inSe

What I do know is n in gamma is going to be a tiny fraction considering this is particle physics, which is how I know the left side of the affinity is the asymmetric. It seems like the affine is the subscript of the gauge? Then with a smooth manifold I have to get a rough koch/hilbert curve manifold before I can even start the geodesic

I knew the left side of the affinity equation would be negative looking at it and that didn't make sense to me. Now it does, it also makes since now looking at what you just wrote is 2i=A why the affine gauge is a 4d. But I'm not familiar with standard form yet. What I don't understand is what to plug in, or where. Esp for the so(3)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1010.0775.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05341.pdf That's how it works for a koch snowflake But the dislocations still were not necessary for when I calculated spook action (close enough to match it's measured velocity suggesting particle velocity plus g wave velocity is what t-bones particles with perpendicular trajectories synchronizing the spins of said particles at a superluminal rates given v(gw)=c), because I wasn't calculating this velocity for any particle trajectory in particular.

Koch *snowflake

They weren't random or wild. They were creative explanations for deleterious di-brane based solutions to the fundamental interactions along with spook action. This might be a variation of NC g but it doesn't involve a smooth manifold, so AGT is going to be tricky for this variation of NC g. That's based on equilateral triangles, which are smooth. How would that even work for Koch's triangle? I'm not saying it wouldn't involve vector calculus btw. Vector calculus isn't necessary in understanding straight trajectories in spook action or units of time in BH evaporation, or in the concept of six Euclidean dimensions as three positive euclidean dimensions plus three negative euclidean dimensions (a deleterious di-brane) until actual resulting structures form from the self-automated deletion of the smooth branes, leading to one non-smooth structure that looks like the universe: https://imgur.com/a/XdWp3

It hasn't been necessary yet, so far we have one interaction in which every variable is dependent on and you only need λmax to define it.

This is specifically why I said vector calculus does not apply here. The only fundamental interaction occurs when a positive density volume contacts with a negative density volume. They negate each other. I defined this process as time contraction/dilation dependent on the level of λmax. The reduction of the third dimension is Dynamical, which is time. I haven't gotten to that part yet. I had to lay the sediment by removing point like particles & confirming that my alternative meets actual measurements

No I backed it up with my λmax based equation, which matches a great deal of real measurements such as black hole evaporation and the measured velocity of "spook action" over 16km. If you believe my ideas are false you'll have to explain how my "bullshit" equation checked out with actual measurements of the physical universe on its own. It happened more than once, it was no accident or fluke that the velocities & rates of time were so close to what's measured. If I hadn't used the rounded lp & tp it would have matched exactly, & you can test that yourself.

Nope, you only need to use the equation for finding the volume density of sphere. Then invert it for the black holes. That's all you need to define these dimensions mathematically. Plus, without QCD or point-like particles, how can there be color charge. The dimensional analysis gets completely remade by the time you need to use vectors, that's past the defining state though. Yes. Any objections?

