You did not understand. Using plastic isnt option, but for example iron. As the fake receptors dissolve in time, iron is nutrient for the body.
As we mix just small ppm to the iron with hydrogen, it causes it to become good to dissolve in time.
"Because of its lability when removed from a hydrogen atmosphere, it has no uses as a structural material. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron%E2%80%93hydrogen_alloy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_hydride
Yes, that might a very problematic. But if we think the patient is dying at very fast rate, would it be lethal when the other systems included with receptors: are disturbed for a moment?
When all the viruses have been deactivated, the receptors would soon disintegrate: and as they lose the structure, they cannot anymore interact with the other mechanisms of the body, with receptors.
Maybe we can develop a special fake receptor, that is somehow different: then in normal cells, but it would be enough same: for the virus.
Yes, and thats why the word "vaccine" is with "" in the topic subject. As this does not fool the human immune system, as nowadays vaccines do, but fools the virus.
I am sorry to hear that. Unfortunately english isnt my native language, so you must have patience with it.
Why would I not want credit for the invention? As someone would try this idea, maybe it would work like a charm?
I also have other inventions for example in microalgae industry and waste facility. So therefore I want to encourage the world also, to use these other inventions as they are also published free and open source science.
Best way to fight diseases would be to improve hygiene in poor countries and best for the immunesystem there: would be have enough nutrients from food.
Is there a reason why you think that? Or is it just prejudice, when something new happens you cannot explain?
If you have a reason why you think like that, then it isnt prejudice. It would be great if you would clarify this for us which one it is.
I already have asked about this invention from allover finland. I am also here to ask, has this been laready invented/is there a obvious reason why it would not work?
If you have a reason to think why this invention is silly, thats why I am here: so you can tell me the reason. If no-one in whole world cant tell me reasons why this would not work, guess some pharma will soon try to test it and hope it will help to save human lifes.