David Hine

Science and Religion cannot be separated. To do so results in science becoming just the fake ideas and agendas of corrupt individuals that do not have a clue, and cannot see what is true. Science today is a mess, and much of the public now regard it as a joke -humans from monkeys and aliens lurking -I spotted one lurking in the dark shadows of Harrow Bus Station (attached), David

So, Jesus did exist in his spiritual form right from Day 1. 'Human' Jesus began His 'Second Covenant' (Times and a Half), and that's what many think is the start of Christianity. In fact Christianity began with THE Creation, as described in KJ Geneses.

The essential thing to accept is the truth of the Torah (Jewish Old Testament), and the later from Greek New Testament. The best unbiased English translation ever is the KJ (Authorised) version. This has not been influenced and corrupted by today's science agendas. Genesis has been so 'tightly worded' in the KJ, so as not to allow the introduction of 'extra' fake time scales. It very specifically states that Jesus Created by His Word all things in 6 of 24 hour days -no more and no less. Geneses was worded 'tightly' because Jesus knew of the fake 'big bang' and evolution teachings that would come in the 19th and 20th Centuries. These lies persist today, to the detriment of all. The Torah also tells us how all things are 'held together' by Jesus, and how He 'Stretches out the Skies' (Hubble), and this is all revealed in the maths of the universe. Constants like Pi, Hubble's at 70.98047 (Astrogeometry), and the Gravitational Constant and Light speed (C), are all interlinked and related mathematically by exact and precise ratios. With kind regards, David.

Pack it in before it bankrupts you, and get a proper job in Tesco's or McDonald's, David

At least were moving this in the right direction. Much more interesting than quantum crap, David

Hi Taingorz, I agree with 90% of your post. All developments today come from commercial industry, the NHS, and so forth. Sometimes industry work with colleges, such as Imperial here in London under joint research programmes, but that's about it. The last 'academic' breakthroughs were from Hubble and Einstein, a fellow Jew, who grasped a fundamental concept through being inspired by Maxwell's equations, but this was over 100 years ago. Hubble's observations were the very last of note from academia. The 'era' of academia is now firmly over. Stephen Hawking contributed nothing original, and just parroted Einstein and Hubble. It become like a silly show, where he often blasphemed The Holy Spirit in public, and along with deluded Dawkins, they were no more than 'fools'. There are now no original thoughts coming out of academia, and if anyone dare to suggest something original, it's instantly condemned. We now know Hubble' s Constant is 70.98047 beyond all doubt, and that was instantaneously condemned without them even seeing the equation!!!! So 'big bang' is now dead, and the field open for a better model. For me, the Torah Genesis account of the universe ticks all the boxes, and as it was handed to Moses from our Creator, Jesus, is beyond all doubt. Kind regards, David All the 'new' developments today come from Chinese and Indian industries. All the stuff in the shops now comes from the far east, where new technologies are continuously emerging. It's a 'second' industrial revolution, and we are now merely a customer. We need to accept that as fact. EMI in Hayes did much research in many areas, including medical, but sadly now is gone. It's all now done in China. Philips (Sony) here still do research, but that's about it. All science here (UK) now does is 'brainwashing' with fake theories -so sad, when only 60 years ago, it was open, honest, and productive, David

I agree with Taingorz. It's just the same in the UK. If you don't bow down and conform to their fake 'big bang' hypothesis, you're a 'heretic'. They forget that BB was put forward as a joke by Rev. Lemaitre in 1927 to wind up some extremely pompous scientists of that day. New 'fools' are still 'fooled' by it to this very day. Nothing changes. Beyond belief!!! David

Moontanman. Congratulations. You have just blasphemed Moses, and the Holy Spirit in public. You must repent your sins to Jesus. You are a 'fool' to pit your 2 puny brain cells against the Creator of all things. Your stupidity does not amaze me, as it's Satan controlling you. I've seen this thousands of times when 'Satan's puppets' all come out with the same nonsense!!! -Not even original!! If you repent, Satan will be powerless against you. Scientific 'knowledge cuts no ice' with Jesus on the Judgement, and science is the domain of Satan, especially when it's corrupted with evolution nonsense. Google 'The Sinner's Prayer'. David

The Relativity Theories are both Aether Theories. Einstein said that himself, but many choose to 'forget' that. Inertia is also 'enabled' by a property of the aether, as is Hubble's Constant of 70.98047, David

