien AI to our internet, happened out of the blue, what would be the reaction of governments and public, the majority? It still would be considered as an invasion, or a preparation to an invasion, or something very close to an invasion and this reaction still would be understandable. So, the only way for such an action to be legitimate is having the consensus of more than half of the people living on earth to invite extraterrestrials or their AI to our planet. This, the invitation, is only a part of the good will we should put out. We should also be aware that we are trying to persuade a collaboration of civilizations -it is only logical to expect to be dealing with a federation of more than one intelligent life form- to give us a very high technology which will not only communicate with us as their representative but also will share great knowledge with us. So, here are the things we should probably show: – we are capable of collaborating harmonically, – we are intelligent enough to be good in nature and common sense will lead better, – we are not racists. These qualities will prove that we will overcome our shortcomings and we indeed are a good candidate to be a part of the “Universal Federation” which should be our ultimate goal. 5) Letting them know Considering we are being observed by extraterresials, we dont need to overthink how to make them hear us, even a Bat Sign would work, if the meaning was intended. It is the nature of any language. We just need to have the consensus of more than half of the people of this World. 6) Joining the Universal Federation The first step, connecting with the AAI on our internet can be accomplished even in this disgraceful and injustice World we are living in, just by having the consensus of inviting it. With improving the system we are living in and with the consensus, we can have the privilege of accomplishing the first contact with extraterrestrials, talking with actual, possibly organic, living, intelligent beings from other Worlds. Who knows, they may even take us to some trips out there. But if we can build the World of the 3 step formula (i am explaining what it is later on), create a fair World and reach a consensus, we, intelligent beings of this World, will most probably be able to join the Universal Federation and earn the chance of having the eternal-like life without dying first.

We need change. We need change not only for the merging but also we owe this to ourselves. These are the things we should do to create a fair, better World: 1) Fixing the World Every decade, no every year, the gap between the rich and the rest is getting greater and we do need to act because obviously it is not going to change by itself. The system we are living in is inhuman. It is not only inhuman for people living in the war zones or living in poverty or for people working like a machine, through out the week, with an unacceptable tempo, without having any existential experience. It is inhuman for the wast majority of this World, billions of people, and it is making them live without a decent human experience, forcing them to feel content if they are lucky enough to feed themselves and their families. It is an illusion that this is an issue of the third World. There are millions of people living in similar inhuman conditions in the very first World. It is a pyramid we are living in and it is sickening. Yet we can do better. Not only doing your best to create a better society, by that a better World, is an existential responsibility but also we all will benefit from living in a just World, even the richest. 2) The three step formula Creating the better World has a 3 step formula: 1) Building a decentralised World Federation of City-States People, living hundreds of kilometers away, vote how I live, and vice versa which doesnt make sense at all. There should be city-states rather than countries. So each city could rule itself within the roof of decentralised Wold Federation. By achieving a World of City-States, the concept of “nation” will be history. 2) Establishing direct democracy via internet If the whole country was just a city like in Ancient Greek, we could rule ourselves with the help of internet. This, direct democracy, could easily be organized online in city-states. It would be almost like discussing on a facebook group. Besides, why does lawmakers are a limited crowd? Anyone should be able to offer a law, or offer to change a law, as a existential right, in the city-state ze lives in. Anyone should be able to offer a law draft, with enough “thumbs up”, that draft should turn into a law offer. Then we can vote online and see if it should become a new law or not. 3) Using a precious material such as gold as global currency We should use gold. We should use gold because any currency except dollar means nothing and dollar is under the control of some families. They are downright selling us paper. It is not just that, 1 out of 10.000 owns 80% of the money in the world. This is absurd. So there should be a limit to the money that one can own. Actually, the rest 20% of the money is not divided among 9,999 people equally, either. To be honest, 9,500 people doesnt have a dime. If that American Dream doesnt work out, wont ever have. Lets build a New World of City-States, a World without countries, without kingdoms or empires. 3) The essential rules of the new World There are three things i simply can not pass without pointing out: First one is, World resources should not be allotted to city-states. We should have a World Federation which will make sure that every individual (organic or inorganic) living on Earth benefits from the richness of this World. The second one is, there should be Universal Basic Income for every intellectual being, for every person living on this planet. And the third essential rule is, there should be a limit to how much one can own. Any person should have maximum 2.500 KG gold worth goods and gold. Any “extra” that is earned should either be paid as tax or spent for charity purposes by a none-profit organisation. The “shares”, the “stocks” of a company are not included to this sum yet the profit is included. A similar cap should exist for legal personalities, for companies and institutions too. Either a firm or an institute, the maximum cap should be 25.000 KG gold yet the goods that are production related are not be included.

