Lasse

We need a digial reality where the storage is shared (the cloud) What if this equation will be his only knowledge and the only thing he can explain and know that it is for sure true.

You look it from the wrong point of view. More believer more support for research and task execution. Science has already a strong philosophy. So easy to understand. It would not be easy to corrupt it, specially if there are few billion interested eyes looking for clear information. To jump back to the original topic: Finally I understood The God of Science, The only supernatural state possible to exist, the source code of the Universe: The state of physically Nothing: 0 Task completed. Final question of life answered. Science and Religion lived happy ever after...

Sorry did not ment to. Try to understand space as I see the op too. Can not the discussion flow for the weaker ones as well? I am interested in the question. I just drop the question I do not want to hijack if this counts like that. The opening question seemed to be about.

I got a bit confused maybe but currently I see time as a linear information about how big is space (end everything in it) I would say that space(time) is evolving with a certain rate since the first moment of existence. My recognition is that as big spacetime is as many energy and matter is present in it. Where from the balance otherwise? Sorry did not ment to. Try to understand space as I see the op too. Can not the discussion flow for the weaker ones as well? I am interested in the question.

Can there be a correlation between how big space is, and how much energy and matter is there in the system? Could space have weight?

Nothing can exist outside the Laws of Nature. God may could be the laws of nature itself without any higher level of presentation but that beyond the laws of nature.... that seems impossible. How could I call an advanced immortal conscious intelligence?

I mean since it is predetermined in the moment of observation (the fact that reality is there) makes the system predictable.

How could anything be outside Nature (if any God could exist)? Any of them could exist without space? Space is part of Nature. The image of God in humans mind evolves as one senses what is plausable eventually with technologically in our future. The wonderings will never give a perfect answer so they can not be evidence. You can not blame humans to think about it when it is in our culture (can the kid see something in tv without the intensive "promotion" of technology...) Science is a tool for Understanding Nature. Science has tools for measuring nature. Religion is part of Nature. Science has no tools (yet) to measure Religion related information. i.e: religions are not (yet) science. I wonder if we could meet God (any form of advanced intelligence) would that not falsify basically everything in the religions while would prove only one thing, the existence of higher intelligences. Would such senario change the perception of science for the masses looking for evidence about god in religions. Mixing religion with science is like to recognize that there is a informational connection between a stone age bow and the falcon heavy. Not to mention: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifical_Academy_of_Sciences Which does not really change the rate of analogy in my metaphore... Could you detail this thought? How could I imagine something outside nature? Do you have some evidence? 50 years ago we did not see planets around distant stars. Still that did not place plausable planets outside nature.

Very funny, we did not hear it yet. This is one strange sentence Strange. I know it is not easy to read me but it can not be this difficult. I am sorry for my unclearity.

Have wondered as well. The humanoid form would not fit. I would think about God as S/He would be more like an Energy with conciousness, with an absolute acess to information, with the potential of materialisation without loss of information. It always could sustain the conciouss energy what One could be. That would be supernatural for me. I am pretty sure reality has much more what we do not know. I would not exclude the potential of humanoid transformation. Who would wanna anyway come here, we stick Jesus to the cross last time (if He was real).

Előre meghatározott. Seems to be what I mean... Reality is there, the past (with all it's energy, matter and spacetime) is a fundamental determination how the next second of reality with a 99.9999% posibility(probability?) will be executed. Intelligence, information is the 0.00000..01% of impact. It is present. One could call it consciousness. Our impact and relevans is related to our understanding about the physical reality. We have to count with every part of it...

S/he

I am sad about my relative simplicity, I would like to understand more... I learn with every moment, that makes me more. (or I like to think)

Sadly looks like the second...

Time is a basic information about Space. Time says since when Space is existing and we can approximate their size and length from the information we get out from reality. They are fundamentally interconnected. Everything(energy and matter) exist in space -time

True

"So it isn't predetermined"-Strange. Deny please than the existence of Reality if you think it is not here as a pre-determining physical base for the future.

This would be correct like this: We can change the future because we have free will and so the future is not determined. Everything what you can perceive is here. It IS predetermined. Reality is here. Maybe You are trolling

That should never happen. We are smarter than that. If you would recognize I am the only one never offends. I meant the example. You just wrote it when I was thinking about it

I can not cite but took an example. You can not cite the theory of everything since it is not yet discovered but that does not mean that something would not work based on that... Very good example! This seems to be predetermined for Humans. That the physical Reality has a unique set of existence presented through energy and matter in space (time). I think we can impact it's present but we can not impact its past. We have impacts on it's future. The recognition and the thought is part of the continuum (i.e it takes time to think through something). We use to arrive to a conclusion. What is your recognition? Own words please. No wiki. Why? Now it's changing. The past is done. The future is predetermined by the present reality and subject to change.

Someone is pregnant and it is predetermined she will give birth in the future. The when, will depend from the impacts during the pregnancy i.e stress will make it happen earlier than it should

Exactly on this I said it is not seems to be just black or white, i.e even it is predetermined by the past can be impected in the present and by that alter the future outcome

I perceive that reality is determined until the present time (predetermined, fixed) and has the potential to be impacted in the present moment (not absolutely! Predetermined) I can not cite. I can give an example: Nuclear warheads predetermined to be used in conflict. President Trump has the power to ignite it any time, he still has the limited freedom of choice to use it and when to use it, impected by political, economical, cultural, moral, ethical aspects of reality.

The future can not be absolutely fixed. We have impact in the present time. The future is plastic in the present time.

That makes absolutely no sense. What are you talking about? So i mean what I wrote previously. The fact that something is there (predetermined) does not mean we can not impact* the course of action. *which is the part you perceived as: not determined at all.