Non-unifying Geometrized Newton-Cartan Gravity The Fundamental Interactions I hypothesize that the quantum eraser is the only fundamental interaction. This interaction is between two boundless and inverted branes that are perpendicular to one another. Physicists seem to be thinking of Eigen values when I use the word "branes". This is geometrized Newton-Cartan gravity; vector calculus does not apply here. This is classical physics, not quantum mechanics. When I say brane I mean a conceivable geometric structure, three dimensions in the literal sense, not the metaphysics of some incomprehensible angle that forms a tesseract. View time as the second & a half dimension. A third dimension has time dilated to a stand still, but this fractal counterpart has time contracted as a dynamicalized version of that static temporal state. Time in this theory isn’t being thought of as a third dimension moving through the 4th dimension. William James Sidis, in The Animate and The Inanimate he becomes the second savant to predict the existence of black holes after Einstein. His black hole was different than Einstein's, it was a shard of a reverse universe, existing perpendicular to our own. That is the black hole in this theory, but this theory goes far more into speculative depth… (The reverse dimensionality is simply a matter of perspective, the reverse areas of the brane in my thesis represent volume mediums with negative densities, and the only points in our universe that are truly invisible via microwave spectroscopy are black holes. Whatever is visible in the microwave spectrum would be fundamentally composed of areas in the brane that represent positive density mediums. Six dimensions in this sense does not represent new angles that are beyond perception, they are just three positive plus three negative dimensional volumes. Contact between positive & negative density mediums leads to zero, equal nullification of both areas in an inversive brane. This is the essence of gravitation, the original pull that begins the infinite pendulum of cosmic evolution. Also why the white holes wrap around black holes like a hollow sphere (and in ADS, the inside out of this brane, the black holes form a hollow sphere around the white holes & black is the new white), until the black hole dissolves the hollow spherical quasar around it & vice versa. *This process is why local increases in thermal density will eventually increase entropy locally as well. [*That's how energy conservation is temporarily broken, that's why every antiproton becomes a proton & why there seems to be more matter than antimatter. It takes longer for fleeting energy to aggregate into matter than for matter to break apart into energy*]) …which leads to an equation that yields Einstein's tensor when accounting for frame dragging, because v(g) will equal c. Yes, yes, "retrocausality" is a result of the "quantum eraser", but in this framework it isn't a "quantum mechanical" eraser, it's a fracturing & re-organizing of the third dimension in two inside out branes on infinitely, yet paradoxically finite, scales (because at some point an approximately measureable part of reality does get erased). If you want to out-think a computer, than you must be able to use paradoxes. Computers can't process a paradox, a human mind can. Cantor & Zeno's infinitesimals are like pneumonic devices that I’ve used to see a larger mathematical picture here. A basis for concepts like scale relativity as a process in which mechanical structures like black holes can be found at every point in space. λmax is the maximum amount of entropy that can occur in a given medium volume. What my thesis says is simply that the perfect three dimensions of the brane are chipped away when that maximum amount of available entropy is lower - this is time contraction. The reverse of it is time dilation. If time goes, space goes. If space goes, everything surrounding that space gets closer together because the space separating those spaces no longer exists, ergo gravity. Electromagnetism and the strong & weak nuclear forces arise from the resulting fracture pattern in that part of the brane. If the brane gets fractured away at points located all around the observer in every which way, everything appears to be moving outward. Not so, gaps in reality are just being filled creating the illusion of expansion. The speed of light in this theory will be relative, not constant, because my f(n) equation will