The best hint I can give you, that until you have studied the little book I'm forbidden to mention here, is that the Aether concept will need to be re-introduced. This also has an interesting maths description, but not for consumption, until the 'big bang' nonsense is firmly consigned to where it belongs - in the bin of science follies, David

Members 12 21 posts Report post Posted 4 minutes ago Hi, In reality, no one in secular science has any clue about the early universe, and how it came into existence. The 'big bang' is not the truth -it fails dismally at every new challenge, so has to be constantly 'fudged' as more data comes in from the Astronomers. Non existent dark matter etc., and 'god particle' nonsense is the latest 'cheating' in this ever continuing saga of 'big bang' lies. When will these bb lies stop?? Until something 'better' comes along (very unlikely), we only have the Creation account as handed to Moses by Jesus, as described in The Torah. As a Jew, I firmly believe The Word of God (Jesus), and I know by faith it's the true explanation. The Hubble 70.98047 stuff is a direct revelation of this. The Torah is intensely mathematical, and this maths is also to be found in all the sciences. Even the electrochemical series and atomic theory has this same interconnecting maths framework basis. Pi is a very very special Constant, that embraces and describes 'space time' precisely, and so is found in most maths describing real dynamic scientific situations. That is not by chance. We call this way of thinking, Gematria. David

Hi Charles, In reality, no one in secular science has any clue about the early universe, and how it came into existence. The 'big bang' is not the truth -it fails dismally at every new challenge, so has to be constantly 'fudged' as more data comes in from the Astronomers. Non existent dark matter etc., and 'god particle' nonsense is the latest 'cheating' in this ever continuing saga of 'big bang' lies. When will these bb lies stop?? Until something 'better' comes along (very unlikely), we only have the Creation account as handed to Moses by Jesus, as described in The Torah. As a Jew, I firmly believe The Word of God (Jesus), and I know by faith it's the true explanation. The Hubble 70.98047 stuff is a direct revelation of this. The Torah is intensely mathematical, and this maths is also to be found in all the sciences. Even the electrochemical series and atomic theory has this same interconnecting maths framework basis. Pi is a very very special Constant, that embraces and describes 'space time' precisely, and so is found in most maths describing real dynamic scientific situations. That is not by chance. We call this way of thinking, Gematria. David

These arguments will rage until we have the wisdom and courage to condemn the fake 'big bang' hypothesis to the speculation bin. I would say it's the 'biggest blunder' to date in cosmology, infinitely greater than Einstein and the Cosmological Constant episode. That was quite understandable, given the circumstances then. Supposedly intelligent people are now totally fooled by 'big bang', -it's the CURSE that will eventually destroy all scientific credibility if it continues unchecked, David

Interesting, so why does Adam Riess and his special team at NASA say the Hubble acceleration is now speeding up?? It's the Hubble expansion and acceleration rate they are monitoring, not some ancient history that cannot be verified, as no one was there. So is Adam Riess and NASA peddling fake science???? David Real and properly measured Hubble rates are documented on Wikipedia in a Hubble Constant Chart. That has immensely more 'positive' meaning that guess work theoretical hypothetic chart, David

Don't you realise 'big bang' is pure speculation?? It's NOT proven science. So it's in the same category as 'The Principe of Astrogeometry', except that reveals the true Hubble value of 70.98047. The 'big bang' reveals only lies. that will lead to yet more lies Also, why do you need to 'hide' behind an alias?? Are you guilty of something criminal, or ashamed to reveal your proper identity for some other reason?? That is certainly not the measure of an honest man or trusted scientist. Martin Rees talks utter crap, but he is honest (truly believing his nonsense), upright, and is certainly not a snivelling cowardly tick skulking 'in the dark' hiding behind an alias. I respect Martin for his honest, open, and good principles in life. So, by that 'yardstick' this whole forum is fake, and it should all be put into the speculations bin. This is truth, but evil doers and liars prefer to skulk furtively in dark shadows, and deny truth. Sadly, much of science today is corrupted by secret 'agendas' and 'grant grabbing' from public funds by tricking the 'holders of the purse', and not open and honest as it was 100 years ago. I'm glad I worked for the UK Military, and not in some dodgy and corrupt university conning public money for fake science projects. David Hine The only thing you are capable of doing honestly is banning me, so please do that so I don't waste any more time here.

