Jump to content

lentonenhenri

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lentonenhenri

  1. I think 3D technology is so young, that it will take big leaps and cannot be predicted yet, of what it is capable of. "Printing with sound: Researchers use acoustic forces to print droplets that couldn’t be printed before" https://www.seas.harvard.edu/news/2018/08/printing-with-sound -- I am aware, that 3D printing metals is still very hard, even with big particles. Here is some info about current state of that: https://3dprinting.com/metal/types-of-metal-3d-printing/ Maybe. At some point the recovery would be too late, even if the infection would stop instant. Point is, that if we adapt fake receptors in the first symptoms: we could maybe prevent the virus, taking over the body. If we have a deadly virus that is aggressive, one problem is how we can kill all the viruses in the body even What would you then call it? I didnt know biomolecules are used in that way. No one in finnish science forums either. I will investigate this if it is the same, what I am proposing. Why do you think the blog is here fro clicks? I am sure, I get for finnish blog: more clicks in finland, than foreign countries. The blog is simply there as it is my name and all. If moderators choose this could be avoided, then I should remove it and just add my name somewhere here. Also, can you provide some links where we can learn about biomolecules study with soluble receptor? If I understood right with fast reading, it isnt same I was proposing: but instead uses whole cell, as "fake receptor". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC22739/
  2. You did not understand. Using plastic isnt option, but for example iron. As the fake receptors dissolve in time, iron is nutrient for the body. As we mix just small ppm to the iron with hydrogen, it causes it to become good to dissolve in time. "Because of its lability when removed from a hydrogen atmosphere, it has no uses as a structural material. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron%E2%80%93hydrogen_alloy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_hydride Yes, that might a very problematic. But if we think the patient is dying at very fast rate, would it be lethal when the other systems included with receptors: are disturbed for a moment? When all the viruses have been deactivated, the receptors would soon disintegrate: and as they lose the structure, they cannot anymore interact with the other mechanisms of the body, with receptors. Maybe we can develop a special fake receptor, that is somehow different: then in normal cells, but it would be enough same: for the virus. Yes, and thats why the word "vaccine" is with "" in the topic subject. As this does not fool the human immune system, as nowadays vaccines do, but fools the virus. I am sorry to hear that. Unfortunately english isnt my native language, so you must have patience with it. Why would I not want credit for the invention? As someone would try this idea, maybe it would work like a charm? I also have other inventions for example in microalgae industry and waste facility. So therefore I want to encourage the world also, to use these other inventions as they are also published free and open source science. Best way to fight diseases would be to improve hygiene in poor countries and best for the immunesystem there: would be have enough nutrients from food. Is there a reason why you think that? Or is it just prejudice, when something new happens you cannot explain? If you have a reason why you think like that, then it isnt prejudice. It would be great if you would clarify this for us which one it is. I already have asked about this invention from allover finland. I am also here to ask, has this been laready invented/is there a obvious reason why it would not work? If you have a reason to think why this invention is silly, thats why I am here: so you can tell me the reason. If no-one in whole world cant tell me reasons why this would not work, guess some pharma will soon try to test it and hope it will help to save human lifes.
  3. I am very about of open source science. Seriously. Thats why I dont apply patents, but publish free so everyone can benefit. How come, when the whole ecosystem is collapsing: including human gut microbes, that money is made and not science to benefit all? Corruption in this case, simply means: the original idea has been distorded. Thats why I released my invention of new generation "vaccine". Its "vaccine" since it does not fool the human immune system, but fools the virus. As the virus is launched, it is connected to receptor in cell. As we 3D-print these fake receptor pieces and inject them into bloodstream: most of viruses become harmless, as they launch the system not inside the cell but outside the cell. It might come, that we dont have to print the whole receptor: but just a piece of that, so the virus would be fooled to launch itself. Also material used must contain hydrogen, as one part of the receptor intake is connected to electricity. Therefore, metal alloy used in this would have to be contained in hydrogen atmosphere, which would also increase the costs. Nevertheless, the idea itself is simple and should be tested if it works. You have to read the whole explanation including materials that maybe can be used in this, here in finnish: http://lentonenhenri.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/260184-uuden-sukupolven-rokote-ilmaiseksi Here is the most important link of to be considered: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-smallest-object-created-using-a-3D-printer
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.