yield a fraction, meaning that it will employ fractal geometry. As the addition of luminal velocities can become superluminal only in two dimensional spaces, it can also be superluminal within any dimension that's less than 3. There's somewhere between 2 & 3 real physical dimensions any given point in space and time, so: ~|2x|+/-~|2x|=n; 6>n>4; & 2>x>1 f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3) c=c•x where f(x)=6/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where n>6 c=c•x where f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n n=the speed of gravitational wave propagation We're talking about potential interactions that are incredibly fast (involving a velocity that carries attractive or repulsive forces) & small (smaller than the spacetime foam). These events can barely be said to have even occurred in the first place. In this simple loophole we circumvent Bell’s inequality and we allow dark forces & unification to be made classical (non-QCD). The microscopic pilot wave is an aggregate of infinitesimal quantum eraser phenomena; gravity itself is a collection of these pilot waves. Ex.) How fast is the speed of light in a dense medium such as the heart of the sun? C at the center of the sun (which is 160 billion times denser than the surface) is 0.00551512557 m/s (covering the sun's radius in 4,000 years spending the vast majority of that time in the core). My equation gives the average speed of light throughout the entire sun in m/s: I found lambda max for the sun online: http://studylib.net/doc/18286845/hw-solution Link says 504 nm, or 5.04 x 10^-7 meters f(n)=(5.04 x 10^-7)(((4π/3)(*695,700,000)^3) *Radius of the sun in meters f(n)=7.1086177 x 10^20 c(f(n))=c•x where f(x)=6/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where n>6 c(f(n))=299,792,458(6/(7.1086177e+20/(4π/3))^(1/3)) c(f(n))=325 m/s The speed of light 13.5 billion years ago was around a million times slower due to ions. As evidenced by a cosmic event horizon that was only a few thousand light years as opposed to the current one which is 13 billion light years. The entire universe was about as dense as the sun, so the speed of light during the CMB & my measurements on the average speed of light from the inner layers of the sun to the outer layers of the sun, are about the same. For the average velocity to be in the hundreds of meters per second with a starting velocity in the hundredths of meters per second means that the speed of light would have to increase by 4 orders of magnitude when it escapes the inner layer of a star, & then from there light would increase by 6 orders of magnitude, back to normal speeds, as light escapes the outer layer of a star. Regarding the universe's current density, on the very large scale, the illusion of gravity c(f(n)) is a few percents faster because the volume area is massive yet not very dense at all, lambda max is a high integer on that scale, all that free redshifted entropy. This is why expansion overcomes light on that scale. Ex) λmax of background radiation is 1.07 mm, a radius of superluminal galactic expansion is like distance between milky way & Andromeda, 2.5 million light years f(n)=(0.00107)(((4pi/3)(2.3651826181452 x 10^22))^3) f(n)=1.0405037 x 10^66 f(n)>6, c(f(n))=(299,792,458)(6/((1.0405037 x 10^66)/(4pi/3))^(1/3)) c(f(n))=2.8614552 x 10^-13 m/s This will be used as mathematical evidence for dark energy as the result of superluminal gravity waves from beyond the known universe later. On the very small, the width of a hydrogen atom within the pseudo energies of the sinusoidal waveform of a photon in the virtual blueshift of Earth's atmosphere, lambda max is equally miniscule, so faster than light. We see this phenomenon in neutrinos, cherenkov radiation & entangled particles. Ex) λmax of chloranil radical anion = 450 nm. Elements such as these would have a radius of about 79 picometers. f(n)=(4.5 x 10^-7)(((4pi/3)(7.9 x 10^-11)^3) f(n)=9.2935662 x 10^-37 Recall; c(f(n))=c•x, f(x)=4/(n/(4pi/3)^3) where 4>n c(f(n))=299,792,458(4/(9.2935662e-37/(4π/3)^(1/3)) c(f(n))=2.0799896 x 10^45 m/s So it would require very faint gravity to overcome the speed of light within that range at that low level of thermodynamic conductivity. This is where we come into pilot g waves (micro expansion), which carry cherenkov radiation, neutrinos, & which also entangle particles (atomic nuclei) at that level. According to fiber optic measurements, c(f(n)) for these faint pilot