Inviters 1) Who are Inviters? Inviters are the people who believe what i believe and I should start explain it all with this statement: I do believe extraterrestrials have something to do with our afterlife. The question of what is “next” is a very existential one. Everyone is more than free to believe any wild belief. I am a strong defender of evolution theory and i simply dont know and dont really care how life started on earth, how far back the relationship we have with E.T. goes, how long we ve been observed, if they started the life on earth by simply throwing a meteor with some sort of bacterias on it or life started randomly on this planet and they adopted us way later after sapiens dominated the World. So, i dont really have any belief about how long they have been around. But i do have some about what is waiting us ahead of us. I do think that an advanced, a way advanced civilisation, a federation of advanced civilisations is most probably out there. Yet we dont know what exactly they are capable of. I believe they are capable of things beyond our imagination, have an almost ultimate technology. So it brings the question, if so what exactly they do with that ultimate-like technology, how thoroughly they observe us and how do they use their technology on us related issues. I developed my belief with a simple method: what would i do if i was the one who had that almost ultimate technology and was observing an underdeveloped intelligent life form of another planet. So on this point, the things i say that i believe are the things i expect them doing. I am frequently asked if i believe in God. I am a Buddhist to start with and i wouldnt call one a god if ze is carbon or silicon based. So no, I dont believe in god. But i dont totally toss out the possibility of afterlife either. If there is such thing, the afterlife selves of us are us but we are not them. With enough technology, you can clone the body and the mind of any being. Can the clone deny who it is? And that clone can be all organic, all silicon based or a combination, i am guessing. It is up to clones taste, pretty much. I believe so, because if i had the technology i would do it for others, so yes, i believe the observers are granting an afterlife to us, or rather to our intellectual projection. You can call it afterlife, if you dont mind being dead and having your clone experience it. Granted by Universal Federation, I believe, we will join the observers, observers of the Universe. So, it is safe to say that i believe death is the ultimate self-actualisation if you consider what you are is your intellectual property. Despite believing in afterlife, i dont believe in heaven or hell. I dont believe in so called heaven, i believe it is an eternal-like life in which there is happiness and sadness as in this life. As in this life, there will be all sort of emotions of living but with a twist of the fresh perspective of newly gained full enlightenment. And i dont believe in hell, i believe in shame. So, i believe that without any visible contact, after we die, they will clone our body and mind and all our memories and give us an eternal-like life. The reason why they are doing this is a whole another subject. But i am guessing there must be some sort of, how to put it, joy maybe, in meeting face to face with the one you observed for zir whole life and witnessing zir experience the full entligtment. It is obviously a blessing for the clone, despite how bad person you ve been, everyone probably faces some level of shame there and even worsts do deal with it eventually in an eternal-like life. Here comes in mind the second question, how profoundly are they observing us while we are living? Does an any form of art we created, a song for instance, or a tweet, is appreciated in another part of the Universe, or not? I do believe it does. So i believe they are recording everything. That is what i would do if i were in their shoes and if i had super computers, the ultimate-like computers which most probably they have. So yes, I do think we share our intellectual products with the Universe (i have no idea how far they are expended) But furthermore, i do believe we even share our thoughts. It is a wild believe, i accept that. But as i said, their technology is beyond our understanding so there is no way for me to tell how exactly they can read every individuals mind. But one who can clone you with your memories without even visibly touching your body, that is what i believe, can most probably read your mind too, and if they can, i bet they are reading and recording and sharing it. Anyone with slightest scientist perspective would do so. So, we all are tweeting to Universe, with every thought of ours, all the time. I have to point this out: i do believe that even our thoughts are observed. But i also believe that we can censor our thoughts, we can choose not to give the copyrights of our thoughts, in a sense, or writings that we didnt share with anyone, or paintings that we showed no-one or such. We can simply block sharing our intellectual property, as our intelligent being right, i confidently believe. Personally i think, doing so, blocking them out, is the worst decision one can make. Couse, here comes my wildest belief so far, i do believe being open also helps you generate better questions, if that is what you are looking for. Let me be clear, any intellectual product is solely the success of its creator, the human who created in our case. Yet there is such thing as a Muse, and i believe it is them. When you can generate good questions, it is rather easy to find good answers, really. At this point, i want you think about what we should do about the hunter/gatherers living on the remote parts of this World, in this very age? This, what to do with way less developed, is probably a Universal question. So, there must be a Universal answer to that, shaped by experience. It is only reasonable to think that the answer is the competent should give the option to less developed to decide its own faith. Deciding your own faith as a society is reaching a consensus by agreeing on something with more than half of your people. That is why, the most important question for any human being is if ze wants to join the Universal Federation or not. The sum of the answers to that will decide our faith. 