graybear13

create a large vortex above the pyramid spinning at the speed of the pyramid. A pyramid sized to create a 10ft. diameter vortex spinning at 6,000rpm will produce wind speeds of around 2,000 mph. For this to work thermodynamically the pyramid must be hot and being hit by cold air. Ionized gas is injected into the system up through the hollow axel and out two opposite walls of the pyramid. The ionized gas will help form the large vortex as it is influence by the spinning magnetic field at the peak of the pyramid. Then create a second Pyramid Vortex Generator with opposite spin. Aim the two vortexes at each other. They will join together and continue to collapse forming an accretion disk, all collapsing into a larger and larger mass. The result will be more and more gravity, pressure and heat potentially resulting in a fusion reaction. A growing gravity bubble will form in earth's gravity field surrounding the system. Everything inside of the bubble will be weightless and experience zero G-force while moving around in earth's atmosphere.

The only thing that can save us from completely destroying the atmosphere is to overcome earth's gravity beyond rockets, wings and wheels. Pyramid Vortex Generator Gravity Machine: This experiment will show how nothing becomes something and it will demonstrate how gravity is the beginning of matter and is the glue that holds matter together. It will also create a containment vessel for a fusion reaction. Start with a steel pyramid of some scaled down dimensions of the great pyramid of Giza with an electro magnet at its peak. Then mount it on a hollow shaft and spin it. Now shoot a jet of air at the spinning pyramid. The faces of the pyramid, as they pass the jet of air, will act as air foils creating a vortex; the same as the air foil on top of a wing in forward motion creates a vortex. If you surround the spinning pyramid with jets of air aimed at it, you will produce vortexes collapsing toward the peak of the pyramid. When allof the vortexes come together they will cre

My initial assumptions are correct and my logic is sound. With all due respect, dependence on mathematics as the only way to move forward is a big part of the problem with physics. A little bit of common sense is what is needed. It's as if we have given up the ability to visualize a way forward. Math has led us into a blind ally with nothing ahead but a dead end. I don't have the ability to speak the language of mathematics, but I can see how math was used to create a primeval atom that Einstein went along with, reversing his math in time to eventually send us chasing wild geese up a blind ally. Big bang is BS (bad science). So there will be no math. I can prove what I say to be true by experiment, but there is no interest (yet) in funding experiments that could prove big bang to be BS. I know I am in the land of giants who believe that I have come to steal the goose that lays golden eggs (big bang). Not so. I have come to show you how to access unlimited clean energy, but it will take a major rewire of the current thinking about a few things. Thank you for the insult. It means a lot coming from someone who thinks that if you jump out of an airplane you become weightless. If that were the case you wouldn't need a parachute to keep earth's gravity from smashing you like a bug when you hit the ground. Linear gravity is the movement of neutrinos through your body pushing you down if you are in the air, on the ground or in a cavern under the ground. The charged protons and uncharged neutrons of the nucleus of an atom are held together by the reciprocating force of the Mesotron. If Mesotron is destroyed this will facilitate all sorts of atomic breakup and material disintegration

I will start with a few axioms that will justify my logic First and foremost is a quote from Albert Einstein " We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that we used when we created them." Second, there is no evidence of a gravitational attraction between masses. Third, dark matter is not matter at all. It is a field of pre-atomic emergent energy particles (neutrinos). Finally there was no big bang that started atomic creation. Atomic creation started with zero point energy (neutrinos) organizing themselves, through gravitational collapse and electronic organization into atoms. Heat is a byproduct of atomic activity built up over billions of years. The cosmos is much older than we think. At this point in time science sees no connection between neutrinos and atoms. I posit that there is the ultimate connection in that atoms are electronically organized neutrinos. Why else would neutrinos be given off when atoms break down for one reason or another? The process of organizing neutrinos into atoms is the missing piece of the puzzle. How does a flow of neutrinos collapse and condense to the point at which an active nucleus is created? And once an active nucleus begins to project a positive charge, how is that contained and supported by the flow of neutrinos? Every atom of a mass exerts a pull on the field of neutrinos to feed its atomic activity. We know that neutrinos have no direct influence on the atoms of a mass as they pass through, but there is an indirect push or nudge on the atoms of, for example, my body because they pull in neutrinos that are moving toward earth in order to feed and support their active nuclei. If the flow of neutrinos stops, the nucleus will die. The experiment to measure the nudge on my atoms is the easiest experiment in the world, just hop on a scale. The result of a 100 trillion (or so) tiny nudges per second is your weight. If we can find a way to feed the atoms of our bodies from a source of neutrinos that are not moving toward earth there would be no nudge toward earth on each of my atoms therefore I would weightless in relation to earths gravitational field. How to create a warp in the flow of dark matter that can redirect the flow of neutrinos toward the center of the warp is a problem that can be solved with this 'new way of thinking' about gravity. In my view the missing neutrinos coming from the sun is equal to the number of neutrinos that are absorbed by the planet and the life on it. All of which must be fed energy in order to continue to exist. Neutrinos are raining down on earth from outer space ( dark matter), riding in on light beams from the sun and cycling through atoms; negative charge pulling them in and positive pushing them out. The flow of neutrinos being incessantly pulled in by a mass is linear gravity.