waves would have to be 2.0799896 x 10^-49 m/s in order to overcome gravity & entangle particles at that range. So how is QE possible? It's the atomic oscillation frequency, the collection of particles phasing in & out of virtual states to create a hologram that acts like solid matter. In the virtual states, expansion occurs, & everything exists in a virtual state for the longest duration (longer than when it's "there"). In virtual states, you're left with a collection of micro vacuums in which this pilot wave of the components of gravity (gravitons) can surf the expansion of those microvacuums superluminally linking everything together in one big wave function (pilot wave liken to the as-of-yet unproven higgs field). This will be covered in depth later. The Cosmology Let's talk about the oldest observable light: http://sci.esa.int/science-e-media/img/45/i_screenimage_18245.jpg This was a primordial cloud of gas & cosmic dust. It was heavy in most places, tremendously so. Everything was so compact that it was causing interference patterns in photons, enough so that they travel slower. Hopefully it was the result of Ion interference, because if not that would mean light has mass. ;-) There's no proof that the universe was ever denser than it was then. There’s no physical proof of zero time, and there’s no physical proof of a big bang. Since the early 1990s it's been well-documented that there exists mass beyond the CMB; dark flow. Now there's more evidence than ever, cosmic bruising, the Bootes Void, etc. The source of these mass disturbances in the cosmos may be more of the universe from beyond the cosmic event horizon emitting Unruh radiation in the form of gravitational waves, that part of the universe would now be over 600 billion light years away. Gravity is not a static field; Newtonian expansion shows that frame dragging is a constant. GWs propagate at the speed of light (demonstrated by LIGO in 2017), so GW expansion (given it's the same as the current rate of expansion) involves the addition of luminal velocities for scale relativity: there could be superluminal GWs! Consider for a moment that if adjacent bodies are in a later state of expansion than the fully expanded CMB is now, than just as the current speed of light is faster than it was 13 billion years ago, the speed of GWs propagating from those ultra-low density, ludicrously wide bodies could be faster than anything you could imagine due to scale relativity, time becomes triply relative, quadruply relative, ad infinitum, to us. The fastest GWs have traveled the farthest to get here and have therefore lost the most strength. This gravitation doesn't have to be able to overcome mass to cause the expansion of the universe. This is because of the holographic principle, but we'll get to that later. Extra-cosmic gravitation would be unobservable, because we're closer to the stronger sources, & further from the weaker sources, yet the thing stretching the vacuum of space out is the amount by which the stronger gravity is winning the tug of war against the weaker gravity. Picturing that is like picturing a frame-dragging observer himself being frame-dragged from a 360 degree angle; it’s like three separate Rindler effects occurring simultaneously. From this picture we can derive equations in order to define the effects that this extra-cosmic gravitation will have on our cosmos: The stronger GWs win the tug of war over the weaker GWs, so we can attribute 68% of missing mass to their effects as they travel 27% of the length of total GWs involved in expansion, losing less strength as they get here at the same time as the GWs we attribute to 27% of the missing mass pulling from the opposite direction having traveled 68% of the length of total GWs involved in expansion. Recall earlier that the velocity of light dilates by 299792458/2.8614552e-13 over 2.5 million light years. Therefore, the speed of light is only viable over a distance of 2500000(9.461e+15)/1.0476923e+21=22.5758078016 meters in a near perfect vacuum (lambda max of the vacuum) Length of strong GWs (where v(g)=c) = 22.5758078016 x 299792458 = 6768056912.18 meters Total Length of GWs = length of the strong GWs/.05 = 135361138244 meters Length of left weak GWs = length of GWs x .27 = 36547507325.9 meters length of right weak GWs = length of GWs x .68 = 92045574005.9 meters Velocity of left weak gravitational waves = length of left weak GWs/length of strong GWs times the speed of light = 1618879273.21 m/s Velocity of right weak gravitational waves = length of right weak GWs/length of strong GWs times the speed of light = 4077177428.81 m/s Velocity of right weak GWs/velocity of left weak GWs = rate of expansion in a vacuum over total length of GWs = 2.51851851851 m/s Now the speed of light over the total length of GWs is found in the same way we found the speed of light over the length of 2.5 million light years: λmax of background radiation is 1.07 mm, the radius for total length of GWs = 135361138244/2 meters f(n)=(0.00107)(((4pi/3)(67680569122))^3) f(n)=12.4380444e+31 f(n)>6, c(f(n))=(299,792,458)(6/((2.4380444e+31)/(4pi/3))^(1/3)) c(f(n))=0.09999714934 meters Now we can find the velocity increases of c for every 22.5758078016 meter increase in the length of the GW with rate of expansion for total length of GWs = 2.51851851851 / the speed of light over total length of GWs = 0.09999714934 = +25.1859031496 m/s per 22.5758078016 meters. Let’s see if that checks out, 2500000(9.461e+15) = 2.36525e+22 meters. 2.36525e+22/22.5758078016=1.0476923e+21 m/s. 299,792,458 + 25.1859031496(1.0476923e+21) = 2.6387077e+22 meters ✓s within approximation. C dilates by 2.8614552e-13 over that same distance, 299,792,458/1.0476923e+21 = 2.8614552e-13 ✓ Okay moving on. In this theory the universe has no outer boundary limit. So eventually matter arrangements will repeat within larger & smaller structures. Black hole evaporation will be used to find a higher & lower cosmic scales using the proton’s frequency rate of one billion times per second, the size of a proton is 10−15 m and the Schwarzchild radius of its central black hole will give you the rate at which black evaporates. The Schwarzchild radius is 2.484e-54 meters (just type proton into where it says earth). The rate of evaporation is 8.41e-17 seconds (just type proton into where it says earth). That’s just the vanishing rate of the proton; oscillation frequency is more for how long it would take for another proton to form plus the time it took to evaporate. Protons form at a rate of 1e-9 - 8.41e-17 = 9.9999992e-10 seconds. Now that’s enough information to use in order to finally acquire enough evidence to either confirm or deny my hypothesis. But protons do not have λmax of a vacuum, that’s the problem, so for a proton we must use the original equation f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3);c=c•x where f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n to find the contraction of c with the λmax of a proton ≈ 395 nm. However, in the special case of black holes the equation must be modified. First of all, it’s 4πr^2 because the quasar within the Schwarzschild radius of the proton is a hollow sphere. Secondly, λmax of the proton’s quasar is the proton’s normal λmax but to the negative power of the proton’s length divided by twice the Schwarzschild radius f(n)=(3.95e-7^-(1e-15/2(2.484e-54)))((4π)(2.484e-54)^2)=7.753772e-107 c(f(n))=4/(7.753772e-107/(4π))^(1/2) = 1.610306e+54 m/s So a black hole with the mass of the sun (1391400000 meters) has a Schwarzschild radius of 2953 meters & will evaporate in 6.61e+74 seconds. f(n)=(5.04e-7^-1(1.3914e+9/5906)) x ((4π x 2953)^3) = 2.3886249e+25 m/s c(f(n))=6/(4π(2.3886249e+25^(1/2))=9.7693891e-14 m/s 1.610306e+54/299,792,458/9.7693891e-14=5.4981971e+58 5.4981971e+58/8.41e-17=6.5376898e+74 seconds ✓ Ladies & gentlemen we have ourselves a theory. Further investigations Assuming that the electron/positron is a nanoscopic primordial CMB cloud (& it acts like one); we use its oscillation frequency to find the moment of the big crunch in our universe (which is basically caused by overlapped radiation from dissolving galaxies being sprayed by the matter jets (the magnetic dipole moments) or the outflows of its accretion disk (magnetic monopole moments) of a superverse proton) by using the dilation of c equation to find the adjustment to our relative time-frame for that frequency: The electron most likely has a radius of 10^-12 m, & λmax of about 4e-7 m (visible spectrum is where electrons like to hide). f(n)=(4e-7)(4π/3(1e-12)^3)=1.6755161e-42 c(f(n))=4/(1.6755161e-42/(12π^(1/3)))=4.1957466e+43 m/s The CMB had a radius of 6.9 billion light years, or 6.52809e+28 meters, & λmax of about 1,000 nm. f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(6.52809e+28)^3)=1.1653249e+81 c(f(n))=6/(12π(1.1653249e+81)^(1/3))=1.5124155e-28 m/s 4.1957466e+43/1.5124155e-28=2.7742023e+71 seconds Or 