Xavier Zapotny
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Xavier Zapotny
-
Also as I’ve said on my own page. Unless we can have a reasonable conversation without throwing insults or childish remarks such as me being high. Do not bother commenting. As I’ve explained there is no need to go off and say stuff like that due to my age and lack of degree. Sure so what if grammar is not my greatest. But it’s not cool to pull stereotypes. End of story. Ok?
-
high? Are you for real? I don’t smoke, drink, or do drugs. Just because of my age you make such assumptions. I’m perfectly clear minded. I may not have the best grammar but that doesn’t mean I’m high.
-
Fair point I’ll admit. But if these are factors and he defects why don’t the others? I mean regardless of the fear factor. Doesn’t it seem odd based on the event? Here I’ll post a video of his escape. But you have to know, a Korean can be a better marksman. Think back at every war. In general not just the Korean. We as Americans would know very little other than the spoon fed things we here on the media or based on observation and disregarding the media on what it says verse what we see.
-
On the theory of relativity one were you referring to me or the other on the comment that it has nothing to do with the light speed?
-
Sorry first time using this thing. How does one respond back to the repost? I’m not the greatest with technology.... and to answer your question no I’m not using a translator
-
Go to your thread: https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/117559-theory-of-relativity/ and click "Quote" under the post you want to reply to.
-
-
Can you provide me evidence of the claim as in an accurate description of the date and time alongside the results of this testing? I’d love to look at the results and see what they did. I’m just curious based on the aspect of the momentum with physics applied as a general tool to know if one thing came into collision with another object in its path it would slow down or have to get around it or will bounce off into another direction. Because clearly depending on the object it collides with based on mass and size as well as other key components it will not simply dissolve nor destroy the object to barrel through will it.
-
Just because I am young, please do not discriminate nor discredit me based on my lack of a degree and position in life. I am quite capable with what I say in the area of understanding. If you wish to speak or debate do so logically and don’t be a child on how you act in a debate please. I don’t like trolls and if you troll me I can’t promise you I won’t shut you down with psychological and social measures without meaningless pathetic insults
-
My question that I want to see based on simple observation to see how many besides I thought this. But is North Korea and South Korea actually separated by reality in a psychological standard rather than one of physicality, or are they working as one with a barrier for play? My reasoning for this question is because through simple observation I’ve noticed oddities between the two that don’t add up. They say they hate each other right? Then why is it when the defector OH was running. One. Koreans are better marksman, two. If you watch the footage alone and look closely. They are missing purposely. It’s like those movies where setups take place. They had to hit the guy to make it look real. They hit an area where he could be healed and knew where an issue was. The question remains, why did he defect? What do we know about what happened prior? And why did S. Korea take him in give him full rights full treatment. And no problems based on suspicion of him being there. He was brought in full acceptance. Whereas Americans cannot even accept a slightest refuge if Mexican without any hint of discrimination or mistrust? Second observation. The music is referred to as K-Pop, why not NK-Pop vs SK-Pop if they hate each other so much. Then take into account the differentiations in the language. It is different enough to seem plausible they separated but can still converse and understand. Tactics used as a hidden reference to what can be seen as hidden measures of what they want others to think. Back to the question as a closing. What do you all think. Are they truly separated. Or not?
-
Does anyone else have any thought in Einstein’s theory of relativity being a possibility of a mere joke to have others think? I can already think of a scientific experiment to disprove how you can fabricate his idea of The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or of the motion of the light source. if one was to use a tank filled with different types of liquids for the viscosity to find a substance equal to the particles in space, a prism for direction and a flashlight. My thought is to warp the idea by the angles alone. Take for example the objects in space. Would the light travel through them? Or would it bend in angle. I understand it meant in a vaccuum but that’s why I used the idea of warpation by the differences in the viscosities to find a similarity. Can we disprove that light will be the same speed based on what is said without a model of representation? This is my thought on it. If you put the first experiment at hand to disprove the aspect of the rebound to slow the light down due to collision off of objects into different angles. Would a vaccum if tampered with By technology have the same effect in general to disprove the idea alone.