Kylon

I have an idea on how to easily eliminate nuclear waste. The hotter things are, the faster the emit radiation. The more radiation they emit, the less radiation left to emit. Basically, if we got a big insulated tungsten pot, put a bunch of radioactive waste in there, heated it to 2,500 degrees, we could probably generate more energy from it than we lost. I am a creative problem solver, and I am highly uneducated, but do you think this has merit? Instead of taking 10,000 years to eliminate, it could take 10-1000 years to eliminate the radiation, meanwhile a energy surplus could be generated.

Dang, that stinks, that means I will still have to develop the cells I get! Would it make connections easier to make if I had more capacity?

I have a stupid question, but it needs to be asked. This(believe it or not) has relevance to me in my real life. I was wondering if you could simply generate more brain cells to inject into your brain, could you increase your intelligence dramatically?

I have an idea, Hybrid all the different ant species, Did you know? There are farmer ants, slave/raiding ants, rancher ants, weaver ants, nomadic hunter ants, foraging ants, guardian ants I have an ideas, take all these ants, Grow them in large colonies, then start mixing up the breeding between the different forms of ants. Then we could mix these ants with termites. Go to Encarta.com and search for Ants Anyway if we mixed these ants all together, we could probably create some sort of extremely advanced(for insects) type of species. A larger, smarter, farming, herding, foraging, hunting, slaving ant race. Termites can eat wood, grass and other things containing cellulose. Termites super specialize, Male and female workers, Larger food supply, Queens can produce 30,000 eggs a day

Okay, I have always been a little more, advanced, than the group around me(or at least I think I am). I found out that schools look more towards achievement nowadays, and less towards grades. Also I think the whole IQ test is just how well you can take the test. Anyways, I have always been interested in power and science because I like science. I came up with likes of concepts, theories ect... and alot of them could be realisticly applied to the world around me. I think that since the brains development starts at age 0-25 and it still develops after that but not hardly as much, then what schools push for is LEARN EVERYTHING THAT IS ALREADY BEEN DONE. CONFORM. DO NOT BE CREATIVE. YOU ARE BEING PREPARED FOR THE WORK FORCE TO BE A DRONE. I really think this kind of educational method a( deters and destroys creativity. b( removes alot more of the creative individuals from positions where they can help people. What do you think? No creativity being developed means that less creativity will not be as much their later on. MORE CREATIVITY MIXED WITH LEARNING. MORE APPLICATION OF SCIENCE AND NOT JUST THE ASSIMILATION OF KNOWLEDGE!

I think this all depends, I think that in the future, with all this "Pure knowledge" you can't do very much. You need to be CREATIVE, not just recite facts. You need to SOLVE PROBLEMS, not just discuss ones that are/have been already solved. I think in the future better education techniques, biomedical technology will allow us to learn far more than we could possibly ever hope to learn now. You may say, "Well, that looks IMPOSSIBLE THERES NO WAY!" but trust me, if there is enough profit to be had, SOMEBODY WILL FIND A WAY.

Just compare Sars to Ebola, and it won't look so bleak.