8.7958221e+60 years, the few SMBHs caught in the big crunch will only be less than half-evaporated, so this can't be right! Grrr So, we use the time contraction of c equation to find a much larger planck length to see how many electrons fit into a super electron, this will give us a new size for the CMB, so that this process can be redone for a more accurate date for the big crunch. Okay, there's 6.52809e+28 meters in the radius of the CMB, using (4π/3(1e-12)^3), you can fit 1.165325e+123 electrons into the electrons of the next cosmic scale. Let's see if my math confirms that number using super lp: 2.7742023e+71/299,792,458/6.58e-15=1.4063439e+77 m/s. Planck length over planck time equals 296846011.132 m/s. 1.4063439e+77/296846011.132=4.737621e+68 m/s as your new planck length over planck time. 296846011.132 x 5.39e-44 equals lp, so super lp equals 1.4063439e+77 x 5.39e-44 = 7.5801936e+33 meters. 7.5801936e+33/4.737621e+68=1.6e-35, which is the planck length (lp). There's 3.125e+22 planck lengths in the length of an electron. 7.5801936e+33 x 3.125e+22 = 2.3688105e+56 meters for the superverse electron. Does not confirm, the CMB should be 2.3688105e+56/2=1.1844052e+56, 1.1844052e+56/6.52809e+28=1.8143212e+27 times larger than what we can see. We can't see so much of the CMB for the same reason we can't see forever into the past, it's from a combination of redshift & the fact that the ion interference makes light fade into oblivion eons before it gets near us. For our next dilation of c equation: f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+56)^3)=6.959684e+162 cubic meters c(f(n))=6/(12π(6.959684e+162)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-56 m/s 4.1957466e+43/8.3359856e-56=5.033294e+98 seconds, which is 1.5958446e+88 years. Which fits for the evaporation rate for most supermassive black holes (<100 million solar masses). But the few that are the largest in the universe, such as this one, they may grow to become superverse protons during a second or third cosmic life cycle. In the microverse, proton formation could bind cosmic rays, allowing them to exist in the long treks through the expanding vacuum of space. This also explains dark matter from a microverse's perspective. Exceptionally large SMBHs that were too large to evaporate in the previous cosmic life cycle may be the origin of this primordial SMBH. It could also explain this galaxy, which seems to lack a central black hole as well as dark matter. I'm very aware of the evaporation rate it was crucial in moving my did hypothesis to theory, but in cyclic models if one survives a big crunch it will have already undergone quite a bit of evaporation. Enough so to bind a galaxy with low mass per unit volume in it's dying troughs of life. I believe that there absolutely was a maximum solar mass BH at it's inactive center when it's photograph was taken. But being beneath the minimum for a supermassive black hole, we wouldn't have been attempting to spot anything beneath that minimum which would require much more sensitive observations. Now, on the note of micro black holes, the only reason a solar mass black hole could bind a galaxy would be because it was lacking dark matter, those overgrown protons that are in most other galaxies. Plus, second cosmic life cycle die hard SMBHs heat up when they get blasted at the birth of a new universe (in a cyclic cosmology of course). These protons are really just giant black holes in the microverse. The electromagnetic polar jets of radiation of the primordial CMB would be the polarity of a giant electron. The neutron is a monster of a neutron star in the microverse. Relatively nearby is the proton, if you're an observer within the microverse it's a quasar unlike anything you could imagine in power-scale, a gazillion times larger than that behemoth within the core of the IC 1101 galaxy (which is by far the largest SMBH we know about at 4e+10 to 10e+10 solar masses). The giant proton-quasar feeds the neutron, this kronos of a pulsar. Well, normally the pulsar feeds the quasar since the BH possesses a greater density of "mass", but most cases the proton is positively charged as opposed to the anti-proton. For most of its life, the anti/proton's quasar material is attracted to the neutron/micro-pulsar. Now, however, please note all neutron-proton nuclei begin their life-cycles with the proton actually being a negatively charged anti-proton in this Theory - but their life cycles end with the it