I do not think you should assume anything about me. Whether or not I understand the math is not relevant. I understand, from what I have read, that Einstein said "it is ridiculous to suggest a moment of creation from a primeval atom", but the Catholic church's priest Lamaitre, with the help of Edwin Hubble, convinced Einstein to change his way of thinking. This led directly to BBT and now you say that BBT has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. I guess you have to deny the primeval atom/singularity in the end, but that leaves BBT without meaning. Something from nothing doesn't really work. Einstein was on the right track until his way of thinking was changed by Hubble and Lamaitre. I do not have to be able to do the math to see the difference between exploding from nothing into creation and PEE slowing down and collapsing and then exploding into creation. The universe is a lot older than is predicted by BBT. For all we know our local universe may expand and contract over hundreds of billions of years It probably depends on how the PEE is moving. The atomic universe is drifting and moving within the PEE.

Yes. I saw the connection in the 1982 form of the experiment. I was shinning lights at a spinning mirror pyramid and I saw the spinning effect that was caused by the light reflecting off of the passing pyramid walls. Later I had some success with making the transition to a thermodynamic spinning effect in atmosphere. If the experiment were to move forward, any suggestions on how best to create the vortex thermodynamically should certainly be considered. I do not have a strong vortex in my hand because I have not been able to control the variables; temperatures, air pressures and rate of spin. Not to mention electromagnetism and ionized gasses. regards, gray When I have a vortex that I can control, then I can have two vortexes that I can control. When I force them to join at their tips, If the spheres form, that is the framework of the genesis particle. The spinning pyramid is the cause of the vortexes. I never said that I doubted the value of mathematics in physics. I did say that I dismiss the mathematics behind the big bang theory of creation because it is backwards and wrong headed. That is what my threat is about, creation. When I attack the big bang b.s. I am not attacking the standard model unless the big bang is part of the standard model. regards, gray

Thank you for your questions Ghideon. Yes, it is the same gravity as measured by mainstream science. No conflict, just a new understanding. a new way of thinking. The disturbance in space-time that has been accepted by mainstream science needs to be defined and then connected to all of these measurements. I am sure they will interface nicely. All of the standard model derives from the transfer of energy from PEE field into the electronic organization of matter. The Genesis particle is the conductor/conduit of PEE. If this experiment creates strong gravity, that would be some new stuff. I believe that the creation will seem to be anti gravity, but it is really just gravity creating it's own reality (disturbance) in space-time. If the Genesis particle manifests and continues compressing the air, the enhanced gravity could become strong enough to ignite a fusion reaction and contain it. That would be some new stuff. When an atom performs radioactively it degrades its own genesis particle giving up PEE particles. This explains why, when atoms perform radioactively, they emit far more energy than would be expected. This excess of radiation comes from the breaking up of the Genesis particle. regards, gray

The shape of a pyramid is the only shape that will create a dip in the air flow across it's face when spinning against an opposing air mass. The shape and tilt of the pyramid wall will determine the shape and tilt of the vortex created. The dimensions of the great pyramid of Cheops, it seems to me, are best suited to create a spiral vortex. I don't know. It seemed like a good place to start. I think that the pyramid should be the magnet. I don't know that spheres will manifest, but that is one of the objectives of the experiment; what will happen when two vortexes push against each other's push to continue collapsing and condensing? Again, I don't know, but I would like to find out if a new structure will appear. One that will increase the gravity of the two vortexes. All good questions. Thank you for your interest. regards, gray Thank you for your interest. I played with a spinning pyramid for a long time as a hobby while I pursued my career as a professional land surveyor. I injected the pyramid with cold air into hot air outside of the spinning pyramid. When I realized that I needed to inject the pyramid with hot air into cold air outside, that is when I ran out of money. My shade tree engineering failed and I stopped experimenting with the machine I built. From the time I first saw the vortexes form on the spinning pyramid in 1982 until now, 36 years. It will take some good engineering and science, neither of which I can provide, to make it happen. How long will it be until someone is willing to fund this project? I don't know. After that pretty quick I think. regards, gray

