Kennytek00

This is just a theory, and I don't know if anyone else has come up with it. My theory is about how time travel relies upon the multiverse being a reality. The Multiverse is pretty self explanatory, in that for each and every outcome of an incident another universe is created. Meaning there could quite possibly be a universe where dinosaurs still exist and the Nazis won WWII. For time travel to exist though there must first be a multiverse, this way a paradox won't create an absolute ending. A great example is the grandfather paradox, in which someone goes back in time and kills their grandfather, But if they do that they were never born, which then means they weren't able to go back in time and kill their grandfather. with the multiverse it would still break that universe, but it would not destroy the space/time continuum. At the same time though, time travel does not have to be possible for the multiverse to exist.

Sorry for the delayed response, I got to busy to find time to come respond. Out of curiosity what do you think is the best method of solving the problem, while trying to avoid war?

So you're suggesting to allow Russia into NATO, which was designed mainly for North Atlantic countries (I don't know if Russia qualifies as a North Atlantic country, and if it is this makes perfect sense), but there is also SEATO (South East Asian Treaty Organisation) that could also be a viable option. I do not know if SEATO has been as successful as NATO, but it could also be an option. My main question though is what should be done with the current land the Russians have taken from Ukraine, because I highly doubt they will willingly give up land that gives them access to warm water ports. It will harm their economy, and limit their trading options again. Yet at the same time allowing the Russians to keep the land sets a precedence very similar to what was done with Germany prior to World War II, so only telling them to not do something and then not follow through with what was said allows them to continuously keep toeing the line and getting away with more. This is quite obviously a case of where if you give the Russians an inch, they'll take a mile. So if you could suggest a method of where both parties benefit, without causing a war, that would help with clarification.