Bufofrog

No you will end up with salt water, sodium ions and chlorides in water

I see a drawing but I don't see a proof.

If it was all nonsense then experimentation would not agree with the theory, but it does so it isn't all nonsense. I'll bet logicandreason just had an epiphany after reading my answer and he now agrees with relativity!

Teaching differential equations on a science forum is not doable. There are online courses but keep in mind you must do the homework to get the full gist of the class.

I'm not sure if he ever said that, but I am pretty sure he said, "You are a very pretty pigeon".

No, dogs have evolved to have a different diet than a wolf due to their association with people.

So it's not free after all.

How in the world could this be free and It seems like a useless idea. If I'm driving along I can only talk to other drivers? This idea doesn't make any sense to me.

My guess is your dad dropped it and your mom accidentally stepped on it. They should have gotten a new one IMO.

That would be a neat trick.

I think you come off as a bit haughty.

Could you supply a source for this experiment?

What are the units of c?

It may be, but I would recommend that you do not use this super power to fight crime. Most hardened criminals will not be intimidated by the ability to feel weird.

It doesn't. Ignoring the answers can result in negative points. Asking the same question over and over while ignoring the answers that people took time to write will definitely give you negative points. Making up spur of the moment conjectures to answer your own question, because you don't like the answers you received is also an excellent way to get down votes.

The answers to those questions are literally in the previous couple of posts, except that the speed of light is c, which no one apparently thought you needed to be told. The fact that you asked some questions received the answers and the immediately claimed no one answered the questions certainly seems like you are arguing in bad faith. That attitude is usually the hallmark of a troll. No one agrees with you that the speed of light was not c. The fact that you cannot even understand that, really makes me think this thread has no chance of helping your confusion.

You are looking at this all wrong, this thought experiment makes no sense. According to your 'logic' as you moved away from a light source it would not get dimmer, is that what we observe? You can say the same silly thing about your car, you are seeing the light from your car not the car itself.

Except that it's not true and no one thinks that. Your point of view does not make sense. Your time would be much better spent reading a few articles about the expansion of the universe with an open mind...

You are looking at this all wrong. Another thing, how could the universe be unnatural, that's an oxymoron.

You are really reaching now and just clinging to your idea. I suggest that you do some reading about the expansion of the universe to help you understand the concept better.

Because there is no possible way it would not "shrink". You really need to think about this instead of digging in your heels. Here is an analogy, if there was a large explosion and you were 1 mile away it would be very loud. If on the other hand when this explosion happened you were in a jet moving close to the speed of sound away from the explosion, when the sound wave passed you at, say 10 miles from the explosion, would it be just as loud as the 1 mile distance?

No, the image would not "expand together with the universe". The distance between us and the galaxy increased, so fewer photons of light from that galaxy reaches our eyes. Isn't it kind of obvious that the farther away from a light you are the dimmer it gets, it doesn't matter that when the light was emitted it was closer to us.

Don't forget that the light from a galaxy that is 13 billion years old was a emitted a lot closer to us than 13 light years!

This is not a theory, this is just an idea you have based on some articles you read on the internet. Here are a few: Each primary universe can spawn numerous smaller, slower-paced sub-universes. This just something that you made up, that has no evidence that anything like this could be true. Upon reaching a saturation point in their internal expansion, they experience a dual explosion. Black holes do not have a saturation point. Black holes don't explode. The explosion within the black hole initiates the formation of a new subquantum universe. This just something you made up without a shred of evidence. This theory, while still in the realm of speculation, beckons further exploration and challenges our conventional understanding of time, space, and reality. A theory and a speculation are completely different things. Your idea is clearly just an idle speculation with no evidence to back it up, as such it is not science, it is a flight of fancy. Flights of fancy are fun but don't confuse them with science.

Why?