peterwlocke

BIG DATA what is this plz explain?

here is a thought a computer needs a person to code it give it orders to do something and it cannot refuse. we can refuse orders even ingrained biological one. off topic i think you mean bags

yah i do use emulators most of the time a non profit called classic reload @CharonY and that is cool. it is not as slow as you old man @Sensei

was it future science

what one

baby dont hurt me no more.

yes, it is better to explain the truth as best as humanly possible than to be naive and to make fluffy scarecrow argument for a faith that has no wit or retheritoic. why do you think there are so many because people are gullable.

yes, the young shall inherit the earth hahaha. also, that is cool I have played it had a bit of trouble getting things done on it. it doesn't have a story but meh. i bet you where around when skeletor was not a meme. but yah i am trying to figure out the ui it is so archaic it susprises me that it is lit.

just got a laptop from the 90s that uses 3.5 compact floppy disks learning my way around it pretty fast if i do say so myself.

I don't see why they are saying these things it is like saying insert artist did not make a painting because they did not make the tools. now, Andrew, was instrumental forgive the pun but she did the final part/put it together and got it.

it is because they don't understand how the world works so they try to use gods to explain. or if they do they have had it ingrained since they could communicate. and that is a good point god can't be real if he is all merciful and created this world.

coolio.

yes. if sentience was somehow favored and a complex moral device and other things like misprocessing/not enough info led to human-like things.

i was looking at the previous and this is my hypothesis I have come to. that if there are many competing ai and if it is made so that sentinace is rewarded then maybe if given a lot of time. p.s. i am not able to prove it i am just arisotialing it.

it could be that their environment has one main problem that if they evolved otherwise it would hurt them or that the gene pool is really small and when mutations do happen they die for one reason or another without getting a chance to mate which I suppose would mean it is bad but idk. also, they could have changed just there fossils don't show all the features.

there were a few I saw that I was not one hundo on but I did not read the whole thing but the Schrodinger thing is meant to disprove it. honestly, it kind of reminds me of me a person who wants to sound smart but does not know all the facts/does little research.

e

I have not been paying complete attention to all that you say but (correct me if I am wrong) this violates something that has been proven energy cannot be created or destroyed so where is it coming from.

it is an animation, not a model and to "prove" something without making it you either have to have the equations to back it up and let us know how it lines up with popular views on physics/proven laws of physics. I am interested but I would like to see something that really proves it.

I did not say God was good in my first post you brought it up actually and look at all the bad things that have been done in gods name even the bible has some bad stuff in it it is an outdated way of thinking.

It is, but it has done more bad than good.

well, you have a point there why would God be bound to the same laws as us. I will think of a reason but my reply for know is idk.

I am no brain expert but how are you going to make the person stop moving because you need to send the "moving signals" to move because you can't really imagine moving your arm to do it because the signals are probably different. also, it is not easy to measure brain signals look at the machines they have to use to it now for brain skills and motor functions. not to mention you would have to make a bunch of custom stuff. like software and parts. sorry if I did not articulate my thoughts well.

conservation of mass-energy by Antione Lavoisier then built upon to be the first law of thermodynamics by Julius Robert Mayer. says (paraphrasing) that nothing can poof into existent so how could God be real if he just creates stuff. at least the big bang comes from a super dense point. p.s. you made it sound like I believe in god(which I don't).

first, you have to give us more info. but any definition of god I have heard cannot be true. like the there was nothing then there was nothing if god was real it would line up with our laws and most likely with the vast majority of our theories on how the world works which he does not. but if someone can tell me how I would love to hear. also when someone says stuff, like I am a believer, can sci prove/disprove they don't change their view they become defensive.