Jump to content

Phantom5

Senior Members
  • Posts

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Phantom5

  1. Since it did not work with zinc, I have something new to do, I test it with zinc, heat and vacuum. : D I suspect that perhaps the earth's resonance with the iron atoms harmonizes and that perhaps zinc atoms are hard to align. And that's why I want to make the zinc atoms vibrate. Heat destroys magnetic fields yes it would be interesting now what e.g. with steel and with heat and a vacuum, or just with zinc. So with zinc was absolutely no indication. It can also be seen that it is not due to the electromagnetic field of the pump. I have no video but who wants to see if the pump is the impact on the rash in the videos, then I upload a video.
  2. I'll try zinc with it today. I'll buy an Arduino in the future and I'll do more tests.
  3. Thanks, this is a good idea.
  4. What do you say of the last video?
  5. But it works.
  6. I have reached 10µT with the construction and at 5kPa.
  7. What is so bad about it? I can still do a summary in the end. I have reached with this construction 5kPa.
  8. I have done it again now and now with a vacuum gauge, I upload even more videos. I'm still trying to meet the specifications of Strange, so the experiment is still running and that's just one between results.
  9. So I took a tube where I stuck a piece of sheet metal on one side and a piece of wood on the side and in the tube I created a vacuum. Then I looked if a magnetic field is generated in the sheet metal. The whole thing I measured with the magnetic sensor of my phone, this is when you do a reset at 0.5 micro Tesla, in the first video you can see how the sensor 2-4 micro Tesla displays more and in the second video you can see how the App 0.5-1 micro Tesla more displays. In the first video, I measured from the front and in the second video, I put the phone on the plate. Is that ok? The whole thing would have to go with overpressure.
  10. The difference to the values that the phone normally displays, and I've always done a reset with the app. I measure with my mobile phone and the magnetic field sensor that shows me Tesla. I have where I held the tube in front of the phone about 2μT measured and where that cell phone on the tube was about 0.5 to 1 μT. You can see that in both videos as well. The next time I can connect a pressure sensor, but you just hear that has formed a complete vacuum because the vacuum pump is groaning. The vacuum pump creates 5Pa. The vacuum does not go through the wood and it is of course glued to the tube on it.
  11. Yes, much, it was only an idea.
  12. The difference in Tesla. It worked very well with wood, you can hear that the vacuum pump is on the Limit.
  13. Ok, I took a vacuum pump and a Plexiglas tube, on which I stuck a piece of beer cans on one side and a piece of wood on the other side. Then I measured the differences with and without a vacuum with a magnetometer app. Which would be interesting if you could make lead magnetic and then there is a lead magnetic field. This could be e.g. Shield radioactive radiation. This is of course only speculative and I'll do more tests.
  14. Hello I made an experiment where I tried to align atoms by vacuum and I was successful. Would you have thought that it works? My question is now you can also produce magnets made of copper which only attract Copper? Or Gold?Can it be that we only send ferromagnetic electricity over the lines? And there are other forms of electricity? Alone a magnet made of copper or gold would be very valuable.I have already ordered a very thin sheet of copper so I can test whether you can align copper atoms also. Here are the Pictures and the Videos... Here is a video, where, however, are not so strong rashes, presumably because the phone is on the tube.
  15. Here is the Video of the Experiment... Here the parts for the reactor and the finished reactor. The cathode after the test, it is from steel. When you want Details for the Experiment you can look here: http://jlnlabs.free.fr/cfr/diycfr/index.htm End at the end, i messeaurd 133 Wh of Output energy and the Input Energy is 141 Wh. So i dont have more Energy, as i put in it.
  16. By reflection. Then you take a smaller sphere where are only 100milligrams of hydrogen in it, then you dont need so much power. I don't understand the problem with the columb barrier you need only 10 Mev for overcome it, i think the temperature is the problem, but when you have pressure with radiation, then is 10Mev very tiny or im wrong? In Wh is it only 4.450492583333 *10^-16Wh. At 10^23 Atoms and 10Mev you Need only 44 Megawatts. Due to the law of conservation of momentum, any change in the total momentum of the waves or photons must involve an equal and opposite change in the momentum of the matter it interacted with (Newton's third law of motion), as is illustrated in the accompanying figure for the case of light being perfectly reflected by a surface. This transfer of momentum is the general explanation for what we term radiation pressure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure
  17. One mol of hydrogen are 2 grams and ive read here, see link, that 1 gram produce 90 Terrawatt Energy. The complete conversion of one gram of matter would release 9×1013 joules of energy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion Is it correct or wrong? When it prduce a Fusion effect, then it is a good reactor or not? Then you can produce with 100 Gigawatt, 90000 Gigawatt.
  18. I don't want to absorb the light, it must be a frequence, that, at it best, reflect the Atoms and then they are moving to the middle of the sphere. Sorry i think it was a misstake with the 10^36 Because of blow or push the Atoms in the middle of the sphere, i think when you have enough Radiation, then it gives a Fusion process. And when you take enough power you push all atoms in one second into the middle of the sphere. Because of the reflection, i hope that gives more thrust for the Atoms. With 100 Megawatts you push 2.5 x10^20 Atoms to the middle, but what is when you take 100 Gigawatts for one Second? I think that then all Atoms pushed in one second to the middle of the sphere or is it incorrect? 100GW would be 2.5x10^23. Would it reach for a Fusion?
  19. Hello Thanks for the answer. Hydrogen gas(H2) has a molar mass of 2 g. Molar mass of a substance is defined as the mass of 1 mole of that substance. And by 1 mole it is meant a collection of 6.022*10^23 particles of that substance. https://www.quora.com/How-many-molecules-are-present-in-one-gram-of-hydrogen-How Do you mean that you can push 2.5 10^12 Atoms/s with 1 Watt of light? What is when you have 2 gramms of hydrogen and you have 50 Watts? There are only 6.022*10^23 particels. Is it correct that you can push 2,5*10^36 Atoms with 100MW? And what i want to know, if you take a sphere with 10cm diameter and set on this sphere a frequence, maybe with 10khz and 60 watts, do you mean i can messure with a pressure change at the rim from the sphere? When you take 100MW then must the Atoms with one blow in the middle of the sphere or is that wrong?
  20. Hello I have an idea for a substance seperator or fusion reactor. Here is one example for my idea... We study the radiation pressure on cometary dust over a wide size range in order to discuss the properties of particles in cometary dust trails and meteor streams. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117707005376 The hydrogen line (1420.40575 MHz) is the precession frequency of neutral hydrogen atoms, the most abundant substance in space http://www.setileague.org/askdr/hydrogen.htm When you take a hollow sphere and set a frequency on it, then must the air in the sphere, compress it in the middle of it. You must find a frequency that push, maybe hydrogen in the middle of the sphere, but 1420MHz absorb hydrogen and i think that this is wrong. Also you take a frequency that pushs the hydrogen in the middle of the sphere. When its strong enough maybe it comes to a hydrogen fusion or you take normal air and take a frequency that push the oxygen in the middle of the sphere. And then you can take the oxygen away from the middle. What you think About it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.