Layers

How is the composition of nebulae different which gives birth to stars. How exactly does that happen and how's that different than jupiter. Thanks

Jupiter is made of hydrogen and helium or so I learned. These are the same gases present in the sun. Why doesn't jupiter explode or give birth to starts as nebulae do. Jupiter has even been supplied ignition several times when comets hit it and explode. Why doesn't the entire planet explode then. Another question, in absolute zero temperature and vacuum conditions, given enough time, can any gases or other organic material produce itself.

I am keen to get the answer as to what is the Difference between gas composition of nebulae and gas planets like jupiter. Why doesn't jupiter explode or create stars like nebulae do. Do nebulae have something else going that gives birth to stars.

Asking questions is a way of learning. Accountancy is not just about adding. That's elementary mathematics. And 2+2 is always 4. In most mathematics and science of the universe, it is theories, and often, different ones, and approximations and assumptions. Still if someone challenged me in accountancy, I will ask him to explain. That way, I may still learn something myself.

Thanks for mentioning. The link gives no information. It seems to a login protected site, if there is anything in it. And I do want to understand. Remember, I'm an Accountant. I'm a little uninformed. I'm not criticizing. Never studied science or advanced mathematics but I am determined to learn all that's therr. That's why I am inviting comments from learned people like you and I appreciate. So far I'm sure of my theory but I want to learn more than I could do by watching several dozens of videos on youtube. I did the same when I wrote the first ever theory of Love and Hate, that applies to every love or hate situation and has a mathematical formula to compute it in my book What is Love? Please forgive my current temporary ignorance on advance mathematical or scientific models of the universe and things in it. Hi thanks for writing. I respectfully disagree with the article which I have read and the accompanying video that I saw. Most of the comments on the video too don't agree with the explanation. I'm also saying this because the theory I am working on doesn't have this anomaly that speed limit is applicable to things travelling near you under special relativity but things afar need not follow the limit under general relativity which the article says. Thanks.

It also disproves Einstein's assertion that nothing can travel faster than light. The time taken for universe to expand during this time is way faster than even light. Any explanation of that?

Thanks Strange. I will be studying these. I have also been studying the links you provided. I came across this nasa which I am studying. site wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe Unlike most of you. I have not studied physics, cosmology or advanced mathematics but I am learning as I come across material because, I do believe I have something to contribute. As I mentioned, once I started thinking, I have decoded elements of love or hate involved for any person, pet, object, cause or spirit with a mathematical formula. The elements and formula is same in every case. I have a book and App explaining this. Hopefully, I will write my book on my theory of the universe and spirituality too before James Webb telescope starts working next year.

Perhaps, you are right that I consider it logical because it makes sense to me, but I hope it will make sense to others too and perhaps they can come up with more scientific proof. This is what happened a lot of times in the past with respect to many theories some of which didn't even sound logical at the time they were proposed. On the other hand there were/are competing theories that make sense through mathematical proof but will never be able to be proved. For example, the string theory and existence of multiverse:and if somehow it is somehow proved, BBT will automatically be disproved.

Thanks for your views. I am not disappointed but fascinated and happy that it is not exact science since I have developed an alternative theory which is none of the existing ones. Since, I believe it's logical, it would be considered scientific too although I don't present it this way. However, if I did find incontrovertible proof of the BBT, I would need to give up my theory. As regards infinity of the space always without a beginning or end, I think I will present some scientific proof too. Thanks

Thanks for your reply. I'm willing to understand all evidence but haven't found incontrovertible evidence of the theories of big bang, size, age of universe and some related concepts. I am looking for answers to the specific questions I asked from anyone who knows.

Friends, I am an accountant, MBA. I have worked for over 2 decades in corporate world including as CFO and CEO. I thought there were only 2 things humans had not yet been able to define correctly or measure. Love and the size of the universe. I defined love (or hate) for any person, pet, object, cause or spirit with the same 3 conditions and provided a mathematical formula to measure the love (or hate) in my book called "What is Love? Formula for all Relationships." Now I am working on to define the actual origin of the universe and measuring its size, and some related subjects. I think I can propose a different theory than big bang for the origin of the universe and PROVE with multiple scientific logics that the universe (the space) is and has always been infinite. It has no beginning and no end. There will be much more including on dark matter, dark energy, Einstein's equations, etc. I have not been able to find the exact computations of the age of the universe calculated by the proponents of the big bang theory - 13.7 billion years. Nor, how they says that for first 380000 years universe was opaque. (not that knowing the computational would have changed the alternative theory I have but I would like to know how exactly these statements are made by scientists. If you have anything specific that doesn't agree with the current accepted theories, I would love to understand your views. Thank you. Vijay S Sharma