controversialEngineer

do you know the measurements involved? the size of an electron and the width of the divider between the slits? i picture shooting a pellet gun at the length of a battleship...

not sure that answers my question. an electron is extremely small in comparison to a single hydrogen atom. how can we possibly produce a barrier small enough to appear as two slits in comparison to the electron? aren't electrons made of quarks and energy? can we isolate an electron in a vacuum without adding energy to the electron?

thank you for responding, i will respond in the order of your inquiries. they are no longer receding from us, hubble's graph implies that the velocity of everything at time 0, now, is 0. this was referenced in the file, V(0) = 0 on the graph. we are not the center of the universe, the plot has us at the origin because that is where we are measuring from. the oldest velocities are the fastest and decrease as time moves forward. gravity, just as the pre-hubble theories have suggested. i have not seen data suggesting any galaxy moving faster than light, just close to C. i don't understand the question - the acceleration implied in the graph is constant. we see no galaxies beyond 14 billion years ago, just large clouds of energy condensing into galaxies. as far as i understand, the big bang suggest all energy/mass was condensed into a singular point. the referenced video shows all the energy evenly distributed and is in the process of condensing into galaxies, which is my understanding of the hubble data. do you agree that distance is proportional to negative time?

please review my 4 page document and reply. EVC.doc

what are the dimensions of the double slits in comparison to the electron? what keeps the electron from decaying outside the environment of an atom long enough to run the experiment? how are the electrons detected before and after the slits?