Thank you for your interest Ghideon. This experiment will demonstrate the structure of the genesis particle. A spinning pyramid (the great pyramid of Cheops is ideal for this experiment) mounted on a hollow shaft situated in a spinning magnetic field with hot ionized gas being injected up the shaft, through and out of the pyramid. The hot gas is ejected from opposite faces of the spinning pyramid where it is opposed by cold air. Because of the geometry of the spinning pyramid a low pressure area will form where the hot gas is exiting the pyramid and is directly opposed by cold air. This is similar to the principle of lift; the air passing over the wing dips because of the shape of the wing and forms a low pressure over the wing. There is a dip in the air flow as the face of the pyramid passes. The low pressure is a vortex. With four jets of air aimed at the spinning pyramid. four small vortexes will form and begin to feed into a larger vortex that will become embedded in the spinning magnetic field. As the vortex collapses it will pull in more and more gas creating stronger and stronger gravity resulting in increasing mass. Two vortexes with opposite spin(or the same spin ?) are joined at their tips. The strength of their gravity is increased by the formation of the reciprocating collapsing concentric spheres of the genesis particle. The formation of this framework of the genesis particle in the atmosphere will provide direct access to PEE and produce a strong gravitational field around itself. It will be interesting to see how earths gravitational field is affected by this system. I predict that the earth's gravity will be nullified in close proximity to the system. regards, gray

I am not challenging the standard model. I am just presenting my view of the rest of the story. Maybe my use of the word neutrino made you think that I was somehow challenging the standard model. I just picked the particle that fit my conception of the elementary particle of PEE. I admit that I do not posses the math skills to prove what I say is true, but I can prove it experimentally. This all started with me in 1982 when I designed a machine that will create gravity. And now, after some experimentation and evolution of thought, I believe I can create a genesis particle in atmosphere. gray

Wow! I dare to challenge your ridiculous nonsense story of creation with one that makes sense and you get your panties in a wad. You have spent billions of dollars trying to prove something that never happened. Shame on you. You took Einsteins math and reversed it in time and went off chasing a dream that was only supported by your wrongheaded backwards math. And you ended up with what? A singularity, that makes no mathematical sense, as your source of creation. You should have known that the whole way of thinking was bogus at that point and not conjured up the big bang nonsense that led to the biggest boondoggle in the history of the world, LHC. I really don't understand your arrogance on the issue of creation. Lets take a look at what you don't know. You don't know what gravity is. You don't know what energy is. You don't know what charge is. There is a lot more, but these are the big three. None if these are explained and defined by you big bang LIE. You cannot get to the final answer from where your thinking has taken you. Your math has boxed you into a corner. You have to look at it from a different perspective; COLLAPSING INTO CREATION, 'NOT', BLOWING UP INTO CREATION. When you look at it from that opposite thinking it will all fit together. I don't hold out much hope that scientists will be able to change their way of thinking, but it will only take a few to make the very difficult change and tie it all together from the outside looking at a collapse into the electronic organization of matter and creation. NO SINGULARITY. "We live in special times, when young and old are educated in a lie and he who dares to tell the truth, is called a madman or a fool" Plato, 320 BC regards, gray

