PHYSICALMODEL2017

1-I talked about two points , not two galaxies , you are mistaking me for that 2-the behaviour of celestial bodies is more complex , and we cannot judge the behaviour of the universe 3- a universe without some laws that govern its inflation is chaotic , the homogeneity of space fabric is a testimony against that 4-the inflation speed is tightly regulated by dimensional energy symmetry it is the basic law of nature

dear sir 1-as for the constant inflation speed of (C) , it is with respect to a certain frame of reference ( impossible to determine with our state of knowledge , but we already know that exists and we know also the maximum speed limit for anywhere in the space fabric away from this unknown reference point and I did not mention at all that earth is the reference point , 2- for a universe that is spherical in shape with a constant inflation speed = (C) the RELATIVE speed between any two points may be greater than (C) but not more than 2 (C) as each point is heading in space into an opposite direction 3- the relative speed between two galactic bodies cannot tell about the state of the universe's inflation since it is influenced by gravitational attraction of nearby galaxies

dear sir with due respect 1-this work is not replacing anything , it integrates an already existing knowledge and builds upon it 2- this model provides very solid physical meaning- and very reasonable one - of the theory which no mathematical model will provide which defies many people , including some scientists 3- abstract thinking is what leads science , most of the major breakthroughs in science were the result of abstract thinking as it should always be the first step

dear sir with due respect , 1- can you please give me an example of my linguistic mistakes I would appreciate those people who show me my shortcomings so that I can correct them rather than praising my errors 2- I said that the universe is expanding at a speed equals (C) in an outwardly direction not equal to H as you talk about 3- spacetime is spacefabric and this is not my expression , it is Einstein's , maybe he was wrong also 4- I can make a 400 pages of mathematical formulations without reaching any substantive results abstract and physical understanding Is always a first step and mathematical modelling is always a second step 5- the more complicated your mathematical modelling becomes , the less likely it will reach any results 6- energy cannot expand in space and in time at the same time apart from thermal energy there must be a penalty ( constrain) on either cases 7- my model is clearly an extension of the eather notion , it is quantized in nature and this is at the origin of quantum phenomena 8- the modern physics is far from being mutually exclusive in so far as the contents of vacuum would be 9- the dimensional energy constraining dives mater this pseudo independence of the time dimension

dear sir with due respect as to your remarks 1- I did not say that hubble constant is constant over time I specifically , and explicitly said that the universe inflation speed might have been slower during the primordial time 2- I specifically and explicitly said over and over again ( no less than 3 times ) that the spin I am talking about is totally different from atomic spin 3- there is nothing in nature that does not spin , though they might not do it like a billiard ball 4- I already use a spell checker as I wrote this paper as to dark energy , there is no specific entity as such , there is just the space fabric that is expanding due to the effects of planck sacle forces

dear sir it means that the universe is expanding at the rate equal to C in all 3 spatial directions this would create a sphere with a radius of 13.7 billion years which is the observable universe

dear sir again with due respect what would be the corresponding length ( in light years) for a universe that is expanding at the rate of 300000 km/sec given a hubble constant is 71 km /sec per 3.28 mega parsecs? just answer me please in my derivation C is PER length ( observable universe radius ) not just the speed of light , just as H is 71 km/sec PER parsec As to hubble distance , it equals ( almost ) to the age of the universe that's what my paper says

dear sir with all due respect to you and to mr wolfram there is nothing that happens in nature which is coincidence it does not take a great mathematician to calculate this if the universe is expanding at 71 km / sec for every 3.28 light years ( in length ) what would be the corresponding length if it is expanding at the rate of 300000 km /sec the result is in length and not in time units and it expresses the total length travelled by light since the big bang for dimensional analysis ( c*p/H) = ( LT^-1 * L / (LT^-1) ) = LENGTH remember the units (H) for this derivation are L/T if you want to use the units of ( H) as ( LT^-1)/L THEN THE UNITS OF (C) HAVE TO BE ( LT^-1)/ L I myself was surprised to find out this result and calculated many times and it all lead to the same result

i had a paper , it is called (the physical model of quantum interaction between fundamental forces of nature ) it 's at http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0280 This is a model characterized by its simplicity , it explains the events running from the big bang to the present day and scales from the planck scale to the size of the universe , all these in terms of one sub particle and a set of four fundamental forces along with their subsequent interactions This is a bottom up approach instead of the usual top down one the interaction at the planck scale level holds a determinant role in the play of forces at a cosmological level OF course comments and suggestions are welcomed O PHYSICAL MODEL2017.pdf