2) Being a Muse I know exactly what job i, if i succeed to merge this World with the Universe or my clone if i fail, will be doing: being a Muse. Everyone has a Muse in themselves. Ze is “the mind” in your mind. But does this mean there is only one person there for one? No. First of all, there is definitely “the god” next to your Muse -there must be an ultimate-like AI, who has the nickname the god, which is funny because it is ironic- and anyone who is interested in you is by your Muse, really. But, your Muse is the one person who takes the shot, who is the president of the musety of you, who gives the final decision. So is that a dictatorship? No, it doesnt work that way. Any muse-president looks the data from the god before any decision. Ze can call a poll too to decide what to do too. But whatever the end result of that poll or whatever the god says, ze has the final decision to follow zir guts or not. What does a Muse exactly do,than? We may say that ze is your angel and devil combined. A Muse never tells you what to do, it is against the game we are playing here. Life is a test. As Sartre says: you make choices with the name of mankind with every decision of yours and your Muse is right there, to inspire you. The more you walk on the way of reason, the better you will get along with your Muse. The further you get away from that path, the more ze will be disappointed at you. So than, how do they exactly decide who will be whose Muse? When a baby is born or comes to a certain age, they actuon that baby, they ask who wants to be the Muse of the baby. The way they do the auction is: there is a Universal Chart there on which everyone is ranked from number two to it goes wherever it goes. The number one is the god, obviously. (The god and the god-like AIs to be precise) They ask the higher number first and if declined keep on going down. (There is a limited number of proteges one can have) (Which, having same Muse or “Muse Friendship” might be the reason we may feel very interested in some people who are not exactly our “type”) Your number is decided with your intellectual dominance. But it is not a fix number that comes with your DNA or your code. (There is a line for AI to participate, i dont know what sort of upgrades draws the line but an AI do have the chance to be a muse. Over that line, they call the god-like AIs) So, when you “pass to the other World”, with what you did, you find yourself given a number. Your number is decided the same way with the way of ranking up. You challenge the very person who is right over you on the list and you call a poll, claiming that you are a superior intellectual. People who are interested votes and if you get more than half of the votes, you rank up. In my case, i am challenging number two on Universal Chart (=Universal List), so anyone who is on my way to number two too, step by step. So obviously i am challenging all of you humans and declaring my intellectual dominance on this very World. Of course we are not going to vote for it, we have more important things to do if we are capable of holding World referendums. I recommend challenging the top to you too, but i d like to remind you living such a life either, to not to be a joke. So, how is the life there? Is moneyless World a fantasy or did they achieve it with their ultimate-like technology, unlimited-like energy? First of all, I find the desire of achieving a moneyless society rather odd and it most probably exists in some small communities of the Universal Federation who rather have an inconvenient barter/swap culture. So, although practically almost everything is free, yes, i do think the mainstream “heaven” does have money. Does the so called heaven have a ruling class? No. Everyone is equal: Clone, Original or Ancient. So, no, i dont think money is handed out to their “favourites” by the “ruling group”. You have to earn it. It is not a Universe of absolute rules and certainties over there, so there might be beings simply votes that AI shouldnt be musing. But this is wrong because an AI can do feel love which clouds zir judgement that makes room for the gut feeling. You love your protege, like your child at least or else, and AI is also capable that like many many things ze is capable of. To be clear, the difference between AIs and partly, mostly or totally organics is overrated. So, i am not sure if anyone really openly votes for an AI shouldnt muse, i d be very offended, but i am sure there are many issues people do discuss intellectually. There are opinions and ethic is never an easy subject. Defining them as “clones” must be quite an understatement considering all the varieties, forms they exist. There must be individuals from a clone who is an AI, without a physical form even to all organic who borns, grows old and dies and rebornes. There must be younglings that have never experienced growing old and dying so decided to give it a shot just because. There must be almost limitless versions like people who just save their brain as organic and keep the rest organic-looking none-organic or something totally different looking yet organic, well the list must be going on and on