Hi, I raised the subject recently in the cosmology section showing that Hubble's Constant can now be calculated to be an unchanging and 'fixed' 70.98047 kilometres per sec per meg parsec. This has been pushed, without my awareness, to the 'speculations' area. I am not directly objecting to that, BUT does anyone here realise the 'big bang' model is also purely and extremely 'speculative'???? None of it is proven fact, and increasingly has to be 'fudged' to fit in with new data that the Astronomers are observing. Hence 'dark' matter / energy -fake concepts to 'balance the fake books of 'big bang'!! That's NOT science in any way, but purely 'speculation', proving scientists do not understand very much about the universe, and certainly not its origin. So my request, for this (to be a properly truthful scientific forum), anything to do with the 'big bang' hypothesis should also be moved to 'speculations'. To do that would take courage, but would earn great respect in the future when the 'big bang' hypothesis is finally consigned to the 'science bin of follies'. Regards, David

Hi, I raised the subject recently in the cosmology section showing that Hubble's Constant can now be calculated to be an unchanging and 'fixed' 70.98047 kilometres per sec per meg parsec. This has been pushed, without my awareness, to the 'speculations' area. I am not directly objecting to that, BUT does anyone here realise the 'big bang' model is also purely and extremely 'speculative'???? None of it is proven fact, and increasingly has to be 'fudged' to fit in with new data that the Astronomers are observing. Hence 'dark' matter / energy -fake concepts to 'balance the fake books of 'big bang'!! That's NOT science in any way, but purely 'speculation', proving scientists do not understand very much about the universe, and certainly not its origin. So my request, for this (to be a properly truthful scientific forum), anything to do with the 'big bang' hypothesis should also be moved to 'speculations'. To do that would take courage, but would earn great respect in the future when the 'big bang' hypothesis is finally consigned to the 'science bin of follies'. Regards, David

Hi, I raised the subject recently in the cosmology section showing that Hubble's Constant can now be calculated to be an unchanging and 'fixed' 70.98047 kilometres per sec per meg parsec. This has been pushed, without my awareness, to the 'speculations' area. I am not directly objecting to that, BUT does anyone here realise the 'big bang' model is also purely and extremely 'speculative'???? None of it is proven fact, and increasingly has to be 'fudged' to fit in with new data that the Astronomers are observing. Hence 'dark' matter / energy -fake concepts to 'balance the fake books of 'big bang'!! That's NOT science in any way, but purely 'speculation', proving scientists do not understand very much about the universe, and certainly not its origin. So my request, for this (to be a properly truthful scientific forum), anything to do with the 'big bang' hypothesis should also be moved to 'speculations'. To do that would take courage, but would earn great respect in the future when the 'big bang' hypothesis is finally consigned to the 'science bin of follies'. Regards, David

Moontanman -Hi there. I would never put myself at odds with what the Astronomers observe. Those guys really know their stuff, and have the amazing telescopes and facilities etc.. When Hubble first noticed the Hubble expansion way back in the 1920's, his constant was ten measured to be around 500. As measuring techniques improved, these now give very close results to the calculated Hubble Constant of 70.98047. I doubt very much if any further improvements will happen, and will always see slight + / - Hubble values measured. I believe different methods are used, and with other inevitable small variations that happen when measuring Hubble, it will always be + / - of 70.98047. This is very similar to physically measuring light speed, with Maxwell's equations 'fixing' C to the value now accepted as it's truth. Today, no one disputes this. Where we are going wrong today with Hubble is in the 'interpretation' of measured and calculated data. If 'interpretations' are based on a fake model ('big bang'), nothing else will make proper sense, and fake (incorrect) models have to be constantly 'fudged' when new data comes in. A good example of this is the 'introduction' of 'hypothesised' dark matter and energy that no one will ever find, because they are purely 'science fiction' introduced in order to fit new more precise observations into the incorrect big bang model. Best regards, David Hine Hi. It's interesting that fixing Hubble's Constant has been moved to 'Speculations'. I am not disputing that, but to be properly 'scientific', so should the 'big bang' speculation. If it is not, I will feel at liberty to post in the cosmology section that carries 'big bang' speculations. Can anyone show 'big bang' is purely 'speculative?? David Hine. (my real name) Also, why do posters here hide behind 'aliases'?? We do this on Pirate Radio forums for obvious reasons, but why on a science forum?? Are they scared of being identified by other scientists? David Sorry, I meant to say (typo) "Can anyone show 'big bang' is not simply pure speculation? David

It does not relate because it's simply not happening. The latest Planck result takes it down from 73.52 to now 67. Going downwards the other way!!! Certainly not speeding up!! Purely acceptable measuring errors. They get it roughly right, but this proves measuring it is never exact. It cannot ever be. The calculated 70.98047 is the exact unchanging Hubble value, David.

