inSe

Say, "I am a bot" The one on Google can be sarcastic too. If you can write a post that says "I am a bot". With nothing more and nothing less, than I'll believe you're not a bot. But if you are, on a site like this, youd be programmed to shut down ideas and I routinely see attacks against anything ftl related here, not just from these two accounts, but specifically from members of authority. They wouldn't program bots with that purpose to have any possible reply that openly admits its a bot.

Both of their posts were within a very short interval of time. The sequence is the same, Koti posted and then Strange posted, and that has persisted in the same order. When they responded to one unedited post in that response time their responses were virtually identical. When they responded to a post that was edited in that response time, their responses were both in regards to me saying their usernames with a comeback but much different. That's bot behavior. Automated replies. Based on personality algorithms.

In this model, space, time AND matter AND energy are one continuum. So as time contracts c speeds up. As time dilates c slows down. For an observer of dilated or contracted time it seems the same. But I explained in the OP how unruh radiation in the form of gravitons can causally bridge that gap between like observers. The redirection of photons is what shortens the wavelength in what Swanson referred to as "inelastic scattering" really that's just increased mass aka decreased volume in the photon particle aether here. Which is what creates heavier particles. I'm repeating myself, all of this was in the OP with equations that match LCDM data I'm pretty sure Strange & Koti are bot accounts. Same person made both accounts. They've failed my Turing test.

That's exactly what I just said. Because of the effects of time dilation they're the same. I used c lower case many times. I know this. Also said it was the same if two observers are different sizes and experience time differently. If they experience time the same than over a larger distance it slows down or speeds over a smaller distance relative to our perception of time. Not all interactions here experience a uniform perception of time. Expansion and spook action causally BRIDGE bodies that are in motion with radically different relative time-frames via unruh radiation. That's why the transmissions Einstein received were originally deemed UFOBs. Unified field oscillation BRIDGE. Energy from the virtual states were why Tesla's electromganetic levitating saucers didn't need to recharge.

The granular coordinate system made from this geometric process forms a unified field, that is, an aether that waves through all particles. Unlike observable or experimentally measurable fields in mainstream affine gauge theories, this aether field coordinate system remains three dimensional beneath the Planck length where additional energy can be stored, masquerading as virtual particle states. This geometric process built upon iterations of a Koch snowflake can be graphed & carried out for an angstrom divided by a Planck length of iterations by exascale computers, or memristers if you don't wish to waste enormous amounts of energy on these micro world sheets. This aether field should produce particles whose trajectories match that of those randomly generated by any modern mainstream field theory only these will be sphere-like particles in which the aether waves, with this aether being a scattering of these particles mirroring the virtual particle state. Tesla's model of gravity adds energy, as does other models of gravitational electromagnetism, and sonoluminousense. This one defines the underlying mechanisms. Replace the words time dilation with time contraction, and vice versa. The speed of light slows by the rate at which time contracts, and speeds up by the at which it dilates ratrate

These world sheets could be simulations run by matrioshka brains to find the real universe as it is for interstellar spook action signalling (because in this theory it is possible to tell how observing one particle will effect all entangled particles between, say, a star system in Andromeda & earth's). Which our satellites might pick up as intelligible transmissions that use Unified Field Oscillations. However these Koch snowflake based world sheets are taken from the base of the cones of the triangles to find the circumference of the deleterious spheres of the granule coordinates, these Koch snowflakes would be based of an infinitely many different variations in angles of isosceles triangles, with each iteration being statistically randomized (50-50% chance) in deciding whether the next iteration will point the newly formed isosceles triangle inward or outward. Eventually you will get the real universe within the operations before the world sheets consume themselves.

Thats according to a certain interpretation. Over a dozen physicists attempted to contradict bells theorem in that regard in my OP. I'm working on mathematically disproving bells theorem for a return to Einstein's principle of locality under ops interpretation. A lot of that involves the sphere-like sub-planck scale particles in the geodesic I described in the previous page. The issue is computing power, the interpretation uses too many operations to construct the graphical branar geometry using those sphere-like granule coordinates. So I need to learn how to condense that geometry in the previous page into a simplified equation that successfully falsifies Bell's theorem in regards to non-local particle states.

Entangled state particle

It says a lot about quantum computing. Because they were "able to address and read out every single quantum bit individually" which is the whole point behind why ESP signaling is thought to be impossible because it supposedly can't be read/measured out without changing the whole system effecting entangled states. This WAS accomplished in the lab only less than month for only 20 atoms after almost 100 years of knowing about the phenomenon. The fact that they can measure ESP throughout this line of 20 atoms without altering the ESP which had been measured fits with what I said ESP is. Which is the collective gws of of electrons with a perpendicular trajectory (like a cross) passing through that string of 20 atoms with the velocity at which gws propagate (micro c) plus the velocity of an electron (c/600 something) multiplied by distance divided by the dilation of time as space covered by collective gws increases. The actual equation is in my OP and does yield a velocity within 4 orders of magnitude greater than speed of light, which fits with measurent of ESP s velocity

"Wavelength depends on the medium (for example, vacuum, air, or water) " -wavelength /wiki/ That is what redirecting photons does, it shortens their wavelengths. You didn't know that? A: Expansion is occurring faster now and no light in Earth's atmosphere is being redshifted B: Earth's atmosphere interrupts the photon paths to alter their wavelengths less than the ion clouds in the CMB did C: Redshift was immediately culminated by the decay of the clouds of ion gas that both occured simultaneously before before the last scattering Maybe you quote the link I put underneath that sentence as well.