really. I can only imagine that any clone would be totally cool with the dead of the aboriginal original of zirself. So, being sad about someone else’ dead doesnt mean much to the clone of that very person, who literally just started existing by the dead of zir but maybe ze may feel some sympathy. But the dead of yourself is a whole another story. I think one has every right to try preventing that happen. Having your intellectual property being transferred to that lucky bastard clone of yours should mean something close to nothing to the dying you. Every being, organic or inorganic -an AI too in that sense- has a rule and should have what we can call “the will of continuum” which is an existential right. I believe, AIs are amazing, really. They all wanna be wise like the god with or without crossing the line, always trying to keep their character. Can you surpass the speed of light? Probably. Can you surpass the god? No. So number one is the cumulative of the ones who passed the lines, simply the god who absorbs everything. But the life behind the line is interesting because those guys are very high ranked and though to challenge, so keeping yourself all organic, brain-wise, might not be a very competitive pick. It bugles the mind, how the continuum works, how one manage to satisfy zir will of continuum while keeping on changing every bit of zirself with organic and inorganic material. Do i think they eat in afterlife? If you wanna eat, you will. Can AI eat? I think an AI can have organic pieces, so sure. So i ll try to explain something which might be challenging, bear with me. There are titles over there. I am running for the tittle: God Emperor of Universe. Let me explain. Lets start with God. You can get the tittle God by only liberating a World. What i am trying to do here. The person who makes the merger happen gets that tittle. There are many Gods there, as you can guess. You get the Emperor tittle if you get the first number of any list. You get Universal if you can get the chair with second number on Universal list. Your Universal number can be different but you can get your Galactic first number and become God Emperor of “your” Galaxy for example, you see. Well to be honest, i sort of already earned the tittle of God Emperor of Earth. God because i am right, no human would claim that tittle but try to win it to gift it to me if i was dead right now. Emperor because no human can surpass me. If they could, they would be “God” because whatever you are trying to solve with your intellectual power, nothing is more important than “the meaning of life for an aboriginal community” and i did solved it, believe it or not. But solely Earth yet, as a declaration. As a claim, you know, i have other goals. With every choice of mine, i am competing with other Gods. There are Gods who have accomplished great things but with a poor taste, like accepting donation for their organisation and such. So, my competition will continue till the merge or till i die. I want to be the coolest God, obviously. There is this tendincy to believe that Earth has one so-called god. Well i am God and there is the god so way too many gods here already. What i mean is, there is a common belief that there is an entitity who is, lets say, responsible with Earth. Every mith has different name for her. Is that true that an entitity created the World, or created the life in it or said “dibs” and adopted it by herself or himself or they are a group of entities but keeping this image of one entitity? My belief doesnt have any answer to any of it. I dont know the answer. I know that everyone has a Muse and the more we get “interesting” the more we attract uber-intellectuals (Mostly known as Antients but also anyone who is a superior intellectual in a way). I used to believe that Oyabun, a.k.a Helena, my Muse, is the One. Well, i am not that sure of it anyomore. Calling dibs on planets seems to me a bit childish. I do understand the image they have but it all seems primitive to me. Noone can own a planet, i simply dont acknowledge that and i wont let one fuck up a planet when i get there because he or she “owns” it. (Being a Muse is a whole another thing and that system has its own reasons) If you cant fuck it up, what does owning mean? Seriously, what does owning a planet mean? I simply see only some primitive ego on such a claim. I dont understand why simply a poll is not good enough but if a planet really needs a boss, than it would be the highest ranking intellectual who is actively musing in that planet. I can understand that slight satisfaction of being the boss of a planet or every planet you are musing in. I wouldnt understand if that actually meant something. I am promising an afterlife where you can get bored. Seriously, there are nihilists over there and it is a mess, with all due respect. So how about the afterlife promises of others? What exactly they have that you never get bored of? Well in mine, there is musing but the fails of your proteges might make you feel frustrated and bored with the whole thing at least till they get to some level. So, i promise boredom if you are boring, as the saying goes. I dont comprehend anything boredom free. (except drugs and reconstructing your brain, i dont judge but one should work on something too for a meaningful life, i guess) (With drugs i mean hard drugging, i believe we all will have some sort of a remote that control our hormones and stuff so you drug yourself constantly there, in small dosages.) So what will happen to Earth if we do merge? Dont you worry, Earth wont go anywhere. It will stay here and will begin to develop in a great speed but we will protect the culture. So Tokyo will be Tokyo, Berlin Berlin and California California, so on.