Yetikick

Is this very theoretical though. Dark matter science is pretty poor being that we aren’t technological enough to even detect it yet? i think the point in trying to make is there’s a lot we have yet to discover. I generally agree with science as it stands right now but then again once upon a time Einstein’s theories were totally accepted and we now know that this is no longer the case in some respects. we simply have such little knowledge on things like dark matter that in time what we believe now may I fact end up being totally wrong, or correct for that matter. ill always remain open to new ideas and theories, even some that are far fetched. Ok maybe not as far fetched as the crap Hudson says is possible.

Yeah I get that. Where can I find the evidence that dark matter is all around us?

Yes I totally understand the science and knowledge we presently have for dark matter. But let’s be fair here. We haven’t actually had any dark matter to test in a lab environment and any dark matter we have tried to detect is so far away from us that in reality we don’t really have a clue about it yet. It could still be absolutely anything. As for nonesense needing research comment. Yes the monatomic Gold theory etc by Hudson is a load of balcony. I’m not talking about that. Of course is nonesense. Of course monatomic Gold or any other monatomic element won’t make people superhuman. I have no interest in his theories. I do have an interest in monatomic states of elements though. And being that we as a race are clearly very naive still who knows what we’ll learn as time progresses.

Totally agree it’s most likely crappy science, however a lot of crappy science from many moons ago ended up being true. Plus we have no science to validate or dismiss this. So making a statement that it’s not undiscovered science is very non-scientific as you cannot prove that either. i certainly don’t think monatomic particles are dark matter but then again stating dark matter doesn’t interact electromagnetically is also terrible science as we haven’t proven that yet either. just as the OP said, it’s an interesting subject that probably needs some more research. Not sure why people are trying debunk the comments of the OP and myself as both of us have clearly stated that we don’t support these theories rather just interested in the subject of monatomic particles if there is some science related to them that we are presently unaware of.

Interesting subject. Discovered this forum while also trying to look for some actual science for or against. Ok yes of course there’s Hudson’s science but that’s not really real science due to the fact that he’s not entirely competent in the first place. I also cannot find any science that contras the monatomic state of metal atoms theory. Could this be a whole area of undiscovered science? Of course it could. We certainly have a lot still to learn. Is it likely? That’s a very different question. I also like the theory that monatomic particles could in fact be dark matter. It certainly fits somewhat and we have little other theory at this time. Again not very likely. Will be interesting to see what we discover over the next 50 years, if I live that long.