Moontanman, I forgot about the 'add' thing, So I apologise for that. The point is that this calculation now 'fixes' Hubble to its exact figure in modern metric units. It' very similar to when Maxwell 'fixed' by maths light speed, C, while others measured it with rotating mirrors etc. The measuring methods (by default) will never exactly agree, but were near enough to prove we have the speed of light, and Maxwell got it right. Now we have Hubble's slightly varying measured values, and now its precise 'fixed' calculated value of 70.87047 kilometres per sec per meg parsec. That's the first point. As 70.98047 never changes over time, its reciprocal of 13.778 billion light years is not the age of the universe, but 'The Hubble Horizon Distance' only. That's the second point, David. I made a typo. Hubble is always 70.98047, David

Hi, There is now a very simple way to calculate Hubble's Constant, by inputting to an equation, the numerical value of Pi and the speed of light (C) from Maxwell's equations and the value of a parsec. NO space probe measurements (with their inevitable small measuring / interpretation errors) are now required. Hubble's Constant is 'fixed' at 70.98047 PRECISELY. This maths method removes the errors / tolerances that is always a part of attempting to measuring something as 'elusive' as Hubble's Constant. To save you labouring through Astrogeometry, the Hubble 'fixing' equation is :- 2 X by a meg parsec X by light speed (C). This is then divided by Pi to the power of 21. This gives Hubble's Constant as 70.98047 kilometres per second per meg parsec precisely. The reciprocal of 70.98047 is 13.778 billion light years. As 70.98047 never changes over time, 13.778 is not the age of the universe. It's simply 'The Hubble Horizon Distance' The explanation and equation to perform this can be found in a book I've been told over and over again not to advertise here.

The equation that gives that' fixes' Hubble's Constant at 70.98047 is :- 2 multiplied by a meg parsec then multiplied by the speed of light (C). this is then divided by Pi to the power of 21. This is the one and ONLY value of Hubble. If you do not understand this, I will be happy to email you in a sensible way. My email address is in Some Book on Amazon Kindle Books. Hubble's Constant is actually as 'fixed' in value as Pi. To believe anything else is fake. This simple fact actually proves the 'big bang' hypothesis is fake. A universe 'explosion' joke was put forward by Rev. Lemaitre around 1927 as a wind up JOKE in the Hubble revelations of that time -and the 'so called' scientists ('suckers') have believed it ever since -an even BIGGER joke!! The Very Rev. Lemaitre had a rather 'twisted John Cleese' type sense of humour, and was ridiculing all those who do not believe our Father, Lord Jesus Created the universe in 6 of 24 hour days. Lemaitre saw his joke backfire, and tried in 1936 to retract it for the total rubbish it is. Of course, the secular 'fools' are still fooled by it to this very day!! It was Fred Hoyle who gave the 'big bang' that 'insulting' name through his utter contempt of it. Rev. Lemaitre simply called it an explosion (for fun). Rev. Lemaitre was a devout Roman Catholic Christian Priest, who believed the truth of Creation as described in the K. J. Genesis account. You should do too, David. Meet the only alien you will ever find. He was spotted lurking in the dark shadows of Harrow Bus station.

Hi, There is now a very simple way to calculate Hubble's Constant, by inputting to an equation, the numerical value of Pi and the speed of light (C) from Maxwell's equations and the value of a parsec. NO space probe measurements (with their inevitable small measuring / interpretation errors) are now required. Hubble's Constant is 'fixed' at 70.98047 PRECISELY. This maths method removes the errors / tolerances that is always a part of attempting to measuring something as 'elusive' as Hubble's Constant. The reciprocal of 70.98047 is 13.778 billion light years. as 70.98047 never changes, 13.778 is Not the age of the universe, but the 'Hubble Horizon Distance' only. The equation to perform this can be found in ?