being a normal positively charged proton feeding the neutron with matter emanating from the single down quark of the proton to the single up quark of the neutron before the cycle repeats with the reverse of that: with the neutron feeding the proton. This means that its down quarks are a holographic compilation of magnetic dipole moments, the up quark is a hologram composed of a collection of briefer magnetic monopole moments - & vice versa for protons. Virtual particles aren't really what we think they are. Between negatively charged states, micro-expansion takes over, because positively charged protons are dispersing thermal picoscopic gasses, fleeting from evaporated black holes, & it takes a lot more time for new protons to form than to evaporate as shown during the oscillation frequency. This solves the antimatter problem. https://i.imgur.com/YZFSQIy.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ZWp0Ehz.jpg This is much more versatile than QM, it works in explaining virtually any quantum effect. For instance, let's use the quantum venn diagram paradox; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcqZHYo7ONs&t=25s https://i.imgur.com/VxO1oaS.jpg The non-virtual photons adopt new polarities as they expand, aka wave, through the vacuum mediums of the quantum sub-foam microverse. More polarizing filters=greater variety of polarities. Quark-gluon plasma is the absolute densest state matter can take. We see it in the cores of neutron stars, discs of quasars as matter is folded upon itself by compressing spacetime (gravity/mass/dark matter) around macro black holes, & in the cosmic microwave background radiation. But in this hypothesis it's more like a black star in a fully classical, not just semiclassical, framework of gravity. Any denser, & matter is just a macro black hole as there's no space between micro black holes. It's composed of micro quasars with micro black holes at their cores, barely held apart by micro expansion. Unlike vacuum radiation & the atomic world, these microverses are non-anthropic (no stellar eras) because less entropy equates to less complexity. Quark-gluon plasma is the only state of matter composed entirely of microverses that are exclusively the same as itself. Atoms & vacuum radiation will have microverses with atoms, quark-gluon plasma & vacuum radiation within them, quark-gluon plasma is only composed of microverses that are entirely filled with quark-gluon plasma. I want to look at how particles of different kinds might be entangled in this theory: Forward moving gravitational waves in front of relativistic particles yank particles with perpendicular trajectories at intersection points, this allows particles to communicate faster than the speed of light. It's like an array of electrons through the 16,000 meter copper wire continuously getting T-boned by the G waves of other electrons, synchronizing their spins. Now this theory isn't in the normal form you'd see with it's lambdamax 4/3pi r cubed, but math is math & there's some debate as to whether the form of math we're accustomed is even real. In reality math is just the yin yang pattern of nature so my form's as good or real or accurate as any. Earlier we determined that Quote The CMB had a radius of 6.9 billion light years, or 6.52809e+28 meters, & λmax of about 1,000 nm. f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(6.52809e+28)^3)=1.1653249e+81 c(f(n))=6/(12π(1.1653249e+81)^(1/3))=1.5124155e-28 m/s However, we also determined that our observations o the CMB gave us only part of the picture Quote 7.5801936e+33 x 3.125e+22 = 2.3688105e+56 meters for the superverse electron. Does not confirm, the CMB should be 2.3688105e+56/2=1.1844052e+56, 1.1844052e+56/6.52809e+28=1.8143212e+27 times larger than what we can see. We can't see so much of the CMB for the same reason we can't see forever into the past, it's from a combination of redshift & the fact that the ion interference makes light fade into oblivion eons before it gets near us. For our next dilation of c equation: f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+56)^3)=6.959684e+162 cubic meters c(f(n))=6/(12π(6.959684e+162)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-56 m/s So this superverse electron is 1.8143212e+27 x 13.8 billion light years. It's therefore 2.5037633e+37 light years in diameter, with a radius of 1.1844052e+53 meters. So our dilation of c equation becomes f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+53)^3)=6.959684e+153 