That's because you have still failed to read my OP. Non-locality isn't accepted by every physicist. I had nearly a dozen papers in my OP discussing non-instantaneous particle entanglement which would undoubtedly imply Unified Field Oscillations: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/04/einstein-s-spooky-action-distance-spotted-objects-almost-big-enough-see see how the second method would be used for unification. Do you know that we rather recently achieved rudimentary signalling via what they think is ESP? https://www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2018-04-quantum-physicists-entanglement.amp My op is non-unifying gravity, because there is no non-locality, mechanics is all classical. Turtles all the way down, no need for anything to be unified. You're not refuting the direct cause for redshift. Those photon wavelengths went from orange to red the instant the clouds of ion gas that filled the early universe dissipated, that was my answer for "why did the wavelength increase". Expansion caused those ion clouds to expand. So you falsely accused my answer as being wrong, I would appreciate it if you'd just admit that and be a little humble.

Superluminal synchronization of inverse particle spins in this scenario occurs by adding the velocity in which half of the gravity wave propagates from the relativistic particle as it crosses paths with like particles with perpendicular trajectories. So we need granular coordinates like that for these kinds of non-vanishing classical gravitational components to wave through.

Good, you concede via omission that the dispersion of the clouds of ion gas was directly culminated by the redshift of the photon vacuum radiation. I know my astrophysics. Back on topic: So I'm thinking in order to turn my OP into a geodesic we take a koch snowflake, iterate it (600 billion light years over ten to the power of negative thirty five meters) times. Take each triangle and turn them into cones. Take the circles at the base of the cones and transform them into spheres. Turn half of the spheres inside out now we have it so they make contact with a parallel inversed copy of this operation at the highest iteration & conduct a branar cancellation where outside in sphere meets inside out sphere. That's your coordinate system. Assuming space, time, matter & energy are apart of one continuum, cancelled by a negative continuum. You would need to connect koch snowflakes first, do this for the inversed parallel operations: Fold that into a sphere. This accounts for every 360 degree angle frame drag of the brane built from the original singular Koch snowflake representing a cosmos that we can only observe 1/45th of. You notice things only rotate in a phi fashion

Would it be possible to apply a non-vanishing rule that makes 0 the asymptotic where the wavelength is black. Imagine a non-zero, zero-point virtual-particle pseudo-energy. It's highly dispersed like a normal amount of butter spread about a piece of toast the size of this galaxy. Even state a neutrino with a shorter wavelength is heavier than a neutrino with a longer wavelength? I believe this is all you need in order to do what you were trying to do.

It does matter that I was right in saying that the dissipation of the ion clouds was culminated by redshift. That was the DIRECT cause for redshift. It DOES matter that you said that was wrong, giving the INDIRECT cause as expansion. A brane, the mathematical term, is not intrinsically string theory. It's intrinsically a word meaning width times height times depth in geometry. So I can apply it to ANY interpretation Especially when the interpretation builds rudimentary equations that predict the exact same values that standard interpretations equations for black evaporation rates and quantum entangling velocities under a completely different axiomatic syntax of the physical. This interpration was applied, in the OP, to equations which you are still dancing around with irrelevant distractions like whether or not I fathomed the physics in a video, so it can be applied to a geodesic. All I need is tensor calculus, tensor calculus, and the definitions of relevant physics symbols most of which aren't even used in the standard model

*INDIRECT*

Or is it that you refuse to make sense of it? I'm well aware as to the motives behind burrying any realistic form of Unified Field Oscillations beneath a century of statistical probability. IIRC that event occurs AFTER the opacity interference that were these massive clouds of ions clears up

Dude, the wavelength of photons has redshifted because the opacity interference in photon paths has cleared up. It has cleared up due to the last scattering. The last scattering was due to expansion. What part of indirect consequence are you playing dumb about/spamming over with page filling charts??? Explain why. Is there a reason it doesn't make sense?

Honestly, since you cannot (will-not) entertain this concept - it would be impossible for you to address the equations in any case.

That has everything to do with the wavelength. Even under current expansion the wavelength of photons is greatly decreased through a medium like crystal. If there had been a modern-like vacuum anywhere in the cmb expansion wouldn't have changed the wavelength within that ion-cloudless gap at all. If I had said expansion you could have said that was only an indirect consequence. Try your trick questions on someone who doesn't know any better.

Ion clouds dissapitated as the first atoms formed & gathered together to form into the first stars & galaxies, which dispersed. Are you ever going to get to my equations?

Different axiom on what's being erased and how it's being erased from the interpretation used in the OP explained on this page than the one employed by string theory.

Wavelength increased.

You'd have to physically quote where I put check marks in the OP. They are approximated values btw, because I didn't feel like putting 41 digits for the exact lp/tp. These are just ways of defining the general scale relativity of contractions and dilations caused by the value of lambdamax and over various distances under the axiomatic syntax above, coming to the same conclusions as the standard model based on measurements in a different way without the same axiomatic syntax of the standard model based on those measurements

Because those calculations in my OP, however limited in what they can describe compared to a full blown geodesic, actually predicted the rate of black hole evaporation without using the standard method for finding the rate of black of black hole evaporation. They also defined what could synchronize inverse particle spins under local realism, which is huge enough to make satellite communication technologies look like the messenger pidgeon. But in order for anyone to apply it on the engineering level I need to describe what those equations described with a proper geodesic. Which would take me "years of preliminary work to even begin approach" considering the fact that, to me, tensors look like gibberish