This theory begins with an understanding of puissant emergent energy (PEE) that fills the content of space. It is an ocean of neutrinos in their natural state (no heat, no charge and beyond the speed of light) before they slow down and cycle through an atomic creation. When ejected from an atomic organization through some kind of atomic decay or disintegration, the neutrinos speed up and move back to their natural state. When the PEE slows and whirls into the electronic organization of matter, the incessant pull of gravity is created. Gravity is a pull on the PEE field by an electromagnetic atomic system. Neutrinos being pulled in and condensed into a nucleus is the negative charge (-). When the negative charge becomes strong enough, protons ignite with a positive charge(+) and emit light and hear radiation. Evidence of the existence of Puissant Emergent Energy (PEE) 1. Zero point energy is PEE. Scientists have proven the existence of this energy, but fail to recognize its power. It is difficult to imagine an energy field with zero heat and zero charge that is powerful enough to create, contain and maintain all atomic activity but it does exist. The fact is, PEE fills and dynamically energizes all of space-time that is not occupied by atomic activity. That is 96% PEE compared to 4% atomic activity and heat. 2. The discovery of neutrinos. They are direct evidence of PEE. 3. CMBR. This radiation, discovered in 1965, is PEE rays as they rain down on earth. 4. Dark energy and dark matter. These are just areas of higher or lower concentrations of neutrinos (PEE). A gravity warp pulls PEE in causing higher concentrations of neutrinos around matter = dark matter, while in some areas of deep space there may be only a few neutrinos per cubic meter = dark energy. 5. Spooky action action at a distance. Everything that happens within the PEE field is influenced by the PEE field. All atomic heat and activity is created by the field and is really nothing more than disturbances in the PEE field. 6. Gravitational waves. What, exactly, are these waves traveling through? Certainly not empty space. They are traveling through the PEE field. 7. The strong force. The gravitational condensation of PEE alone is not a powerful enough force to create and hold protons together in a nucleus. There is another force that enhances gravitational force to be able to hold the atom together. This force is collapsing concentric spheres that allow electrons to orbit the nucleus at different distances from the nucleus. This part of the atomic structure is very similar to the taurus. As PEE is moved toward the nucleus, electrons jump between orbits. I believe this is when photons are created. All of this is part of the negative charge (-). 8. Image of CMBR. These images show a tapestry of atomic energy overlaid on the PEE. Gravity. Gravity is not an attraction of one mass for another mass, it is the attraction that mass has for PEE. All atomic matter in the universe does not pull on all other matter in the universe, so there is no need for a cosmological constant, although I'm sure that the PEE acts as a cushion between atomic systems. Scientists like to use the bowling ball on a trampoline to demonstrate how gravity causes a warp in space-time. This thought experiment presents an over simplification of the warp in space-time(PEE) because it doesn't give a complete 3-dimensional representation of the warp. In this experiment the bowling ball causes the warp on the trampoline, but in reality, enhanced gravity causes the warp in the PEE that causes the mass, not the other way around. MASS DOES CREATE GRAVITY. GRAVITY CREATES MASS. This confusion causes scientists to have gravity at or near zero in the micro world when in reality the enhanced gravity that creates an atom is powerful enough to hold the system together. PEE plus vortical motion equals gravity. Any collapsing cloud of gas creates a gravitational pull on the source of particles. How does this simple condensation move from this relatively weak force to the power of collapsing concentric spheres? Lets say, the collapsing condensation is a black hole of PEE with the classic image of large diameter at the event horizon end and tapering down to a point, or tip, at the other end. Now take two black holes and join them at their tips so that each one is pushing against the others impetus toward a singularity. I predict this will result in the collapsing spheres and atomic ignition. I call this structure/framework the genesis particle (GP). This is what scientists refer to as a "warp in space-time". So you can see that in this theory, in the micro, the (GP) will pull in PEE and transform the PEE into an atom. In the macro the GP will pull in atoms, matter and PEE and transform this into star ignition. Now the obvious question is why do I feel like the earth is pulling on me? Even though science believes that neutrinos do not interact with matter, in this theory they most certainly do. All of the GPs for each atom of the earth are pulling in PEE and I am standing in the stream. I have heard that billions of neutrinos per second are passing through one square inch of my body. As the flow of neutrinos passes by, the GPs of the atoms in my body pull on the neutrinos flowing toward earth. This causes a push on my cells and is what we measure and call the pull of gravity. So, actually it is the push of gravity that causes one mass to move toward another. If, in the macro, a small mass slowly approaches a large mass, it will be ensnared by the collapsing spheres of GP and be pushed into an orbit around the larger object, All of the calculations about the affect of gravity are, of course, spot on. It's just the concept that the larger mass exerts some kind of mysterious pull on the smaller object that is in error. The larger mass pulls only on the PEE field with its GP. I believe that I can create a genesis particle (GP) in earths gravity field which will set up it's own gravity field, separate and apart from earths gravity field. When this GP becomes strong enough, anything inside the new gravity field will not be affected by earths gravity field. The GPs of all the atoms inside the collapsing spheres will feed on PEE in the spheres, not the PEE racing toward the earth. this eliminates the push toward earth. This will, in effect, create a bubble inside earths gravity field where no gravity force except it's own will exist. Anything inside the GP will be weightless with reference to the earth and be able to move around in earths gravity field with zero g-force. When a machine is built that will create a GP we will be able to harvest energy from PEE. BTUs per ton to move stuff around on earth will be reduced by as much as 90%. That alone would be worth trillions of dollars to the world economy per/year. Not to mention completely retooling our vehicle industries. It would usher in another industrial revolution, clean this time. We should take a fraction of the collider money and build GP gravity machines. regards, graybear aka jag "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Einstein