c(f(n))=6/(12π(6.959684e+153)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-53 m/s So, not only is the CMB expanding, not only is it a giant electron, not only is it spun by outside gravitational forces, but it also is going in one direction with a velocity, the gravitational waves propagating at the speed in which it's moving plus the speed at which gws propagate at a length of 2.3688104e+53 meters. We can determine from all of this the velocity at which particles become entangled in the superverse, & from that we can determine the velocity in which they become entangled in the subverse (sub-atomic world). The electron travels at 2,200 kilometers per second, Since the speed of light for a superversal electron is going to be 136.269299091 times faster than the speed of that electron, all we need is the relative speed of light for that portion of a superverse, which can be found using the length of GWs for the superverse electron (2.3688104e+53 meters) which we find by multiplying the speed of light by the length of c's gws which we actually determined earlier: Quote Recall earlier that the velocity of light dilates by 299792458/2.8614552e-13 over 2.5 million light years. Therefore, the speed of light is only viable over a distance of 2500000(9.461e+15)/1.0476923e+21=22.5758078016 meters in a near perfect vacuum (lambda max of the vacuum) Length of strong GWs (where v(g)=c) = 22.5758078016 x 299792458 = 6768056912.18 meters 299792458(2.3688104e+53/6768056912.18)=1.0492694e+52 m/s. Now wait, that's not actually the speed of light in the superverse, but it is the speed of gravity waves for the superverse electron, which will be added to Super C/136.269299091 in order to find the rate at which electrons entangle other particles in the superverse. Earlier we found super tp & super lp, which can be used to find super c: Quote Okay, there's 6.52809e+28 meters in the radius of the CMB, using (4π/3(1e-12)^3), you can fit 1.165325e+123 electrons into the electrons of the next cosmic scale. Let's see if my math confirms that number using super lp: 2.7742023e+71/299,792,458/6.58e-15=1.4063439e+77 m/s. Planck length over planck time equals 296846011.132 m/s. 1.4063439e+77/296846011.132=4.737621e+68 m/s as your new planck length over planck time. 296846011.132 x 5.39e-44 equals lp, so super lp equals 1.4063439e+77 x 5.39e-44 = 7.5801936e+33 meters. 7.5801936e+33/4.737621e+68=1.6e-35, which is the planck length (lp). lp: 7.5801936e+33 meters tp: 7.5801936e+33/296846011.132 = 2.5535777e+25 seconds To find super c we do (2.5535777e+25/5.39e-44)(7.5801936e+33/1.6e-35)/299792458=7.486864e+128 m/s (which can actually be used to find the size of structures in the super super verse because the length of this GW on the super verse scale equals the 6768056912.18 meters in which luminal GWs begin to propagate on our scale). Okay so the superverse electron travels at 7.486864e+128/136.269299091=5.494168e+126 m/s, on one side, depending on what direction it's going, the GWs of the forward direction entangles particles directly in front at a velocity of 1.0492694e+52 (velocity of gws for superverse electron) + 5.494168e+126 (the speed of the electron). But remember that as you chain link more particles via entanglement, there's a dilation of entangled velocities just like with the speed of light being dependent on the length of the GWs. Recall earlier c(f(n)) for an electron was found to be Quote The electron most likely has a radius of 10^-12 m, & λmax of about 4e-7 m (visible spectrum is where electrons like to hide). f(n)=(4e-7)(4π/3(1e-12)^3)=1.6755161e-42 c(f(n))=4/(1.6755161e-42/(12π^(1/3)))=4.1957466e+43 m/s 4.1957466e+43, but remember we'd have to divide this velocity by the length of the electron times the speed of light to account for the contraction of time. 4.1957466e+43/(1e-12 x 299792458)=1.3995504e+47 m/s The larger the distance being covered, the slower QE's velocity will be relative to the speed of light. Let's measure QE for a 16km copper wire; V(sa)=299792458 + ((1.3995504e+47 x .136269299091)/(8.5e+28 x 16000)) V(sa)=1.4023517e+13 m/s. Over 46,777 times faster over a 16 kilometer distance according to my approximation, but exactly 13,800 times faster according to the measurements. A photon isn’t even a point particle in this theory, it’s a bunch of tiny galaxy clusters tugging each. A neutrino is like a decaying neutron star that is a few trillion light years in diameter.