Kartazion

Yes but I don't know why yet, because we have the ground state in the false vacuum (our vacuum) and we also have the ground state in the true vacuum even lower in energy (metastability zero-point energy). Ok. Here's the part I'm interested in. But in the case of a harmonic oscillation, wouldn't the probability distribution be uniform according to x? I don't understand why we have a better chance of finding the particle at the extremities. This is why I chose the anharmonic oscillator. There's a relationship between potential energy and distribution that I need to understand. Or not.

For the atomic nucleus I don't know. But the electron can use quantum tunnelling and pass the potential barrier from the false to the true vacuum. In the QFT the Higgs potential determines whether the Universe is in one of a true vacuum, or a false vacuum. Doesn't the ground state represent the lowest energy level of an atom? And so at the bottom of the well at x=0? So that a large value of n could bring the energy to the highest in the well? Ok. We have a better chance of finding the particle at the extremities than in the center of the well.

The true vacuum? But the energy and thus the principal quantum number n follow the shape of the potential well? https://www.academia.edu/8950511/Molecular_Quantum_Mechanics_4th_ed_ATKINS-FRIEDMAN

For fun; one could create an oscillator of the electron of a hydrogen atom with the variation of the wavelength of a laser assimilated to the electronic layers. This variation could be done between the false vacuum (surely the ground state) and the highest excited state of the potential well. Without ionization of course. As an output we could then study the Rydberg wave packet. The question is, why, or in what sense would this be a classic solution approach when we have a big n? Thanks.

Isn't that the Rydberg atom principle? With a high n value?

That begs the question:

I've only been in the study phase for a few weeks. It is difficult for me to follow everything as mathematical evidence. What is the reference that I should have followed in order to be able to talk about the probability of presence of the particle? Thanks for the tip. It's a great document as a whole, but it's highly quantum.

I wanted, with the wave function, to exploit the classical presence form of the particle as the electron in a hydrogen atom at different energy levels such as 4,3,3 I remind you that I'm a novice and I haven't figured it all out yet. So I think I'm going in the wrong direction to explain this, with a classical particle ; or not.

To show the probability of the presence of the particle.

Can we associate a wave function with a classical oscillator system?

Also deuterium. I forgot it is an isotope of hydrogen. sorry

Is there a relationship between the length contraction and a squeezed coherent state?

How many viruses does it take, in number of copies, to infect the human body? Several? Or just one virus alone is enough to infect the body?

These traces of the virus, even weak, show that Covid-19 is present in the Seine and the Ourcq canal.

That's not sewage right there. But this is clean water to clean the streets of Paris contains virus.

What do you think about that ? 'Minuscule traces' of virus in non-potable Paris water

Strange, do you agree with that: You are therefore more likely to find the particle at its ends, than between. Because the anharmonicity is focused on the stop of the particle at its ends, unlike, where between two, its acceleration is very fast.

Proteins are molecules made up of a chain of amino acids. You can go see in the composition. It might give you some clues.

I think we’re talking about genome and proteins. To check. I have this complete list from The New York Times. It's for beginners like me. But I think it's very well done. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/03/science/coronavirus-genome-bad-news-wrapped-in-protein.html

The problem also applies to the asymptomatic adult carriers. We'll have to test every one of us. As Many as 50 Percent of People with covid-19 Aren’t Aware They Have the Virus. See even Over 75% of people with covid-19 are asymptomatic.

That hidden viruses of the immunity could constitute a viral reservoir, and the immune defense no longer reach viruses. This viral reactivation is a possibility still under investigation.

This means that covid-19 can make a viral rebound and be reactivated in the case of a person who is already a carrier. The vaccine won't provide a solution if the virus is hiding. The vaccine will only be effective if the person has never had the virus, right? I found this in addition to info:

I had omitted that the term evolution was a specific stage reserved for the discipline of biology. I meant a database of immune memory that would be expanded and completed. I then discovered a strange organ because of its location in the body. The thymus. Here's what I could figure out. When the antigen is detected by the human body, it then produces lymphocytes ; B cells for antibodies, and T cells that destroy the infected cells. So why can't the immune system eradicate covid-19 in just a few moments? It's overwhelmed by the virus? Because the vaccine is giving the body time to prepare a sufficient number of antibodies? I hope I'm not off topic.

I meant to say making a synthetic antigen and injecting it into the patient so that his immune defense evolves. I see that it is very technical. Thank you again.

It was in 1930 in the United States that the first disease caused by a coronavirus was observed in poultry. It was in 1965 that the first coronavirus infecting humans (strain B814) was discovered. Act with the synthetic antigen to identify the virus in all its aspects? Will the immune response be effective in causing the production of special proteins for covid-19?